Literature DB >> 28259613

Biplane fluoroscopy for hindfoot motion analysis during gait: A model-based evaluation.

Janelle A Cross1, Benjamin D McHenry2, Robert Molthen3, Emily Exten4, Taly Gilat Schmidt5, Gerald F Harris6.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to quantify the accuracy and precision of a biplane fluoroscopy system for model-based tracking of in vivo hindfoot motion during over-ground gait. Gait was simulated by manually manipulating a cadaver foot specimen through a biplane fluoroscopy system attached to a walkway. Three 1.6-mm diameter steel beads were implanted into the specimen to provide marker-based tracking measurements for comparison to model-based tracking. A CT scan was acquired to define a gold standard of implanted bead positions and to create 3D models for model-based tracking. Static and dynamic trials manipulating the specimen through the capture volume were performed. Marker-based tracking error was calculated relative to the gold standard implanted bead positions. The bias, precision, and root-mean-squared (RMS) error of model-based tracking was calculated relative to the marker-based measurements. The overall RMS error of the model-based tracking method averaged 0.43 ± 0.22mm and 0.66 ± 0.43° for static and 0.59 ± 0.10mm and 0.71 ± 0.12° for dynamic trials. The model-based tracking approach represents a non-invasive technique for accurately measuring dynamic hindfoot joint motion during in vivo, weight bearing conditions. The model-based tracking method is recommended for application on the basis of the study results.
Copyright © 2017 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Biplane fluoroscopy; Gait; Hindfoot; Model-based

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28259613     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  6 in total

1.  Verifying a C-arm-based roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis protocol for assessing tibial implant movement in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vivian W J Chung; Robyn Newell; Angela Kedgley; Carolyn Anglin; Bassam A Masri; Antony J Hodgson
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.079

2.  Influence of Shod and Barefoot Running on the In Vivo Kinematics of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint.

Authors:  Faning Zhang; Dongqiang Ye; Xini Zhang; Xiaole Sun; Shen Zhang; Shaobai Wang; Weijie Fu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-16

Review 3.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Peritalar Injuries in the Acute Trauma Setting: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Abdul R Arain; Curtis T Adams; Stefanos F Haddad; Muhammad Moral; Joseph Young; Khusboo Desai; Andrew J Rosenbaum
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2020-01-03

4.  Effects of Barefoot and Shod on the In Vivo Kinematics of Medial Longitudinal Arch During Running Based on a High-Speed Dual Fluoroscopic Imaging System.

Authors:  Wanyan Su; Shen Zhang; Dongqiang Ye; Xiaole Sun; Xini Zhang; Weijie Fu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-28

5.  Comparison of in vivo hindfoot joints motion changes during stance phase between non-flatfoot and stage II adult acquired flatfoot.

Authors:  Zhenhan Deng; Zijun Cai; Siyu Chen; Yan Liu; Fanglin Chen; Zhiqin Deng; Yusheng Li; Jian Xu
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 6.  In Vivo Foot and Ankle Kinematics During Activities Measured by Using a Dual Fluoroscopic Imaging System: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Dongqiang Ye; Xiaole Sun; Cui Zhang; Shen Zhang; Xini Zhang; Shaobai Wang; Weijie Fu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-07-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.