Literature DB >> 28259414

Citizens' views on the practices of zero-grazing and cow-calf separation in the dairy industry: Does providing information increase acceptability?

Maria J Hötzel1, Clarissa S Cardoso2, Angélica Roslindo2, Marina A G von Keyserlingk3.   

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to assess the influence of provision of information on lay citizens' opinions regarding 2 common management practices, zero-grazing and cow-calf separation. To aid in the interpretation of the findings, our secondary aim was to explore the awareness and opinions of Brazilian citizens about these practices. We surveyed a convenience sample of Brazilian citizens (192 men and 208 women), recruited in a public place, with the majority stating that they were largely unfamiliar with animal production and lived in urban environments. Participants were presented short scenarios with information on the primary production factors and welfare concerns for and against zero-grazing (n = 200) or cow-calf separation (n = 200). Participants were then asked to state their position (reject, indifferent, or support), and to provide the reason(s) justifying their position. Immediately following, participants were provided a short statement describing either zero-grazing or cow-calf separation, depending on what question they responded to in the first part. Two closed questions (Q) followed each of these statements: (Q1) "Are you aware of this practice?" with choices yes, somewhat, or no, and (Q2) "What is your position regarding this practice?" with choices reject, indifferent, or support. Only 31 and 33% of the respondents were aware of zero-grazing and cow-calf separation, respectively. Previous awareness of existence of practice did not influence levels of support. Provision of information resulted in more people rejecting the practices of zero-grazing and cow-calf separation. Participants' main justifications to reject zero-grazing and cow-calf separation focused on perceived negative effects of practices on farm animal welfare and product quality, and loss of naturalness. Survey participants, Brazilians living in urban environments, with little or no association with dairy production, were generally unaware that many cows do not have access to pasture and that cows are separated from their calf at birth. Independent of provision of additional information, most participants did not support these practices. Provision of brief explanatory information played a minor role in influencing people's views, but failed to result in general acceptance.
Copyright © 2017 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal welfare; public attitude; public perception; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28259414     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  17 in total

1.  Brazilian Citizens: Expectations Regarding Dairy Cattle Welfare and Awareness of Contentious Practices.

Authors:  Clarissa S Cardoso; Marina A G von Keyserlingk; Maria José Hötzel
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Public opinion towards castration without anaesthesia and lack of access to pasture in beef cattle production.

Authors:  Dayane Lemos Teixeira; Rafael Larraín; Oscar Melo; María José Hötzel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  American Citizens' Views of an Ideal Pig Farm.

Authors:  Patrycia Sato; Maria J Hötzel; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Brazilian Citizens' Opinions and Attitudes about Farm Animal Production Systems.

Authors:  Maria C Yunes; Marina A G von Keyserlingk; Maria J Hötzel
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Are views towards egg farming associated with Brazilian and Chilean egg consumers' purchasing habits?

Authors:  Dayane Lemos Teixeira; Rafael Larraín; Maria José Hötzel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  How do Brazilian citizens perceive animal welfare conditions in poultry, beef, and dairy supply chains?

Authors:  Ricardo Guimarães de Queiroz; Carla Heloisa de Faria Domingues; Maria Eugênia Andrighetto Canozzi; Rodrigo Garófallo Garcia; Clandio Favarini Ruviaro; Júlio Otávio Jardim Barcellos; João Augusto Rossi Borges
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Is gene editing an acceptable alternative to castration in pigs?

Authors:  Maria Cristina Yunes; Dayane L Teixeira; Marina A G von Keyserlingk; Maria J Hötzel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The Influence of Different Types of Outdoor Access on Dairy Cattle Behavior.

Authors:  Anne-Marieke C Smid; Daniel M Weary; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-05-13

9.  Meat Consumers' Opinion Regarding Unhealthy Pigs: Should They Be Treated with Antibiotics or Euthanized on Farm?

Authors:  Dayane Lemos Teixeira; Daniel Enriquez-Hidalgo; Tamara Estay Espinoza; Fernando Bas; Maria José Hötzel
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-09

10.  On the Road to End Pig Pain: Knowledge and Attitudes of Brazilian Citizens Regarding Castration.

Authors:  Maria José Hötzel; Maria Cristina Yunes; Bianca Vandresen; Rita Albernaz-Gonçalves; Raphaela E Woodroffe
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.