Literature DB >> 28259412

Representing interconversions among volatile fatty acids in the Molly cow model.

S Ghimire1, R A Kohn2, P Gregorini3, R R White4, M D Hanigan4.   

Abstract

The Molly cow model uses fixed stoichiometric coefficients for predicting volatile fatty acid (VFA) production from the fermented individual dietary nutrient fractions of forage and concentrate. We previously showed that predictions of VFA production had large errors and hypothesized that it was due to a lack of representation of carbon exchange among VFA. The objectives of the present study were to add VFA interconversion equations based on thermodynamics to the Molly cow model and evaluate the effect of these additions on model accuracy and precision of VFA predictions. Previously described thermodynamic equations were introduced to represent interconversions among VFA. The model was further modified to predict de novo acetate, propionate, and butyrate production coefficients based on forage-to-concentrate ratios rather than discrete, fixed sets of coefficients for forage-based, concentrate-based, and mixed diets. Both the original model and the modified one were reparameterized and evaluated against a common data set containing 8 studies reporting pH, VFA concentration, and VFA production rates using isotope dilution techniques and 62 studies reporting VFA concentrations and pH. Evaluations after parameter estimation revealed that predictions of VFA production rates were not improved, with root mean squared prediction errors (RMSPE) of 77, 60, and 51% for acetate, propionate, and butyrate, respectively, for the revised model versus 75, 63, and 55, respectively, for the original model. The RMSPE for predictions of VFA concentrations were reduced from 28, 46, and 40% to 22, 31, and 26% for acetate, propionate, and butyrate, respectively, simply by rederiving the VFA coefficients, but minimal further improvement was achieved with the addition of thermodynamically driven interconversion equations (RMSPE of 21, 32, and 27% for acetate, propionate, and butyrate, respectively). Thus, the results indicate that thermodynamically driven interchanges among VFA, as represented in this study, may not be a primary determinant for the accuracy of predictions of net production rates. Including the effect of pH on VFA absorption reduced the mean bias of propionate production and slope bias of acetate production, but not the overall RMSPE. The larger prediction errors for VFA production as compared with concentrations suggest the data quality may not be high, or that our representation of VFA production and absorption as well as ruminal digestion is inadequate. Additional data are required to discriminate among these hypotheses.
Copyright © 2017 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Molly; isotope dilution; volatile fatty acids

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28259412     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  4 in total

1.  Dynamic Alterations in Yak Rumen Bacteria Community and Metabolome Characteristics in Response to Feed Type.

Authors:  Chang Liu; Hao Wu; Shujie Liu; Shatuo Chai; Qingxiang Meng; Zhenming Zhou
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 6.064

2.  Dietary Concentrate-to-Forage Ratio Affects Rumen Bacterial Community Composition and Metabolome of Yaks.

Authors:  Simeng Yi; Dongwen Dai; Hao Wu; Shatuo Chai; Shujie Liu; Qingxiang Meng; Zhenming Zhou
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-07-14

3.  Simulated seasonal diets alter yak rumen microbiota structure and metabolic function.

Authors:  Xugang Yang; Xueni Fan; Hui Jiang; Qiang Zhang; Qunying Zhang; Siqi Dang; Ruijun Long; Xiaodan Huang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Dynamics of rumen bacterial composition of yak (Bos grunniens) in response to dietary supplements during the cold season.

Authors:  Anum Ali Ahmad; Jian Bo Zhang; Zeyi Liang; Chao Yang; Qudratullah Kalwar; Tariq Shah; Mei Du; Ishaq Muhammad; Juanshan Zheng; Ping Yan; Xue-Zhi Ding; Ruijun Long
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.