| Literature DB >> 28259154 |
Jen-Chieh Tsai1, Chuan-Sung Chiu2, Yun-Chieh Chen3, Meng-Shiou Lee3, Xiu-Ying Hao4, Ming-Tsuen Hsieh3, Chun-Pin Kao5, Wen-Huang Peng6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Coreopsis tinctoria is a traditional remedy for the management of various diseases including hepatitis. The hepatoprotective role of the plant is not scientifically explored till now. This study was designed to investigate the hepatoprotective potentials of the ethanol extract from C. tinctoria (CTEtOH) using an animal model of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced acute liver injury.Entities:
Keywords: Carbon tetrachloride; Coreopsis tinctoria; Hepatoprotective
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28259154 PMCID: PMC5336617 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-1604-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Fig. 1Effects of CTEtOH and silymarin on serum AST and ALT levels in mice treated with CCl4. Each value is represented as the mean ± SEM (n = 10). ### p < 0.001, compared with the control group. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01, compared with the CCl4 group (one-way ANOVA followed by Scheffe’s multiple range test)
Fig. 2Hepatic histological analyses of CTEtOH and silymarin on CCl4-induced acute liver damage in mice. Liver tissues were subjected to hematoxylin and eosin staining (400×). a Control group; (b) animals treated with 0.2% CCl4; displayed cell necrosis (long arrow) and vacuole formation (short arrow) (c) animals pretreated with silymarin (200 mg/kg) and then treated with CCl4; (d–f) animals pretreated with CTEtOH (0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 g/kg) and then treated with CCl4
Fig. 3Effects of CTEtOH and silymarin on the liver MDA (a) and NO (b) levels in mice treated with CCl4. Each value is represented as the mean ± SEM (n = 10). ### p < 0.001, compared with the control group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001, compared with the CCl4 group (one-way ANOVA followed by Scheffe’s multiple range test)
Effect of CTEtOH on the levels of different proinflammatory cytokines in CCl4-treated mice
| Groups | Pro-inflammatory cytokines (pg/mg protein) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| TNF-α | IL-1β | IL-6 | |
| Control | 31.88 ± 2.17 | 161.86 ± 13.66 | 8.70 ± 0.51 |
| CCl4 | 82.74 ± 5.02### | 1608.68 ± 33.86### | 33.89 ± 1.76### |
| CCl4 + Silymarin (200 mg/kg) | 51.24 ± 2.04*** | 994.86 ± 35.66*** | 15.97 ± 1.60*** |
| CCl4 + CTEtOH (0.1 g/kg) | 87.54 ± 4.53 | 1445.95 ± 88.75 | 36.05 ± 5.77 |
| CCl4 + CTEtOH (0.5 g/kg) | 66.02 ± 6.78* | 1275.45 ± 151.73* | 28.28 ± 2.28 |
| CCl4 + CTEtOH (1.0 g/kg) | 60.82 ± 4.76* | 1168.69 ± 97.21** | 23.23 ± 1.30* |
Each value is represented as the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 10). ### p < 0.001, compared with the control group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001, compared with the CCl4 group (one-way ANOVA followed by Scheffe’s multiple range test)
Effect of CTEtOH on the activities of different antioxidant enzymes in CCl4-treated mice
| Groups | SOD | GPx | GRd |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 5.33 ± 0.12 | 0.856 ± 0.088 | 0.104 ± 0.012 |
| CCl4 | 4.68 ± 0.11## | 0.391 ± 0.061### | 0.051 ± 0.007## |
| CCl4 + Silymarin (200 mg/kg) | 6.06 ± 0.14*** | 0.812 ± 0.120** | 0.092 ± 0.008** |
| CCl4 + CTEtOH (0.1 g/kg) | 4.74 ± 0.18 | 0.436 ± 0.068 | 0.056 ± 0.040 |
| CCl4 + CTEtOH (0.5 g/kg) | 5.93 ± 0.08*** | 0.567 ± 0.052 | 0.801 ± 0.006* |
| CCl4 + CTEtOH (1.0 g/kg) | 5.92 ± 0.07*** | 0.771 ± 0.091** | 0.891 ± 0.011** |
Each value is represented as the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 10). ## p < 0.01 and ### p < 0.001, compared with the control group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001, compared with the CCl4 group (one-way ANOVA followed by Scheffe’s multiple range test)
Fig. 4HPLC chromatogram at 254 nm. Key to the peaks: 1-chlorogenic acid, 2-marein