| Literature DB >> 28259136 |
Ke-Ke Qi1, Jia-Jia Lv1, Jie Wu1, Zi-Wei Xu2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Polyethylene glycosylated (PEGylated) porcine glucagon-like peptide-2 (pGLP-2) considerably increases half-life and stability compared with the native pGLP-2, but the effective dose for intestinal damage is still unclear. This study aims to evaluate the available dose of polyethylene glycosylated porcine glucagon-like peptide-2 (PEG-pGLP-2), a modified, long-acting form of pGLP-2 in an experimental rat model of ulcerative colitis.Entities:
Keywords: Inflammation cytokines; Porcine glucagon-like peptide-2; Tight junction; Ulcerative colitis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28259136 PMCID: PMC5336612 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-017-0593-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Gastroenterol ISSN: 1471-230X Impact factor: 3.067
Primer sequences (5′ to 3′) used for the quantitative polymerase chain reaction
| Gene | Forward primer | Reverse primer |
|---|---|---|
| ZO-1 | CCATCTTTGGACCGATTGCTG | TAATGCCCGAGCTCCGATG |
| Occludin | ACGGTGCCATAGAATGAGATGTTG | CAGCTAGTTGTTCATTTCTGCACCA |
| Claudin-1 | CATCGCAGCTACTTGCCAGT | TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTGCAAAAACGA |
| IL-1 | TCAGGAAGGCAGTGTCACTCATTG | ACACACTAGCAGGTCGTCATCATC |
| IL-6 | TAGAGTCACAGAAGGAGTGG | GCCAGTTCTTCGTAGAGA |
| IL-7 | AACCTCCAAGAAACTACTGCC | CACCGATGCATGGTTGCTAAC |
| IL-10 | CTCAGCACTGCTATGCTGCCTGCT | TCTTCACCTGCTCCACTGCCTTGC |
| INF-γ | TGTCATCGAATCGCACCT | TCAGCACCGACTCCTTTT |
| TNF-α | ACCCCCAACCTATGAAGAAA | TCCACGCAAAACGGAATGAA |
| GADPH | CCGAGGGCCCACTAAAGG | GCTGTTGAAGTCACAGGAGACAA |
Effects of polyethylene glycosylated (PEGylated) porcine glucagon-like peptide-2 (pGLP-2) on growth performance of colitis rats
| Groups | Body weight change, % | Intestinal length, cm | Colonic length, cm | Intestinal weight (mg)/body weight (g) | Colonic weight (mg)/body weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 30.48 ± 3.44a | 94.72 ± 4.93 | 15.69 ± 1.90a | 30.61 ± 2.22 | 11.19 ± 1.90b |
| Dextran sodium sulphate (DSS) | 11.90 ± 5.04c | 92.88 ± 9.78 | 12.40 ± 1.94b | 35.19 ± 1.22 | 9.15 ± 1.79b |
| DSS + PEG–pGLP-2(L) | 21.45 ± 2.00b | 94.50 ± 7.07 | 14.74 ± 1.90a | 34.51 ± 3.09 | 14.13 ± 2.77a |
| DSS + PEG–pGLP-2(M) | 21.46 ± 4.65b | 99.10 ± 8.03 | 14.48 ± 1.42ab | 38.91 ± 4.23 | 14.22 ± 0.38a |
| DSS + PEG–pGLP-2(H) | 20.63 ± 3.4b | 99.56 ± 6.82 | 13.42 ± 0.80ab | 35.87 ± 1.73 | 11.52 ± 0.64b |
Data are expressed as means ± SD; no significant difference exists in that with no letter or the same letters (p > 0.05), and different letters (p < 0.05) indicate statistically significant difference
Fig. 1Effects of PEG-pGLP-2 on the morphology and inflammation score of colon. a, b, c, d, e is the morphology of colon in group of Control, DSS, DSS + PEG–pGLP-2(L), DSS + PEG–pGLP-2(M), DSS + PEG–pGLP-2(H). Data of the colonic inflammation score (f) are expressed as means ± SD and different letters (p < 0.05) indicate statistically significant difference
Effects of PEG-pGLP-2 on morphology of duodenum in colitis rats
| Groups | Villus height, μm | Crypt depth, μm | Villus height/Crypt depth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1016.37 ± 49.60a | 401.79 ± 57.00 | 2.22 ± 0.12b |
| DSS | 777.99 ± 104.34b | 337.15 ± 30.19 | 2.28 ± 0.16b |
| DSS + PEG–pGLP-2(L) | 981.46 ± 136.04a | 400.76 ± 62.04 | 2.66 ± 0.49ab |
| DSS + PEG–pGLP-2(M) | 1006.42 ± 98.11a | 357.43 ± 52.21 | 2.98 ± 0.49a |
| DSS + PEG–pGLP-2(H) | 1003.03 ± 96.41a | 419.63 ± 51.00 | 2.39 ± 0.30b |
Data are expressed as means ± SD; no significant difference exists in that with no letter or the same letters (p > 0.05), and different letters (p < 0.05) indicate statistically significant difference
Fig. 2Effects of PEG-pGLP-2 on the expression levels of tight junction proteins and inflammatory cytokines in colon of colitis rats. a, b, c is the expression levels of ZO-1, Occludin and Claudin-1. d, e, f, g, h, i is the expression levels of IL-1, IL-6, IL-7, IL-10, IFN-γ andTNF-α. Data are expressed as means ± SD; no significant difference exists in that with no letter or the same letters (p > 0.05), and different letters (p < 0.05) indicate statistically significant difference