Literature DB >> 28259077

Assessment of the efficacy of membrane filtration processes to remove human enteric viruses and the suitability of bacteriophages and a plant virus as surrogates for those viruses.

N Shirasaki1, T Matsushita2, Y Matsui2, K Murai2.   

Abstract

Here, we evaluated the efficacy of direct microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) to remove three representative human enteric viruses (i.e., adenovirus [AdV] type 40, coxsackievirus [CV] B5, and hepatitis A virus [HAV] IB), and one surrogate of human caliciviruses (i.e., murine norovirus [MNV] type 1). Eight different MF membranes and three different UF membranes were used. We also examined the ability of coagulation pretreatment with high-basicity polyaluminum chloride (PACl) to enhance virus removal by MF. The removal ratios of two bacteriophages (MS2 and φX174) and a plant virus (pepper mild mottle virus; PMMoV) were compared with the removal ratios of the human enteric viruses to assess the suitability of these viruses to be used as surrogates for human enteric viruses. The virus removal ratios obtained with direct MF with membranes with nominal pore sizes of 0.1-0.22 μm differed, depending on the membrane used; adsorptive interactions, particularly hydrophobic interactions between virus particles and the membrane surface, were dominant factors for virus removal. In contrast, direct UF with membranes with nominal molecular weight cutoffs of 1-100 kDa effectively removed viruses through size exclusion, and >4-log10 removal was achieved when a membrane with a nominal molecular weight cutoff of 1 kDa was used. At pH 7 and 8, in-line coagulation-MF with nonsulfated high-basicity PACls containing Al30 species had generally a better virus removal (i.e., >4-log10 virus removal) than the other aluminum-based coagulants, except for φX174. For all of the filtration processes, the removal ratios of AdV, CV, HAV, and MNV were comparable and strongly correlated with each other. The removal ratios of MS2 and PMMoV were comparable or smaller than those of the three human enteric viruses and MNV, and were strongly correlated with those of the three human enteric viruses and MNV. The removal ratios obtained with coagulation-MF for φX174 were markedly smaller than those obtained for the three human enteric viruses and MNV. However, because MS2 was inactivated after contact with PACl during coagulation pretreatment, unlike AdV, CV, MNV, and PMMoV, the removal ratios of infectious MS2 were probably an overestimation of the ability of coagulation-MF to remove infectious AdV, CV, and caliciviruses. Thus, PMMoV appears to be a suitable surrogate for human enteric viruses, whereas MS2 and φX174 do not, for the assessment of the efficacy of membrane filtration processes to remove viruses.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrostatic interaction; Hydrophobic interaction; Microfiltration; Nonsulfated high-basicity PACl; Pepper mild mottle virus; Ultrafiltration

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28259077     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  10 in total

1.  How Fiber Breakage Reduces Microorganism Removal in Ultrafiltration for Wastewater Reclamation.

Authors:  Suntae Lee; Naoyuki Yamashita; Hiroaki Tanaka
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 2.  Pepper mild mottle virus: A plant pathogen with a greater purpose in (waste)water treatment development and public health management.

Authors:  E M Symonds; Karena H Nguyen; V J Harwood; M Breitbart
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 11.236

3.  Transfer of Enteric Viruses Adenovirus and Coxsackievirus and Bacteriophage MS2 from Liquid to Human Skin.

Authors:  Ana K Pitol; Heather N Bischel; Alexandria B Boehm; Tamar Kohn; Timothy R Julian
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Antiviral, Antioxidant, and Antihemolytic Effect of Annona muricata L. Leaves Extracts.

Authors:  Ana Paola Balderrama-Carmona; Norma Patricia Silva-Beltrán; Juan-Carlos Gálvez-Ruiz; Saúl Ruíz-Cruz; Cristóbal Chaidez-Quiroz; Edgar Felipe Morán-Palacio
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-26

Review 5.  Roadmap for Managing SARS-CoV-2 and Other Viruses in the Water Environment for Public Health.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Jiuhui Qu; Joan Rose; Gertjan Medema
Journal:  Engineering (Beijing)       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 12.834

6.  Selection of surrogate viruses for process control in detection of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater.

Authors:  Md Alamin; Shohei Tsuji; Akihiko Hata; Hiroe Hara-Yamamura; Ryo Honda
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 10.753

7.  Recovery of Nucleic Acids of Enteric Viruses and Host-Specific Bacteroidales from Groundwater by Using an Adsorption-Direct Extraction Method.

Authors:  Takayuki Miura; Hiroyuki Takino; Arisa Gima; Eiji Haramoto; Michihiro Akiba
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Recovery of SARS-CoV-2 from Wastewater Using Centrifugal Ultrafiltration.

Authors:  Brienna L Anderson-Coughlin; Adrienne E H Shearer; Alexis N Omar; K Eric Wommack; Kalmia E Kniel
Journal:  Methods Protoc       Date:  2021-05-12

9.  Survival of viral pathogens in animal feed ingredients under transboundary shipping models.

Authors:  Scott A Dee; Fernando V Bauermann; Megan C Niederwerder; Aaron Singrey; Travis Clement; Marcelo de Lima; Craig Long; Gilbert Patterson; Maureen A Sheahan; Ana M M Stoian; Vlad Petrovan; Cassandra K Jones; Jon De Jong; Ju Ji; Gordon D Spronk; Luke Minion; Jane Christopher-Hennings; Jeff J Zimmerman; Raymond R R Rowland; Eric Nelson; Paul Sundberg; Diego G Diel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Characterization of Novel Biopolymer Blend Mycocel from Plant Cellulose and Fungal Fibers.

Authors:  Ilze Irbe; Inese Filipova; Marite Skute; Anna Zajakina; Karina Spunde; Talis Juhna
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 4.329

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.