Literature DB >> 28258868

Rates of Complications and Secondary Surgeries After In Situ Cubital Tunnel Release Compared With Ulnar Nerve Transposition: A Retrospective Review.

Dafang Zhang1, Brandon E Earp2, Philip Blazar2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to contrast the rate and types of complications and secondary surgeries for in situ cubital tunnel release and ulnar nerve transposition.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed by query of hospital billing records for all patients who underwent cubital tunnel surgery from August 2008 to July 2013, yielding 421 patients. Exclusion criteria were acute trauma, revision surgery, neoplasm, age younger than 18 years, incomplete records, and postoperative follow-up less than 3 months. Of the remaining 234 patients, 147 patients underwent 157 in situ cubital tunnel releases and 87 patients underwent 90 ulnar nerve transpositions.
RESULTS: In 157 in situ cubital tunnel releases, there were 6 complications (3.8%), including 3 cases (1.9%) of ulnar nerve instability, 2 cases (1.3%) of postoperative infection, and 1 case (0.6%) of a postoperative seroma. In 90 ulnar nerve transpositions, there were 2 complications (2.2%), including 1 case (1.1%) of postoperative infection and 1 case (1.1%) of medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury. The secondary surgery rate was 5.7% overall, 2.5% for in situ cubital tunnel release, and 11.1% for ulnar nerve transposition. Chronic kidney disease was associated with complication after cubital tunnel surgery. Prior trauma to the elbow and ulnar nerve transposition were associated with secondary surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The short-term complication rates of cubital tunnel surgery are low (3.2%), but higher for patients with chronic kidney disease. The secondary surgery rate after cubital tunnel surgery was 5.7% overall, but higher for patients with prior elbow trauma and for patients undergoing ulnar nerve transposition. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cubital tunnel syndrome; complications; in situ decompression; secondary surgery; ulnar nerve transposition

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28258868     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  6 in total

1.  Decision-Making Factors for Ulnar Nerve Transposition in Cubital Tunnel Surgery.

Authors:  Brent R DeGeorge; Sanjeev Kakar
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2018-07-02

2.  Trends in the Surgical Treatment for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Survey of Members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand.

Authors:  Ayesha Yahya; Andrew R Malarkey; Ryan L Eschbaugh; H Brent Bamberger
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-08-23

3.  Ulnar Nerve In Situ Decompression versus Transposition for Idiopathic Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Joseph Said; Duncan Van Nest; Carol Foltz; Asif M Ilyas
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2018-09-27

4.  Ulnar Nerve Enlargement at the Medial Epicondyle Negatively Correlates With Nerve Conduction Velocity in Cubital Tunnel Syndrome.

Authors:  T David Luo; Amy P Trammell; Luke P Hedrick; Ethan R Wiesler; Francis O Walker; Mark J Warburton
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-08-07

5.  Safety and Outcomes of Different Surgical Techniques for Cubital Tunnel Decompression: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ryckie G Wade; Timothy T Griffiths; Robert Flather; Nicholas E Burr; Mario Teo; Grainne Bourke
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-11-02

6.  Bi-columnar locking plate fixation through a combined medial and lateral approach for the treatment of low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly.

Authors:  Sam-Guk Park; Hyun-Gyu Seok
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 2.562

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.