Lucia Bonet1, Clara Izquierdo2, Maria Jose Escartí3, José Vicente Sancho4, David Arce5, Ignacio Blanquer5, Julio Sanjuan6. 1. Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, España. 2. Institut d'Assistència Sanitària (IAS), Girona, España. 3. Hospital Clínico de Valencia, INCLIVA, Valencia, España; CIBERSAM, España. 4. ESIC Business School, Valencia, España. 5. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, España. 6. Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, España; Hospital Clínico de Valencia, INCLIVA, Valencia, España; CIBERSAM, España. Electronic address: julio.sanjuan@uv.es.
Abstract
There is a growing interest in mobile Health interventions (m-Health) in patients with psychosis. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review in order to analysethe current state of research in this area. The search of articles was carried out following the PRISMA criteria, focusing on those studies that used mobile technologies in patients with psychosis during the period from 1990 to 2016. A total of 20 articles were selected from the 431 studies found. Three types of studies are distinguished: 1) Analysis of quality and usability, 2) Improving treatment adherence and reducing hospital admissions, and 3) Analysisof patient symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: m-Health interventions are feasible, and are easy to use for patients with psychosis. They evaluate the evolution of psychotic symptoms more efficiently, and improve adherence to treatment, as well as symptoms and hospital admissions. However, a particular strategy does not stand out over the rest, because differences in methodology make them difficult to compare.
There is a growing interest in mobile Health interventions (m-Health) in patients with psychosis. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review in order to analysethe current state of research in this area. The search of articles was carried out following the PRISMA criteria, focusing on those studies that used mobile technologies in patients with psychosis during the period from 1990 to 2016. A total of 20 articles were selected from the 431 studies found. Three types of studies are distinguished: 1) Analysis of quality and usability, 2) Improving treatment adherence and reducing hospital admissions, and 3) Analysisof patient symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: m-Health interventions are feasible, and are easy to use for patients with psychosis. They evaluate the evolution of psychotic symptoms more efficiently, and improve adherence to treatment, as well as symptoms and hospital admissions. However, a particular strategy does not stand out over the rest, because differences in methodology make them difficult to compare.
Authors: Mor Nahum; Hyunkyu Lee; Melissa Fisher; Michael F Green; Christine I Hooker; Joseph Ventura; Joshua T Jordan; Annika Rose; Sarah-Jane Kim; Kristen M Haut; Michael M Merzenich; Sophia Vinogradov Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2021-01-23 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Thomas Steare; Puffin O'Hanlon; Michelle Eskinazi; David Osborn; Brynmor Lloyd-Evans; Rebecca Jones; Helen Rostill; Sarah Amani; Sonia Johnson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-03-20 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Andre Luiz Schuh Teixeira; Alex Vicente Spadini; Victor Pereira-Sanchez; Margaret Isioma Ojeahere; Kana Morimoto; Alice Chang; Renato de Filippis; Joan Soler-Vidal Journal: Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment (Engl Ed) Date: 2020-06-12
Authors: Lucia Bonet; Blanca Llácer; Miguel Hernandez-Viadel; David Arce; Ignacio Blanquer; Carlos Cañete; Maria Escartí; Ana M González-Pinto; Julio Sanjuán Journal: JMIR Ment Health Date: 2018-07-25
Authors: Chelsea Arnold; Kristi-Ann Villagonzalo; Denny Meyer; John Farhall; Fiona Foley; Michael Kyrios; Neil Thomas Journal: Internet Interv Date: 2019-08-15
Authors: Thomas Steare; Puffin O'Hanlon; Michelle Eskinazi; David Osborn; Brynmor Lloyd-Evans; Rebecca Jones; Helen Rostill; Sarah Amani; Sonia Johnson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-08-26 Impact factor: 2.692