Deeptee Jain1, Long-Co L Nguyen1, Ilya Bendich1, Long L Nguyen1, Courtland G Lewis2, James I Huddleston3, Paul J Duwelius4, Brian T Feeley1, Kevin J Bozic5. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 2. Orthopaedic Associates of Hartford, Hartford, Connecticut. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. 4. Orthopaedic Fracture Specialists, Portland, Oregon. 5. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationship between patient expectations, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and satisfaction in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients is not well understood. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated patients who underwent primary TKA at 4 institutions. Demographics were collected. Preoperatively, patients completed the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Replacement Expectations Survey (HSS-KRES), SF-12, UCLA activity, and Knee Disability and Osteoarthritis Score. At 6 months and 1 year postoperatively, patients completed the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Replacement Fulfillment of Expectations Survey (HSS-KRFES), a satisfaction survey, and PROs. Step-wise multivariate regression models were created. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were enrolled. At 6 months and 1 year postoperatively, the follow-up rate was 84.3% and 92.7%, respectively. No demographics or preoperative PROs were predictive of HSS-KRES. Preoperative HSS-KRES did not predict postoperative satisfaction, but higher HSS-KRES predicted higher HSS-KRFES at 1 year, greater improvement in UCLA activity at 6 months and 1 year, and SF-12 Physical Composite Scale and Knee Disability and Osteoarthritis Score at 6 months. Higher HSS-KRFES predicted higher satisfaction at 6 months and 1 year. CONCLUSION: In TKA patients, preoperative expectations are not influenced by patient demographics or preoperative function. Higher preoperative expectations predict greater postoperative improvement in PROs and fulfillment of expectations. These findings highlight the importance of preoperative patient expectations on postoperative outcome.
BACKGROUND: The relationship between patient expectations, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and satisfaction in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients is not well understood. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated patients who underwent primary TKA at 4 institutions. Demographics were collected. Preoperatively, patients completed the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Replacement Expectations Survey (HSS-KRES), SF-12, UCLA activity, and Knee Disability and Osteoarthritis Score. At 6 months and 1 year postoperatively, patients completed the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Replacement Fulfillment of Expectations Survey (HSS-KRFES), a satisfaction survey, and PROs. Step-wise multivariate regression models were created. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were enrolled. At 6 months and 1 year postoperatively, the follow-up rate was 84.3% and 92.7%, respectively. No demographics or preoperative PROs were predictive of HSS-KRES. Preoperative HSS-KRES did not predict postoperative satisfaction, but higher HSS-KRES predicted higher HSS-KRFES at 1 year, greater improvement in UCLA activity at 6 months and 1 year, and SF-12 Physical Composite Scale and Knee Disability and Osteoarthritis Score at 6 months. Higher HSS-KRFES predicted higher satisfaction at 6 months and 1 year. CONCLUSION: In TKA patients, preoperative expectations are not influenced by patient demographics or preoperative function. Higher preoperative expectations predict greater postoperative improvement in PROs and fulfillment of expectations. These findings highlight the importance of preoperative patient expectations on postoperative outcome.
Authors: Barbara L Conner-Spady; Eric Bohm; Lynda Loucks; Michael J Dunbar; Deborah A Marshall; Tom W Noseworthy Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Pim Brandenbarg; Puk Rooijers; Martijn G Steffens; Michael R van Balken; Henk-Jan Mulder; Marco H Blanker Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2020-08-19 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: Aoife MacMahon; Elizabeth A Cody; Kristin Caolo; Jensen K Henry; Mark C Drakos; Constantine A Demetracopoulos; Aleksander Savenkov; Scott J Ellis Journal: Foot Ankle Int Date: 2020-10-05 Impact factor: 2.827
Authors: Justin E Kung; Tina Zhang; Ali Aneizi; Scott Koenig; Keyan Shasti; Alexander J Wahl; Jonathan D Packer; Sean J Meredith; R Frank Henn Journal: J Clin Orthop Trauma Date: 2021-06-27
Authors: Daniel L Riddle; James Slover; Dennis Ang; Robert A Perera; Levent Dumenci Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Jaap J Tolk; Rob P A Janssen; Tsjitske M Haanstra; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Max Reijman Journal: Trials Date: 2018-08-14 Impact factor: 2.279