Literature DB >> 28258642

Benchmarking recent national practice in rectal cancer treatment with landmark randomized controlled trials.

.   

Abstract

AIM: A Snapshot study design eliminates changes in treatment and outcome over time. This population based Snapshot study aimed to determine current practice and outcome of rectal cancer treatment with published landmark randomized controlled trials as a benchmark.
METHOD: In this collaborative research project, the dataset of the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit was extended with additional treatment and long-term outcome data. All registered patients who underwent resection for rectal cancer in 2011 were eligible. Baseline characteristics and outcome were evaluated against the results of the Dutch TME trial and the COLOR II trial from which the original datasets were obtained.
RESULTS: A total of 71 hospitals participated, and data were completed for 2102 out of the potential 2633 patients (79.8%). Median follow-up was 41 (interquartile range 25-47) months. Overall circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement was 9.3% in the Snapshot cohort and 18.5% in the Dutch TME trial. CRM positivity after laparoscopic resection was 7.8% in the Snapshot and 9.5% in the COLOR II trial. Three-year overall local recurrence rate in the Snapshot was 5.9%, with a disease-free survival of 67.1% and overall survival of 79.5%. Benchmarking with the randomized controlled trials revealed an overall favourable long-term outcome of the Snapshot cohort.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that current rectal cancer care in a large unselected Dutch population is of high quality, with less positive CRM since the TME trial and oncologically safe implementation of minimally invasive surgery after the COLOR II trial. Colorectal Disease
© 2017 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rectal cancer; oncologic outcomes; snapshot study

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28258642     DOI: 10.1111/codi.13644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  13 in total

1.  Age and Outcome in Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Population-Based Evaluation of Oesophageal, Gastric and Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Anne Schlesinger-Raab; Jens Werner; Helmut Friess; Dieter Hölzel; Jutta Engel
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-08-07

2.  Comparison of Decompressing Stoma vs Stent as a Bridge to Surgery for Left-Sided Obstructive Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Joyce V Veld; Femke J Amelung; Wernard A A Borstlap; Emo E van Halsema; Esther C J Consten; Peter D Siersema; Frank Ter Borg; Edwin S van der Zaag; Johannes H W de Wilt; Paul Fockens; Wilhelmus A Bemelman; Jeanin E van Hooft; Pieter J Tanis
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Retrospective evaluation of national MRI reporting quality for lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer patients and concordance with prospective re-evaluation following additional training.

Authors:  Tania C Sluckin; Sanne-Marije J A Hazen; Karin Horsthuis; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Corrie A M Marijnen; Pieter J Tanis; Miranda Kusters
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-10-20

4.  The influence of hospital volume on long-term oncological outcome after rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Frederik H W Jonker; Jan A W Hagemans; Jacobus W A Burger; Cornelis Verhoef; Wernard A A Borstlap; Pieter J Tanis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Snapshot Study on the Value of Omentoplasty in Abdominoperineal Resection with Primary Perineal Closure for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Robin D Blok; Gijsbert D Musters; Wernard A A Borstlap; Christianne J Buskens; Wilhelmus A Bemelman; Pieter J Tanis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Transperineal minimally invasive APE: preliminary outcomes in a multicenter cohort.

Authors:  S E van Oostendorp; S X Roodbeen; C C Chen; A Caycedo-Marulanda; H M Joshi; P J Tanis; C Cunningham; J B Tuynman; R Hompes
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Cross-Sectional Study on MRI Restaging After Chemoradiotherapy and Interval to Surgery in Rectal Cancer: Influence on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Robin Detering; Wernard A A Borstlap; Lisa Broeders; Linda Hermus; Corrie A M Marijnen; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Willem A Bemelman; Henderik L van Westreenen; Pieter J Tanis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Structured training pathway and proctoring; multicenter results of the implementation of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) in the Netherlands.

Authors:  M Veltcamp Helbach; S E van Oostendorp; T W A Koedam; J J Knol; H B A C Stockmann; S J Oosterling; R C L M Vuylsteke; E J R de Graaf; P G Doornebosch; R Hompes; H J Bonjer; C Sietses; J B Tuynman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Influence of Conversion and Anastomotic Leakage on Survival in Rectal Cancer Surgery; Retrospective Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Edgar J B Furnée; Tjeerd S Aukema; Steven J Oosterling; Wernard A A Borstlap; Willem A Bemelman; Pieter J Tanis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Effect of understaging on local recurrence of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Louis J X Giesen; Wernard A A Borstlap; Willem A Bemelman; Pieter J Tanis; Cornelis Verhoef; Pim B Olthof
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 2.885

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.