Shane Cullinan1, Denis O'Mahony2, Stephen Byrne3. 1. RCSI School of Pharmacy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 1st Floor Ardilaun House Block B, 111 St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland. shanecullinan@rcsi.ie. 2. Department of Medicine, Cork University Hospital and School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. 3. Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The older patient population is significantly different from the younger adult population with regards to dose selection for a wide variety of drugs. Recent investigation of prescribing attitudes indicates that doctors feel there is insufficient distinction made between the two cohorts during their undergraduate education, and that doctors do not receive enough training in geriatric pharmacotherapy. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine if an online module, focused on geriatric pharmacotherapy, improves doctors' prescribing knowledge, as well as prescribing confidence, as applied to older patients. METHODS: The impact of an online educational module (SCRIPT) on hospital doctors' prescribing knowledge and confidence with regards to older patients was assessed by randomised controlled trial. Control and intervention groups completed assessments at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks. Primary outcome was difference in mean test scores. Student's t tests were used to analyse the data. Qualitative data on participant's confidence levels were also collected. RESULTS:Eighty participants completed the 12-week trial. The SCRIPT intervention resulted in a 22% difference in mean test scores between control and intervention groups at 4 weeks (23.12 marks versus 33.67 marks; p < 0.0001; 95% CI 8.13-12.97). This significance was maintained at 12 weeks. Thirty-four percent of participants in the intervention group rated themselves as 'confident' with regards to prescribing for older patients post-intervention compared with 12% in the control group. CONCLUSION: A short e-learning module focused on geriatric pharmacotherapy can significantly improve doctors' prescribing knowledge and confidence with regards to older patients. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02405975.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The older patient population is significantly different from the younger adult population with regards to dose selection for a wide variety of drugs. Recent investigation of prescribing attitudes indicates that doctors feel there is insufficient distinction made between the two cohorts during their undergraduate education, and that doctors do not receive enough training in geriatric pharmacotherapy. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine if an online module, focused on geriatric pharmacotherapy, improves doctors' prescribing knowledge, as well as prescribing confidence, as applied to older patients. METHODS: The impact of an online educational module (SCRIPT) on hospital doctors' prescribing knowledge and confidence with regards to older patients was assessed by randomised controlled trial. Control and intervention groups completed assessments at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks. Primary outcome was difference in mean test scores. Student's t tests were used to analyse the data. Qualitative data on participant's confidence levels were also collected. RESULTS: Eighty participants completed the 12-week trial. The SCRIPT intervention resulted in a 22% difference in mean test scores between control and intervention groups at 4 weeks (23.12 marks versus 33.67 marks; p < 0.0001; 95% CI 8.13-12.97). This significance was maintained at 12 weeks. Thirty-four percent of participants in the intervention group rated themselves as 'confident' with regards to prescribing for older patients post-intervention compared with 12% in the control group. CONCLUSION: A short e-learning module focused on geriatric pharmacotherapy can significantly improve doctors' prescribing knowledge and confidence with regards to older patients. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02405975.
Authors: Jane M Garbutt; Gabrielle Highstein; Donna B Jeffe; William Claiborne Dunagan; Victoria J Fraser Journal: Acad Med Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: David O'Sullivan; Denis O'Mahony; Marie N O'Connor; Paul Gallagher; Shane Cullinan; Richard O'Sullivan; James Gallagher; Joseph Eustace; Stephen Byrne Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Michael A Steinman; C Seth Landefeld; Gary E Rosenthal; Daniel Berthenthal; Saunak Sen; Peter J Kaboli Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: David A Cook; Anthony J Levinson; Sarah Garside; Denise M Dupras; Patricia J Erwin; Victor M Montori Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-09-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Michiel J Bakkum; Jelle Tichelaar; Anne Wellink; Milan C Richir; Michiel A van Agtmael Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 6.875