Literature DB >> 28258528

The role of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in penile fracture mapping for modified surgical repair.

Mohammad Zare Mehrjardi1,2, Mohsen Darabi3, Seyed Morteza Bagheri3, Koosha Kamali4, Bijan Bijan5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of penile fracture and preoperative mapping for modified surgical repair.
METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients were included in the study prospectively over 29 months (from February 2014 to June 2016). US examination and MRI were performed on all patients and interpreted by two expert radiologists independently. The location of the defect in tunica albuginea was mapped onto a designed scheme preoperatively using each imaging modality. The detection rate, as well as agreement between preoperative radiologic mapping and surgical outcomes, was determined for each modality.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 28 ± 7.5 years. The most common etiology was intercourse (88%). The most common location of tunica albuginea rupture was mid-shaft of the penis (60%), and the mean length of tunica defects in their greatest dimension was 13.5 ± 3.95 mm. All patients had associated hematoma, but no urethral injury was detected. The detection rate of US and MRI was 88 and 100%, respectively. US mapped the tear location correctly in 18 patients [61 out of 75 items (81%); κ = 0.66], while MRI mapped it precisely in 23 patients [73 out of 75 items (97%); κ = 0.95].
CONCLUSION: Both modalities are extremely helpful for the diagnosis of penile fracture. Considering the cost-efficiency and accessibility of ultrasonography, US is recommended as the first-line tool for both diagnosis and preoperative mapping. MRI may be used as a complementary study in the patients for whom US fails to visualize or precisely define the tunica defect.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Medical imaging; Modified repair; Penile fracture; Preoperative mapping; Radiology; Ultrasound (US)

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28258528     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-017-1550-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  21 in total

Review 1.  Penile fracture.

Authors:  G L Brotzman
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct

2.  MR imaging in acute fracture of the penis.

Authors:  F Boudghene; R Chhem; C Wallays; J M Bigot
Journal:  Urol Radiol       Date:  1992

3.  Current treatment options for penile fractures.

Authors:  Gregory S Jack; Isla Garraway; Richard Reznichek; Jacob Rajfer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

4.  Sonographic evaluation of penile trauma.

Authors:  Shweta Bhatt; Ercan Kocakoc; Deborah J Rubens; Allen D Seftel; Vikram S Dogra
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Fracture of penis: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  H C Ruckle; H R Hadley; P D Lui
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 6.  Fracture of the penis.

Authors:  N Eke
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Fracture of the penis.

Authors:  A Jallu; N A Wani; P A Rashid
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Ultrasound evaluation of penile fractures.

Authors:  Sg Kachewar; Ds Kulkarni
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2011-10-01

9.  Fracture of the Penis: Demonstration by MRI with Surgical Correlation.

Authors:  Freddie R Swain; Michelle Udeschi; Milton F Armm; Joseph A Gagliardi
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2015-12-07

10.  Penile Fracture: Our Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  Rajkumar Singha Mahapatra; Anup Kumar Kundu; Dilip Kumar Pal
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.400

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Management of penile fracture.

Authors:  Jesse Ory; Greg Bailly
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Older age and a large tunical tear may be predictors of increased erectile dysfunction rates following penile fracture surgery.

Authors:  Mazhar Ortac; Faruk Özgor; Ufuk Caglar; Abdullah Esmeray; Metin Savun; Ömer Sarılar
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.896

3.  Suspected penile fracture: to operate or not to operate?

Authors:  Ian S Metzler; Amanda B Reed-Maldonado; Tom F Lue
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-10

4.  Comparison of uterine and ovarian stromal blood flow in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome.

Authors:  Ladan Younesi; Zeinab Safarpour Lima; Azadeh Akbari Sene; Zahra Hosseini Jebelli; Ghazaleh Amjad
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.335

5.  Efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging in symptomatic and asymptomatic multiple sclerotic plaques.

Authors:  Farzad Tahmasebi Arashloo; Farnaz Fahimi Hanzaei; Behnaz Sedighi; Ghazaleh Amjad; Ladan Younesi
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2019-07

6.  Diagnostic performance of MRI and US in suspicion of penile fracture.

Authors:  Paul Spiesecke; Josef Mang; Thomas Fischer; Bernd Hamm; Markus H Lerchbaumer
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-03

7.  Marshall and Rotterdam Computed Tomography scores in predicting early deaths after brain trauma.

Authors:  Mahyar Mohammadifard; Kazem Ghaemi; Hamed Hanif; Gholamreza Sharifzadeh; Marzieh Haghparast
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2018-07-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.