Literature DB >> 28258449

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: Predictive Factors for Weight Loss and Band Removal After More than 10 Years' Follow-Up in a Single University Unit.

Pasquale Tammaro1, Boris Hansel2, Andrea Police1, Marina Kousouri3, Christophe Magnan4, Jean Pierre Marmuse1, Konstantinos Arapis5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Weight loss and overall outcomes following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) are more variable than with other bariatric procedures. Our aim was to investigate the predictive value of certain parameters in a cohort of 794 patients with 10 years' minimum follow-up after LAGB.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 794 patients undergoing LAGB performed by the authors between April 1996 and December 2004. We collected patients' data on weight loss and band-related complications and performed logistic regression modelling and calculated Kaplan-Meier curves for band preservation.
RESULTS: The follow-up rate at 10 years was 90.4%. The mean follow-up duration was 15.1 years (range, 120-228 months). Overall band removal with or without conversion or replacement was required in 304 (38.2%) patients. The mean survival time of the band was 148.4 months (95% confidence interval: 138.3-167.4), and there was no difference in the rate of removal by operative technique (p = 0.7). The highest rate of band removal occurred in female patients (p = 0.05), those with BMI > 50 kg/m2 (p = 0.005) and in those <40 years of age (p = 0.04). For patients with the band in situ, the success rate was significantly lower in patients with initial BMI > 50 kg/m2. Conversely, differences in success rate were not statistically significant for age (using 50 years as the cut-off), technique or sex.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher rates of removal occurred in women, younger patients and those with BMI > 50 kg/m2. Regardless of these criteria, the rate of band removal for complications rose over time. Patients should be informed of the high risk of the need for band removal long-term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28258449     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-3922-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  34 in total

1.  Laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a comparative study of 1,200 cases.

Authors:  Laurent Biertho; Rudolf Steffen; Thomas Ricklin; Fritz F Horber; Alfons Pomp; William B Inabnet; Daniel Herron; Michel Gagner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  High failure rate of the laparoscopic-adjustable gastric band as a primary bariatric procedure.

Authors:  Tammy Kindel; Emily Martin; Eric Hungness; Alex Nagle
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.734

4.  Impact of age, sex and body mass index on outcomes at four years after gastric banding.

Authors:  Ruth Branson; Natascha Potoczna; Ricarda Brunotte; Grazyna Piec; Thomas Ricklin; Rudolf Steffen; Fritz F Horber
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2005 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Long-term results of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in patients lost to follow-up.

Authors:  W W te Riele; D Boerma; M J Wiezer; I H M Borel Rinkes; B van Ramshorst
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Patient characteristics impacting excess weight loss following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

Authors:  Wai Yip Chau; Hans J Schmidt; Wael Kouli; Dan Davis; Annette Wasielewski; Garth H Ballantyne
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Long-Term Follow-Up of Gastric Banding 10 Years and Beyond.

Authors:  Martha R Trujillo; Dominik Muller; Jeannette D Widmer; Rene Warschkow; Markus K Muller
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Physical activity predicts weight loss following gastric bypass surgery: findings from a support group survey.

Authors:  Garry Welch; Cheryl Wesolowski; Bernadette Piepul; Jay Kuhn; John Romanelli; Jane Garb
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 9.  Surgery for obesity.

Authors:  Jill L Colquitt; Joanna Picot; Emma Loveman; Andrew J Clegg
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15

10.  A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in healthy individuals.

Authors:  M D Mifflin; S T St Jeor; L A Hill; B J Scott; S A Daugherty; Y O Koh
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 7.045

View more
  2 in total

1.  The fate of laparoscopic adjustable gastric band removal

Authors:  Vanessa Falk; Caroline Sheppard; Aliyah Kanji; Daniel Birch; Shazeer Karmali; Christopher de Gara
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  A Novel Full Sense Device to Treat Obesity in a Porcine Model: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Jung-Hoon Park; Nader Bakheet; Hee Kyong Na; Jae Yong Jeon; Sung Hwan Yoon; Kun Yung Kim; Wang Zhe; Do Hoon Kim; Hwoon-Yong Jung; Ho-Young Song
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.129

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.