Literature DB >> 28258384

[Laparoscopic pancreatic resection].

D Bausch1, T Keck2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND
PURPOSE: Despite being technically challenging, laparoscopic surgical procedures are increasingly being used also in pancreatic surgery. This review attempts to evaluate these procedures based on the currently available literature against the background of the high mortality of pancreatic surgery observed nationwide and the as yet unclear oncological validation of these procedures.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Recently published retrospective cohort and register trials have evaluated not only perioperative outcome but also long-term survival after laparoscopic pancreatic resection. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic interventions are increasingly being used for treatment of malignant tumors of the pancreas. The advantages of laparoscopy, such as less intraoperative blood loss, reduced postoperative pain and a shorter duration of hospital stay, have all been demonstrated in retrospective trials. Equivalent long-term survival after oncological laparoscopic pancreatic surgery compared to open procedures was also observed in these trials; however, mortality even after laparoscopic pancreatic surgery was found to be significantly increased in low-volume centers. Prospective trials are still needed to prove adequate oncological treatment. Laparoskopische Verfahren haben sich in den letzten Jahren in fast allen Bereichen der Chirurgie quasi zum Standard entwickelt und werden von Patienten zunehmend nachgefragt. Die kosmetischen Ergebnisse sind deutlich besser als bei konventionellem Vorgehen und sie reduzieren unter anderem den postoperativen Schmerz, Schmerzmittelbedarf sowie den Krankenhausaufenthalt [29]. Daher ist es wenig überraschend, dass minimal-invasive Verfahren auch bei technisch hochkomplexen Eingriffen, wie z. B. am Pankreas, zunehmend eingesetzt werden. Allerdings wird ihr Einsatz hier noch immer kontrovers diskutiert.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Long term survival; Low volume hospitals; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Oncologic treatment; Pancreatic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28258384     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-017-0398-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  30 in total

1.  Metaanalysis of trials comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomies.

Authors:  Giuseppe R Nigri; Alan S Rosman; Niccolò Petrucciani; Alessandro Fancellu; Michele Pisano; Luigi Zorcolo; Giovanni Ramacciato; Marcovalerio Melis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  A L Warshaw
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1988-05

4.  Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resection and hybrid open reconstruction via pancreatogastrostomy.

Authors:  Tobias Keck; Simon Kuesters; Ulrich Wellner; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; Wojciech Konrad Karcz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreatic head/uncinate: resection or enucleation?

Authors:  Olivier Turrini; C Max Schmidt; Henry A Pitt; Jerome Guiramand; Juan R Aguilar-Saavedra; Shadi Aboudi; Keith D Lillemoe; Jean Robert Delpero
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Outcome and costs of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy during the initial learning curve vs laparotomy.

Authors:  Chun-Lu Tan; Hao Zhang; Bing Peng; Ke-Zhou Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Risk of cancer following splenectomy.

Authors:  M S Linet; O Nyrén; G Gridley; L Mellemkjaer; J K McLaughlin; J H Olsen; H O Adami; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1996-05-29       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: long-term results at a single institution.

Authors:  John A Stauffer; Alessandro Coppola; Diego Villacreses; Kabir Mody; Elizabeth Johnson; Zhuo Li; Horacio J Asbun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches?

Authors:  Kristopher P Croome; Michael B Farnell; Florencia G Que; K Marie Reid-Lombardo; Mark J Truty; David M Nagorney; Michael L Kendrick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Deniece Riviere; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; David A Kooby; Charles M Vollmer; Marc G H Besselink; Brian R Davidson; Cornelis J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-04
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Hybrid Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy. A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Miljana Vladimirov; Dirk Bausch; Hubert J Stein; Tobias Keck; Ulrich Wellner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.