Literature DB >> 28258334

The Occupy Central (Umbrella) movement and mental health distress in the Hong Kong general public: political movements and concerns as potential structural risk factors of population mental health.

Joseph T F Lau1,2, Yoona Kim3, Anise M S Wu4, Zixin Wang3, Bishan Huang5, Phoenix K H Mo3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Political tension, as expressed by mass movements such as the Occupy Central movement (2014) in Hong Kong, is a potential but understudied structural factor of population mental health.
METHODS: A random population-based telephone survey anonymously interviewed 344 Hong Kong Chinese adults aged 18-65 years during the 2 weeks since the termination date of the 2-month-long Occupy Central movement (15/12/2014). Linear regression models were fit using mental distress (depression, anxiety and negative mood) and self-perceived changes in mood/sleeping quality as dependent variables.
RESULTS: Prevalence of participation in the movement was 10.5% (self), 17.7% (family members/relatives), and 34.0% (peers); 8.5% had participated for ≥2 days. Young age, but not participation, was associated with mental distress. In adjusted analysis, three types of responses to the movement (worry about safety, negative emotional responses to media reports, and conflicts with peers about the movement) and emotional responses to local political situations were significantly associated with all/some of the dependent variables related to mental distress. The variable on emotions toward local political situations was correlated with the three responses to the movement; it fully mediated the associations between such responses and mental distress.
CONCLUSION: Many citizens participated in the movement, which was led by youths and might have increased the general public's mental distress. Negative personal responses to the movement and emotions toward political situations were potential risk factors. As the political tension would last and political pessimism is globally found, politics may have become a regular and persistent structural risk factor negatively affecting population mental health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chinese; Depression; Mental health; Political movement; Public health

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28258334     DOI: 10.1007/s00127-017-1340-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol        ISSN: 0933-7954            Impact factor:   4.328


  28 in total

1.  Psychological distress among adolescents in Chengdu, Sichuan at 1 month after the 2008 Sichuan earthquake.

Authors:  Joseph T F Lau; Xiaonan Yu; Jianxin Zhang; Winnie W S Mak; Kai Chow Choi; Wacy W S Lui; Jianxin Zhang; Emily Y Y Chan
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 2.  Church-based health promotion interventions: evidence and lessons learned.

Authors:  Marci Kramish Campbell; Marlyn Allicock Hudson; Ken Resnicow; Natasha Blakeney; Amy Paxton; Monica Baskin
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 21.981

3.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Impacts of media coverage on the community stress level in Hong Kong after the tsunami on 26 December 2004.

Authors:  Joseph T F Lau; Mason Lau; Jean H Kim; Hi Yi Tsui
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Assessing mental health outcomes of political violence and civil unrest in Peru.

Authors:  Jacques Tremblay; Duncan Pedersen; Consuelo Errazuriz
Journal:  Int J Soc Psychiatry       Date:  2009-07-10

Review 6.  Delayed posttraumatic stress disorder: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of prospective studies.

Authors:  Geert E Smid; Trudy T M Mooren; Roos C van der Mast; Berthold P R Gersons; Rolf J Kleber
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 4.384

7.  Validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for depression screening among Chinese Americans.

Authors:  Albert Yeung; Freddy Fung; Shu-Ching Yu; Sienna Vorono; Mary Ly; Shirley Wu; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.735

8.  Social disadvantage and individual vulnerability: a longitudinal investigation of welfare receipt and mental health in Australia.

Authors:  Kim M Kiely; Peter Butterworth
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 5.744

9.  Effects of depressive symptoms and family satisfaction on health related quality of life: the Hong Kong FAMILY study.

Authors:  Hairong Nan; Paul H Lee; Michael Y Ni; Brandford H Y Chan; Tai-Hing Lam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Threat to democracy: Physical and mental health impact of democracy movement in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Wai Kai Hou; Brian J Hall; Daphna Canetti; Kam Man Lau; Sin Man Ng; Stevan E Hobfoll
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 4.839

View more
  3 in total

1.  Exposure to socio-political unrest and wellbeing of older people in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Daniel W L Lai; Emma H S Liu; Elsie C W Yan; Jessica J Li; Vincent W P Lee
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.070

2.  Vicarious trauma, social media and recovery in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Margo Turnbull; Bernadette Watson; Ying Jin; Beatrice Lok; Alexandra Sanderson
Journal:  Asian J Psychiatr       Date:  2020-04-10

3.  Competing or Interactive Effect Between Perceived Response Efficacy of Governmental Social Distancing Behaviors and Personal Freedom on Social Distancing Behaviors in the Chinese Adult General Population in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Yanqiu Yu; Joseph Tak Fai Lau; Mason Man Chun Lau
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2022-04-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.