Literature DB >> 28258330

Good clinical and MRI outcome after arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage repair in the knee.

Rainer Siebold1,2, Ferzan Suezer3,4, Benjamin Schmitt5,6, Siegfried Trattnig7, Marco Essig5,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the clinical outcome and cartilage regeneration after all-arthroscopic Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI) using chondrospheres® (ACT3D) for the treatment of full-size articular cartilage lesions at the knee.
METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients treated by all-arthroscopic ACI for full-size articular cartilage lesions in an otherwise healthy knee were enrolled. The defects were located on the femoral condyles (n = 18), in the trochlea (n = 7) and at the patella (n = 5). Follow-up consisted of a clinical evaluation with assessment of subjective scores. Patient satisfaction was evaluated on a visual analog scale (VAS). 3-Tesla MRI and T2 mapping of the operated and the contralateral healthy knees were included to control the quality of the regenerated cartilage. The MOCART score was assessed by three blinded independent radiologists.
RESULTS: At the mean follow-up of 3 years ± 10.2 months 26 of the 30 patients (86.6%) were subjectively highly satisfied with the surgical result and assured they would undergo the same procedure again. The mean Lysholm score increased to 77.7 ± 14.6, the mean subjective IKDC significantly to 84.2 ± 5.6 (p < 0.05) and all five subgroups of the KOOS improved significantly (p < 0.05). The subjective outcome was not influenced by the duration of symptoms, age, location, size of defects nor dose of spheroids. The modified MOCART score was a mean of 60 ± 21 (0-80) points. Twenty-four patients (82.7%) were rated higher than 60 points. T2 mapping documented similar cartilage quality of the area of the ACI and the same location at the contralateral knee. Three patients had a MOCART score of 0 with few or no cartilage regeneration on MRI and were considered as failure of the ACI.
CONCLUSION: In this small cohort of 30 patients, minimal invasive all-arthroscopic ACT 3D using spheroids led to convincing clinical short-to-mid-term results with a significant increase in patients quality of life, satisfaction, reduction of pain, and improvement in knee function. The high morphologic integrity and quality of the ACI was reconfirmed by the Mocart Score and T2 mapping. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACI; ACT3D; Autologous chondrocyte implantation; Cartilage defect; Knee; MOCART; Spheroid; T2 mapping

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28258330     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4491-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  53 in total

1.  MRI and clinical evaluation of collagen-covered autologous chondrocyte implantation (CACI) at two years.

Authors:  W B Robertson; D Fick; D J Wood; J M Linklater; M H Zheng; T R Ackland
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Arthroscopic surgical management of osteochondritis dissecans of the knee.

Authors:  J W Ewing; S J Voto
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 3.  Cartilage repair: generations of autologous chondrocyte transplantation.

Authors:  Stefan Marlovits; Philip Zeller; Philipp Singer; Christoph Resinger; Vilmos Vécsei
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  A prospective randomized clinical study of mosaic osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of osteochondral defects in the knee joint in young athletes.

Authors:  Rimtautas Gudas; Romas J Kalesinskas; Vytautas Kimtys; Edgaras Stankevicius; Vytautas Toliusis; Giedrius Bernotavicius; Alfredas Smailys
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 5.  The response of articular cartilage to mechanical injury.

Authors:  H J Mankin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Two- to 9-year outcome after autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the knee.

Authors:  L Peterson; T Minas; M Brittberg; A Nilsson; E Sjögren-Jansson; A Lindahl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation improves patellofemoral cartilage treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Jack Farr
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects.

Authors:  E B Hunziker
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation in chondral defects of the knee with a type I/III collagen membrane: a prospective study with a 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Matthias Steinwachs; Peter C Kreuz
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  24 in total

1.  Biophysical stimulation improves clinical results of matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte implantation in the treatment of chondral lesions of the knee.

Authors:  Marco Collarile; Andrea Sambri; Giada Lullini; Matteo Cadossi; Claudio Zorzi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Extracellular Matrix Determines Biomechanical Properties of Chondrospheres during Their Maturation In Vitro.

Authors:  Nikolai P Omelyanenko; Pavel A Karalkin; Elena A Bulanova; Elizaveta V Koudan; Vladislav A Parfenov; Sergei A Rodionov; Alisa D Knyazeva; Vladimir A Kasyanov; Igor I Babichenko; Tamara Z Chkadua; Yusef D Khesuani; Anna A Gryadunova; Vladimir A Mironov
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Arthroscopic gel-type autologous chondrocyte implantation presents histologic evidence of regenerating hyaline-like cartilage in the knee with articular cartilage defect.

Authors:  Tae-Hwan Yoon; Min Jung; Chong-Hyuk Choi; Hyoung-Sik Kim; Young-Han Lee; Yun-Seok Choi; Sung-Jae Kim; Sung-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Time-Dependent Change in Cartilage Repair Tissue Evaluated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging up to 2 years after Atelocollagen-Assisted Autologous Cartilage Transplantation: Data from the CaTCh Study.

Authors:  Masashi Shinohara; Ryuichiro Akagi; Atsuya Watanabe; Yuki Kato; Yusuke Sato; Tsuguo Morikawa; Junichi Iwasaki; Koichi Nakagawa; Yorikazu Akatsu; Seiji Ohtori; Takahisa Sasho
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (mACI) versus autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) for chondral defects of the knee: a systematic review.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Jörg Eschweiler; Christian Götze; Arne Driessen; Markus Tingart; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 5.841

6.  Hyaluronic Acid In Vitro Response: Viability and Proliferation Profile of Human Chondrocytes in 3D-Based Culture.

Authors:  Leonardo do Nascimento; Natália Fontana Nicoletti; Manuela Peletti-Figueiró; Daniel Marinowic; Asdrubal Falavigna
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Accurate Reporting of Concomitant Procedures Is Highly Variable in Studies Investigating Knee Cartilage Restoration.

Authors:  William L Sheppard; Betina B Hinckel; Armin Arshi; Seth L Sherman; Kristofer J Jones
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Long-Term Evaluation of Allogenic Chondrocyte-Loaded PVA-PCL IPN Scaffolds for Articular Cartilage Repair in Rabbits.

Authors:  Karthikeyan Rajagopal; Vivek Dutt; B Balakumar; Sanjay K Chilbule; Noel Walter; Prabha D Nair; Vrisha Madhuri
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 9.  Arthroscopy versus mini-arthrotomy approach for matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee: a systematic review.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Jörg Eschweiler; Filippo Spiezia; Bryan J M van de Wall; Matthias Knobe; Markus Tingart; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2021-06-16

10.  Role of Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation with Spheroids in the Treatment of Large Chondral Defects in the Knee: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lucienne Angela Vonk; Giulietta Roël; Jacques Hernigou; Christian Kaps; Philippe Hernigou
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.