Literature DB >> 28257731

Comparative evaluation of salivary bisphenol A levels in patients wearing vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers: An in-vivo study.

Akila Srinivasan Raghavan1, Haritha Pottipalli Sathyanarayana1, Vignesh Kailasam2, Sridevi Padmanabhan1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aims of the study were to evaluate and compare the bisphenol A (BPA) levels in saliva in patients using vacuum-formed retainers or Hawley retainers.
METHODS: Forty-five patients who had completed their fixed orthodontic treatment and were entering the retention phase were randomly allocated into 1 of 3 groups: vacuum-formed retainer, Hawley retainer fabricated by heat cure, and Hawley retainer fabricated by chemical cure. Saliva samples were collected immediately before placement, within 1 hour after placement, 1 week and 1 month after placement. Statistical analyses were performed by using 2-way analysis of variance and post-hoc multiple-comparisons Tukey HSD tests.
RESULTS: Statistically significant BPA levels in saliva were found for all groups (P ≤0.05). The highest levels were noted in the vacuum-formed retainer group, followed by Hawley retainers fabricated by chemical cure; the lowest levels were found with Hawley retainers fabricated by heat cure.
CONCLUSIONS: With many options available for removable retainers, clinicians should consider the BPA release from these retainers; a Hawley retainer fabricated by heat cure is a favorable choice.
Copyright © 2016 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28257731     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.07.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  7 in total

1.  Level of satisfaction in the use of the wraparound Hawley and thermoplastic maxillary retainers.

Authors:  Adenilson Silva Chagas; Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas; Rodrigo Hermont Cançado; Fabricio Pinelli Valarelli; Luiz Filiphe Gonçalves Canuto; Renata Cristina Gobbi de Oliveira; Ricardo Cesar Gobbi de Oliveira
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Aligners, Environmental Contamination, and The Role of Orthodontics.

Authors:  Maria Perpétua Mota Freitas
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Once Resin Composites and Dental Sealants Release Bisphenol-A, How Might This Affect Our Clinical Management?-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anabela Baptista Paula; Debbie Toste; Alfredo Marinho; Inês Amaro; Carlos-Miguel Marto; Ana Coelho; Manuel Marques-Ferreira; Eunice Carrilho
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Leaching of Different Clear Aligner Systems: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Aseel Alhendi; Rita Khounganian; Abdullazez Almudhi; Syed Rizwan Ahamad
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-14

5.  A novel high sensitivity UPLC-MS/MS method for the evaluation of bisphenol A leaching from dental materials.

Authors:  Siemon De Nys; Eveline Putzeys; Philippe Vervliet; Adrian Covaci; Imke Boonen; Marc Elskens; Jeroen Vanoirbeek; Lode Godderis; Bart Van Meerbeek; Kirsten L Van Landuyt; Radu Corneliu Duca
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Safety Considerations for Thermoplastic-Type Appliances Used as Orthodontic Aligners or Retainers. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and In-Vitro Research.

Authors:  Anna Iliadi; Despina Koletsi; Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Theodore Eliades
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 7.  The Biological Effects of 3D Resins Used in Orthodontics: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Inês Francisco; Anabela Baptista Paula; Madalena Ribeiro; Filipa Marques; Raquel Travassos; Catarina Nunes; Flávia Pereira; Carlos Miguel Marto; Eunice Carrilho; Francisco Vale
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.