Literature DB >> 28257617

Examination of the Validity of a Clinical Prediction Rule to Identify Patients With Shoulder Pain Likely to Benefit From Cervicothoracic Manipulation.

Paul E Mintken, Amy W McDevitt, Lori A Michener, Robert E Boyles, Amber R Beardslee, Scott A Burns, Matthew D Haberl, Lauren A Hinrichs, Joshua A Cleland.   

Abstract

Study Design Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Background Prognostic variables identifying patients with shoulder pain who are likely to respond to cervicothoracic manipulation have been reported; however, they have yet to be validated. Objective To examine the validity of previously reported prognostic variables in predicting which patients with shoulder pain will respond to cervicothoracic manipulation. Methods Participants (n = 140) with a report of shoulder pain were randomly assigned to receive either 2 sessions of range-of-motion exercises plus 6 sessions of stretching and strengthening exercises (exercise group), or 2 sessions of cervicothoracic manipulation and range-of-motion exercises followed by 6 sessions of stretching and strengthening exercise (manipulative-therapy-plus-exercise group). Outcomes of disability (Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire) and pain (numeric pain-rating scale) were collected at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, and 6 months. Time, treatment group, status of predictor variables, and 2-way and 3-way interactions were analyzed using linear mixed models with repeated measures. Results There were no significant 3-way interactions for either disability (P = .27) or pain scores (P = .70) for time, group, and predictor status for any of the predictor variables. Conclusion The results of the current study did not validate the previously identified prognostic variables; therefore, we cannot support using these in clinical practice. Further updating of the existing prediction rule may be warranted and could potentially result in new prognostic variables and improved generalizability. Limitations of the study were a mean duration of symptoms of greater than 2 years and a loss to follow-up of 19% at 6 months. Level of Evidence Prognosis, level 1b. Trial prospectively registered March 30, 2012 at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01571674). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(4):252-260. Epub 3 Mar 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7100.

Entities:  

Keywords:  prognosis; prospective cohort; shoulder pain; validation study

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28257617     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  5 in total

1.  Clinical prediction rule for early recovery of knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tetsuya Amano; Ryo Tanaka; Shigeharu Tanaka
Journal:  Phys Ther Res       Date:  2020-09-28

2.  CAVITATION SOUNDS DURING CERVICOTHORACIC SPINAL MANIPULATION.

Authors:  James Dunning; Firas Mourad; Andrea Zingoni; Raffaele Iorio; Thomas Perreault; Noah Zacharko; César Fernández de Las Peñas; Raymond Butts; Joshua A Cleland
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-08

3.  Exploring indicators of extremity pain of spinal source as identified by Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT): a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ravi Rastogi; Richard Rosedale; Josh Kidd; Greg Lynch; Georg Supp; Shawn M Robbins
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2022-01-25

4.  Directional preference of the extremity: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Joseph R Maccio; Lindsay Carlton; Kimberly Levesque; Joseph G Maccio; Leanne Egan
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2018-08-13

5.  Cervicothoracic Manipulation Techniques Reviewed Utilizing Three-Dimensional Spine Model.

Authors:  Ryan C McCoy; Edsel Bittencourt; William Clifton
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-10-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.