| Literature DB >> 28257430 |
Luis R Pertierra, Kevin A Hughes, Greta C Vega, Miguel Á Olalla-Tárraga.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168280.].Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28257430 PMCID: PMC5336286 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173649
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Percentage of the estimated global population of Antarctic bird species found within IBAs also designated as Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (based upon data contained in [3]: Harris et al, 2015).
| Name | Latin name | Red list status | Global population (pairs) | Percentage of estimated global population (pairs) within ASPAs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >1% | 1–5% | 5–10% | 10–20% | >20% | ||||
| Emperor penguin | Near threatened | 238,000 | ● | |||||
| Gentoo penguin | Near threatened | 387,000 | ● | |||||
| Chinstrap penguin | Least concern | 2,666,667 | ● | |||||
| Adélie penguin | Near threatened | 3,790,000 | ● | |||||
| Macaroni penguin | Vulnerable | 6,300,000 | ||||||
| Southern giant petrel | Least concern | 50,000 | ● | |||||
| Antarctic petrel | Least concern | 3–7,000,000 | ○ | ○ | ||||
| Cape petrel | Least concern | 670,000 | ● | |||||
| Snow petrel | Least concern | 1,300,000 | ● | |||||
| Southern fulmar | Least concern | 1,000,000 | ● | |||||
| Antarctic prion | Least concern | 16,600,000 | ||||||
| Wilson’s storm-petrel | Least concern | 4–10,000,000 | ● | |||||
| Black-bellied storm-petrel | Least concern | 160,000 | ||||||
| Imperial (Antarctic) shag | Least concern | 13,333 | ● | |||||
| Brown skua | Least concern | 3–7500 | ||||||
| South polar skua | Least concern | 3–7500 | ● | |||||
| Kelp gull | Least concern | 10–20,000 | ○ | ○ | ||||
| Antarctic tern | Least concern | 36,666 | ● | |||||
| Snowy (greater) sheathbill | Least concern | 10,000 | ● | |||||
● Percentage value is within the range indicated
○ Global bird populations (pairs) are not accurately known for all species (see column 4). Where the possible percentage population within ASPAs may be within two percentage ranges, both are indicated with this symbol.
1 Percentages are likely to be conservative estimates, as data for each species within all ASPAs were not available. This may be particularly true for species with colonies found in remote locations and not subject to regular counts. Values are derived from counts of bird pairs rather than individuals (see [3]: Harris et al., 2015, pg. 4). Smaller numbers or lower concentrations of bird species are also likely to breed within other ASPAs not designated as IBAs.
2 Species recorded and possibly breeding within at least one ASPA, but numbers are not available.