Literature DB >> 28257430

Correction: High Resolution Spatial Mapping of Human Footprint across Antarctica and Its Implications for the Strategic Conservation of Avifauna.

Luis R Pertierra, Kevin A Hughes, Greta C Vega, Miguel Á Olalla-Tárraga.   

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168280.].

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28257430      PMCID: PMC5336286          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Table 3 contains an error in the estimation of the number of global population (pairs) of Chinstrap penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica) within ASPAs. It should read as 5–10%. Please see the corrected Table 3 here.
Table 3

Percentage of the estimated global population of Antarctic bird species found within IBAs also designated as Antarctic Specially Protected Areas (based upon data contained in [3]: Harris et al, 2015).

NameLatin nameRed list statusGlobal population (pairs)1Percentage of estimated global population (pairs) within ASPAs
>1%1–5%5–10%10–20%>20%
Emperor penguinAptenodytes forsteriNear threatened238,000
Gentoo penguinPygoscelis papuaNear threatened387,000
Chinstrap penguinPygoscelis antarcticaLeast concern2,666,667
Adélie penguinPygoscelis adeliaeNear threatened3,790,000
Macaroni penguinEudyptes chrysolophusVulnerable6,300,0002
Southern giant petrelMacronectes giganteusLeast concern50,000
Antarctic petrelThalassoica antarcticaLeast concern3–7,000,000
Cape petrelDaption capenseLeast concern670,000
Snow petrelPagodroma niveaLeast concern1,300,000
Southern fulmarFulmarus glacialoidesLeast concern1,000,000
Antarctic prionPachyptila desolataLeast concern16,600,0002
Wilson’s storm-petrelOceanites oceanicusLeast concern4–10,000,000
Black-bellied storm-petrelFregetta tropicaLeast concern160,0002
Imperial (Antarctic) shagPhalacrocorax [atriceps] bransfieldensisLeast concern13,333
Brown skuaCatharacta antarcticaLeast concern3–75002
South polar skuaCatharacta maccormickiLeast concern3–7500
Kelp gullLarus dominicanusLeast concern10–20,000
Antarctic ternSterna vittataLeast concern36,666
Snowy (greater) sheathbillChionis albusLeast concern10,000

● Percentage value is within the range indicated

○ Global bird populations (pairs) are not accurately known for all species (see column 4). Where the possible percentage population within ASPAs may be within two percentage ranges, both are indicated with this symbol.

1 Percentages are likely to be conservative estimates, as data for each species within all ASPAs were not available. This may be particularly true for species with colonies found in remote locations and not subject to regular counts. Values are derived from counts of bird pairs rather than individuals (see [3]: Harris et al., 2015, pg. 4). Smaller numbers or lower concentrations of bird species are also likely to breed within other ASPAs not designated as IBAs.

2 Species recorded and possibly breeding within at least one ASPA, but numbers are not available.

● Percentage value is within the range indicated ○ Global bird populations (pairs) are not accurately known for all species (see column 4). Where the possible percentage population within ASPAs may be within two percentage ranges, both are indicated with this symbol. 1 Percentages are likely to be conservative estimates, as data for each species within all ASPAs were not available. This may be particularly true for species with colonies found in remote locations and not subject to regular counts. Values are derived from counts of bird pairs rather than individuals (see [3]: Harris et al., 2015, pg. 4). Smaller numbers or lower concentrations of bird species are also likely to breed within other ASPAs not designated as IBAs. 2 Species recorded and possibly breeding within at least one ASPA, but numbers are not available.
  1 in total

1.  High Resolution Spatial Mapping of Human Footprint across Antarctica and Its Implications for the Strategic Conservation of Avifauna.

Authors:  Luis R Pertierra; Kevin A Hughes; Greta C Vega; Miguel Á Olalla-Tárraga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial resistance in Antarctica: is it still a pristine environment?

Authors:  K Hwengwere; H Paramel Nair; K A Hughes; L S Peck; M S Clark; C A Walker
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 16.837

2.  The rising threat of climate change for arthropods from Earth's cold regions: Taxonomic rather than native status drives species sensitivity.

Authors:  David Renault; Camille Leclerc; Marc-Antoine Colleu; Aude Boutet; Hoel Hotte; Hervé Colinet; Steven L Chown; Peter Convey
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 13.211

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.