| Literature DB >> 28257051 |
Yang Yang1, Tian Gao2, Mengjun Xu3, Jie Dong4, Hanxiao Li5, Pengfei Wang6, Gezi Li7, Tiancai Guo8, Guozhang Kang9, Yonghua Wang10,11.
Abstract
ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase), the key enzyme in starch synthesis, consists of two small subunits and two large subunits with cytosolic and plastidial isoforms. In our previous study, a cDNA sequence encoding the plastidial small subunit (TaAGPS1b) of AGPase in grains of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was isolated and the protein subunit encoded by this gene was characterized as a truncated transit peptide (about 50% shorter than those of other plant AGPS1bs). In the present study, TaAGPS1b was fused with green fluorescent protein (GFP) in rice protoplast cells, and confocal fluorescence microscopy observations revealed that like other AGPS1b containing the normal transit peptide, TaAGPS1b-GFP was localized in chloroplasts. TaAGPS1b was further overexpressed in a Chinese bread wheat cultivar, and the transgenic wheat lines exhibited a significant increase in endosperm AGPase activities, starch contents, and grain weights. These suggested that TaAGPS1b subunit was targeted into plastids by its truncated transit peptide and it could play an important role in starch synthesis in bread wheat grains.Entities:
Keywords: AGPase; Triticum aestivum L.; plastidial small subunit; starch
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28257051 PMCID: PMC6155376 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22030386
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Subcellular localization of FJ643609-GFP (A) and EU586278-GFP (B) fusion proteins into rice protoplasts. Notes: (1) Full-length TaAGPS1b-FJ643609 and -EU586278 cDNA sequences were fused in-frame to GFP, respectively, and expressed under the control of the CaMV35S promoter. (2) All images were recorded at the same sensitivity and scale. (3) Each set of four images shows the same cell. Bars = 5 μm.
Figure 2Analyses of wheat lines transformed with pWM101-EU586278 using PCR and southern blot methods. (A) PCR analysis of genomic DNA with Hyg gene. M, DL2000 marker; P, plasmid pWM101-EU586278 (positive control); WT, the untransformed wild plant (negative control); lines 1–15, wheat plants transformed with pWM101-EU586278; (B) Southern blot. Lines 1–13, thirteen randomly selected PCR positive lines; WT, the untransformed wild plant (negative control); P, the purified probe product (positive control).
Figure 3Transcript levels of TaAGPS1b-EU586278 (A) and AGPase activities (B) in endosperm of the developing grains of WT and transgenic wheat lines. Notes: (1) Transcript levels at 10, 15 and 20 days after anthesis were measured by qPCR using β-actin gene as internal control. (2) WT, the untransformed wild plant; S7 and S10, the two independent TaAGPS1b-EU586278 T3 transgenic wheat lines. (3) Each value is the mean ± SD of three independent biological replicates. Different letters represented statistical significance at p < 0.05.
Comparisons of grain characterizations between WT and transgenic wheat lines in the field.
| Lines | Spike Number (per Plant) | Grain Number (per Spike) | Kernel Weight per Grain (mg) | Weight of Individual Spike (g) | Starch Content (mg/Grain) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT | 6.3 ± 0.3a | 23.0 ± 0.6a | 53.28 ± 0.33b | 1.23 ± 0.03b | 34.77 ± 0.64b |
| S7 | 7.0 ± 0.6a | 23.3 ± 0.3a | 59.02 ± 0.61a | 1.38 ± 0.01a | 39.86 ± 0.52a |
| S10 | 6.7 ± 0.3a | 23.7 ± 0.3a | 57.12 ± 1.47a | 1.35 ± 0.16a | 38.77 ± 1.09a |
Data were mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters represented statistical significance at p < 0.05.
Figure 4Comparison of phenotype of mature grains between WT and the representative transgenic wheat lines. Eighteen grains were randomly selected in WT and S7 line, respectively.