Philippe De Vloo1,2, Simon Raymaekers3, Kris van Kuyck2, Laura Luyten2,4, Lutgardis Gabriëls3, Bart Nuttin1,2. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 2. Research Group Experimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 4. Research Group Psychology of Learning and Experimental Psychopathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: From 1999 onwards, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been proposed as an alternative to capsulotomy in refractory cases of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Although rechargeable implantable pulse generators (rIPGs) have been used extensively in DBS for movement disorders, there are no reports on rIPGs in patients with a psychiatric DBS indication, and even possible objections to their use. OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate rIPGs in OCD in terms of effectiveness, applicability, safety, and need for IPG replacement. METHODS: In this prospective before-after study recruiting from 2007 until 2012, OCD patients requiring at least one IPG replacement per 18 months were proposed to have a rIPG implanted at the next IPG depletion. OCD severity was the primary outcome. Ten patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Psychiatric symptoms and global functioning remained stable in the two years after as compared to the two years before rIPG implantation. Over the same period, the prescribed OCD medication doses did not increase and the DBS stimulation parameters were largely unaltered. Until the end of the follow-up (mean 4¾ years; maximum seven years), the DBS-related surgery frequency decreased and there were no rIPG replacements. During the first few weeks after implantation, two patients obsessively checked the rIPG, but afterwards there were no signs of compulsively checking or recharging the rIPG. Two patients experienced rIPG overdischarges (five occurrences in total). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report on rIPGs in DBS for OCD patients. The use of rIPGs in this population appears to be effective, applicable, and safe and diminishes the need for IPG replacements.
BACKGROUND: From 1999 onwards, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been proposed as an alternative to capsulotomy in refractory cases of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Although rechargeable implantable pulse generators (rIPGs) have been used extensively in DBS for movement disorders, there are no reports on rIPGs in patients with a psychiatric DBS indication, and even possible objections to their use. OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate rIPGs in OCD in terms of effectiveness, applicability, safety, and need for IPG replacement. METHODS: In this prospective before-after study recruiting from 2007 until 2012, OCD patients requiring at least one IPG replacement per 18 months were proposed to have a rIPG implanted at the next IPG depletion. OCD severity was the primary outcome. Ten patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Psychiatric symptoms and global functioning remained stable in the two years after as compared to the two years before rIPG implantation. Over the same period, the prescribed OCD medication doses did not increase and the DBS stimulation parameters were largely unaltered. Until the end of the follow-up (mean 4¾ years; maximum seven years), the DBS-related surgery frequency decreased and there were no rIPG replacements. During the first few weeks after implantation, two patients obsessively checked the rIPG, but afterwards there were no signs of compulsively checking or recharging the rIPG. Two patients experienced rIPG overdischarges (five occurrences in total). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report on rIPGs in DBS for OCD patients. The use of rIPGs in this population appears to be effective, applicable, and safe and diminishes the need for IPG replacements.
Authors: Marshall T Holland; Nicholas T Trapp; Laurie M McCormick; Francis J Jareczek; Mario Zanaty; Liesl N Close; James Beeghly; Jeremy D W Greenlee Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2020-02-28 Impact factor: 4.157