Literature DB >> 28256293

Use of a home vacuum-assisted closure device in the burn population is both cost-effective and efficacious.

Oren P Mushin1, Jarrod T Bogue1, Mica D Esquenazi1, Nicole Toscano1, Derek E Bell2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The vacuum assisted closure device (VAC) improves wound-healing when utilized as a bolster to secure split thickness skin grafts (STSG). Patients typically remain hospitalized for VAC therapy; however, home VACs (hVAC) are now available. Limited studies examine burns treated with hVAC as a STSG bolster.
METHOD: A retrospective study of records from an ABA verified regional burn center was conducted over 23 months. Patients included STSGs for burn. Data points included demographics, burn mechanism and location, graft characteristics, hospital length of stay (LOS), and time to heal. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Fifty patients were included, with average age of 39 years (range <1-83years). Average burn TBSA was 1.27±1.42 (range 0.05-8.18). Grafted area average was 102.9±128.1cm2. The most commonly treated areas were the leg/foot, thigh, and torso (53%, 16%, and 16%, respectively). Average LOS was 1.1±1.2 days. Mean graft-take was 99.2±2.8% with one patient undergoing repeat STSG. Average post-operative time to heal was 16±6 days. A 5-day inpatient stay with a VAC costs an average of $34,635, compared to $9134 for an hVAC over the same period.
CONCLUSIONS: The hVAC is a cost-effective STSG bolster in the burn population for appropriate candidates. Excellent graft-take and low morbidity rates imply that this is an efficacious alternative for STSG bolster.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Home VAC; Negative pressure wound therapy; Skin graft; VAC; Vacuum assisted closure device; hVAC

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28256293     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.08.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  1 in total

1.  Inpatient Versus Outpatient Management of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Katherine B Santosa; Alexandra M Keane; Matt Keller; Margaret A Olsen; Erika D Sears; Alison K Snyder-Warwick
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 2.192

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.