Literature DB >> 28255941

Identifying Environmental and Social Factors Predisposing to Pathological Gambling Combining Standard Logistic Regression and Logic Learning Machine.

Stefano Parodi1, Corrado Dosi2, Antonella Zambon3, Enrico Ferrari4, Marco Muselli5.   

Abstract

Identifying potential risk factors for problem gambling (PG) is of primary importance for planning preventive and therapeutic interventions. We illustrate a new approach based on the combination of standard logistic regression and an innovative method of supervised data mining (Logic Learning Machine or LLM). Data were taken from a pilot cross-sectional study to identify subjects with PG behaviour, assessed by two internationally validated scales (SOGS and Lie/Bet). Information was obtained from 251 gamblers recruited in six betting establishments. Data on socio-demographic characteristics, lifestyle and cognitive-related factors, and type, place and frequency of preferred gambling were obtained by a self-administered questionnaire. The following variables associated with PG were identified: instant gratification games, alcohol abuse, cognitive distortion, illegal behaviours and having started gambling with a relative or a friend. Furthermore, the combination of LLM and LR indicated the presence of two different types of PG, namely: (a) daily gamblers, more prone to illegal behaviour, with poor money management skills and who started gambling at an early age, and (b) non-daily gamblers, characterised by superstitious beliefs and a higher preference for immediate reward games. Finally, instant gratification games were strongly associated with the number of games usually played. Studies on gamblers habitually frequently betting shops are rare. The finding of different types of PG by habitual gamblers deserves further analysis in larger studies. Advanced data mining algorithms, like LLM, are powerful tools and potentially useful in identifying risk factors for PG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Logic Learning Machine; Logistic regression; Problem gambling; ROC analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28255941     DOI: 10.1007/s10899-017-9679-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gambl Stud        ISSN: 1050-5350


  23 in total

1.  Combining several screening tests: optimality of the risk score.

Authors:  Martin W McIntosh; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Complex factors and behaviors in the gambling population of Italy.

Authors:  Luca Bastiani; Mercedes Gori; Emanuela Colasante; Valeria Siciliano; Daniela Capitanucci; Paolo Jarre; Sabrina Molinaro
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2013-03

Review 3.  Pathological gambling: a general overview.

Authors:  Larry L Ashley; Karmen K Boehlke
Journal:  J Psychoactive Drugs       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar

Review 4.  The subtyping of pathological gambling: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Aleks Milosevic; David M Ledgerwood
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-07-06

Review 5.  Risk factors for problematic gambling: a critical literature review.

Authors:  Agneta Johansson; Jon E Grant; Suck Won Kim; Brian L Odlaug; K Gunnar Götestam
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2009-03

6.  The Lie/Bet Questionnaire for screening pathological gamblers.

Authors:  E E Johnson; R Hamer; R M Nora; B Tan; N Eisenstein; C Engelhart
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1997-02

7.  Betting on Illusory Patterns: Probability Matching in Habitual Gamblers.

Authors:  Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Andreas Wilke; Benjamin Scheibehenne; Paige McCanney; H Clark Barrett
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2016-03

8.  Logic Learning Machine and standard supervised methods for Hodgkin's lymphoma prognosis using gene expression data and clinical variables.

Authors:  Stefano Parodi; Chiara Manneschi; Damiano Verda; Enrico Ferrari; Marco Muselli
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers.

Authors:  H R Lesieur; S B Blume
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Evaluating the South Oaks Gambling Screen with DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria: results from a diverse community sample of gamblers.

Authors:  Adam S Goodie; James MacKillop; Joshua D Miller; Erica E Fortune; Jessica Maples; Charles E Lance; W Keith Campbell
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2013-08-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.