Sascha Meyer1, Martin Poryo2, Sara Khosrawikatoli3, Yvonne Goda3, Michael Zemlin4. 1. Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Medical School, Saarland University Medical Center, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany. sascha.meyer@uks.eu. 2. Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Medical School, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany. 3. Medical School, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany. 4. Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Medical School, Saarland University Medical Center, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cochrane meta-analyses provide the physician at the bedside with the most relevant, up-to-date clinical information. However, implementation of evidence-based medicine (EBM) at the bedside may be difficult for a variety of reasons. The aim of this study was to assess relevant issues and obstacles related to implementing EBM in pediatrics in real life at the bedside/cotside. METHODS: We performed five systematic literature reviews of all published Cochrane reviews in neonatology (1996-2010), pediatric neurology (1996-2010), pediatric gastroenterology (1993-2012), pediatric cardiology (2001-2015), and complementary and alternative medicine (1996-2012; CAM) in children and neonates. In all five analyses, the main outcome variables were percentage of reviews concluding that a certain intervention provides a benefit, percentage of reviews concluding that a certain intervention should not be performed, and percentage of studies concluding that the current level of evidence is inconclusive. RESULTS: In all five areas of pediatrics, a substantial number of Cochrane reviews yielded inconclusive data (neonatology: 46.6%; neuropediatrics: 26.8%; pediatric gastroenterology: 27.9%; pediatric cardiology: 42.9%; complementary and alternative medicine: 66.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Our up-dated systematic synopsis reiterates the need for high-quality, sophisticated research to reduce the number of inconclusive meta-analyses in the field of pediatrics-most importantly in the field of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), neonatology, and pediatric cardiology. The realization of high-quality, clinically driven research will in turn yield more systematic reviews with a clear conclusion (e. g., in favor or against a certain intervention, or treatment modality), thus, substantively decreasing the proportion of inconclusive reviews.
BACKGROUND: Cochrane meta-analyses provide the physician at the bedside with the most relevant, up-to-date clinical information. However, implementation of evidence-based medicine (EBM) at the bedside may be difficult for a variety of reasons. The aim of this study was to assess relevant issues and obstacles related to implementing EBM in pediatrics in real life at the bedside/cotside. METHODS: We performed five systematic literature reviews of all published Cochrane reviews in neonatology (1996-2010), pediatric neurology (1996-2010), pediatric gastroenterology (1993-2012), pediatric cardiology (2001-2015), and complementary and alternative medicine (1996-2012; CAM) in children and neonates. In all five analyses, the main outcome variables were percentage of reviews concluding that a certain intervention provides a benefit, percentage of reviews concluding that a certain intervention should not be performed, and percentage of studies concluding that the current level of evidence is inconclusive. RESULTS: In all five areas of pediatrics, a substantial number of Cochrane reviews yielded inconclusive data (neonatology: 46.6%; neuropediatrics: 26.8%; pediatric gastroenterology: 27.9%; pediatric cardiology: 42.9%; complementary and alternative medicine: 66.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Our up-dated systematic synopsis reiterates the need for high-quality, sophisticated research to reduce the number of inconclusive meta-analyses in the field of pediatrics-most importantly in the field of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), neonatology, and pediatric cardiology. The realization of high-quality, clinically driven research will in turn yield more systematic reviews with a clear conclusion (e. g., in favor or against a certain intervention, or treatment modality), thus, substantively decreasing the proportion of inconclusive reviews.
Entities:
Keywords:
Complementary and alternative medicine; Evidence-based medicine; Neonatology; Neuropediatrics; Pediatric cardiology; Pediatric gastroenterology
Authors: Yvonne Goda; Harald Sauer; Dominik Schöndorf; Pia Hennes; Ludwig Gortner; Stefan Gräber; Sascha Meyer Journal: Pediatr Int Date: 2014-11-22 Impact factor: 1.524
Authors: Sascha Meyer; Ludwig Gortner; Alexander Larsen; Georg Kutschke; Sven Gottschling; Stefan Gräber; Nicole Schroeder Journal: Swiss Med Wkly Date: 2013-05-27 Impact factor: 2.193
Authors: Dean A Fergusson; Paul Hébert; Debora L Hogan; Louise LeBel; Nicole Rouvinez-Bouali; John A Smyth; Koravangattu Sankaran; Alan Tinmouth; Morris A Blajchman; Lajos Kovacs; Christian Lachance; Shoo Lee; C Robin Walker; Brian Hutton; Robin Ducharme; Katelyn Balchin; Tim Ramsay; Jason C Ford; Ashok Kakadekar; Kuppuchipalayam Ramesh; Stan Shapiro Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-10-10 Impact factor: 56.272