Literature DB >> 28255651

Evaluation of PCR methods for detection of Brucella strains from culture and tissues.

Alper Çiftci1, Tuba İça2, Serap Savaşan3, Barış Sareyyüpoğlu4, Mehmet Akan4, Kadir Serdar Diker4.   

Abstract

The genus Brucella causes significant economic losses due to infertility, abortion, stillbirth or weak calves, and neonatal mortality in livestock. Brucellosis is still a zoonosis of public health importance worldwide. The study was aimed to optimize and evaluate PCR assays used for the diagnosis of Brucella infections. For this aim, several primers and PCR protocols were performed and compared with Brucella cultures and biological material inoculated with Brucella. In PCR assays, genus- or species-specific oligonucleotide primers derived from 16S rRNA sequences (F4/R2, Ba148/928, IS711, BruP6-P7) and OMPs (JPF/JPR, 31ter/sd) of Brucella were used. All primers except for BruP6-P7 detected the DNA from reference Brucella strains and field isolates. In spiked blood, milk, and semen samples, F4-R2 primer-oriented PCR assays detected minimal numbers of Brucella. In spiked serum and fetal stomach content, Ba148/928 primer-oriented PCR assays detected minimal numbers of Brucella. Field samples collected from sheep and cattle were examined by bacteriological methods and optimized PCR assays. Overall, sensitivity of PCR assays was found superior to conventional bacteriological isolation. Brucella DNA was detected in 35.1, 1.1, 24.8, 5.0, and 8.0% of aborted fetus, blood, milk, semen, and serum samples by PCR assays, respectively. In conclusion, PCR assay in optimized conditions was found to be valuable in sensitive and specific detection of Brucella infections of animals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brucella; Cattle; Detection; PCR; Sheep

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28255651     DOI: 10.1007/s11250-017-1256-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod        ISSN: 0049-4747            Impact factor:   1.559


  24 in total

Review 1.  PCR inhibitors - occurrence, properties and removal.

Authors:  C Schrader; A Schielke; L Ellerbroek; R Johne
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.772

2.  DNA polymorphism at the omp-31 locus of Brucella spp.: evidence for a large deletion in Brucella abortus, and other species-specific markers.

Authors:  N Vizcaíno; J M Verger; M Grayon; M S Zygmunt; A Cloeckaert
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.777

3.  Epidemiology of brucellosis in domestic animals caused by Brucella melitensis, Brucella suis and Brucella abortus.

Authors:  E Díaz Aparicio
Journal:  Rev Sci Tech       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.181

4.  Detection of Brucella melitensis in semen using the polymerase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  A S Amin; M E Hamdy; A K Ibrahim
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2001-10-22       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Evaluation of different primers for detection of Brucella in human and animal serum samples by using PCR method.

Authors:  Mohsen Zamanian; Gholam Reza Hashemi Tabar; Mehrnaz Rad; Alireza Haghparast
Journal:  Arch Iran Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.354

6.  Differentiation of Brucella abortus bv. 1, 2, and 4, Brucella melitensis, Brucella ovis, and Brucella suis bv. 1 by PCR.

Authors:  B J Bricker; S M Halling
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Brucella isolated in humans and animals in Latin America from 1968 to 2006.

Authors:  N E Lucero; S M Ayala; G I Escobar; N R Jacob
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 2.451

8.  Enhancement of the Brucella AMOS PCR assay for differentiation of Brucella abortus vaccine strains S19 and RB51.

Authors:  B J Bricker; S M Halling
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Direct detection of Brucella spp. in raw milk by PCR and reverse hybridization with 16S-23S rRNA spacer probes.

Authors:  N P Rijpens; G Jannes; M Van Asbroeck; R Rossau; L M Herman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Brucellosis: review on the recent trends in pathogenicity and laboratory diagnosis.

Authors:  Supriya Christopher; B L Umapathy; K L Ravikumar
Journal:  J Lab Physicians       Date:  2010-07
View more
  3 in total

1.  High level of B19 strain detection in Brazilian cattle semen.

Authors:  M P S Lourencetti; M A Souza; M R Ganda; J P Santos; A Ferreira Júnior; S Miyashiro; A M C Lima
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-10-29       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Seroprevalence of camel brucellosis in Qatar.

Authors:  Hashim Alhussain; Susu M Zughaier; Ahmed Gawish; Mahmoud H Mahmoud; Hadi M Yassine; Asmaa Al Thani; Tahra El- Obied; Abdulaziz M Al-Zeyara; Nahla O Eltai
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 1.893

3.  Comparative efficacy of serological diagnostic methods and evaluation of polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis.

Authors:  A K Verma; A Kumar; I Ahmed
Journal:  Iran J Vet Res       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.376

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.