| Literature DB >> 28255014 |
Paul Saultier1, Léa Vidal2, Matthias Canault2, Denis Bernot2, Céline Falaise3, Catherine Pouymayou3, Jean-Claude Bordet4, Noémie Saut2,3, Agathe Rostan2,3, Véronique Baccini2,3, Franck Peiretti2, Marie Favier2, Pauline Lucca5,6,7, Jean-François Deleuze8, Robert Olaso8, Anne Boland8, Pierre Emmanuel Morange2,3, Christian Gachet9,10,11,12, Fabrice Malergue13, Sixtine Fauré2, Anita Eckly9,10,11,12, David-Alexandre Trégouët5,6,7, Marjorie Poggi2, Marie-Christine Alessi2,3.
Abstract
Congenital macrothrombocytopenia is a family of rare diseases, of which a significant fraction remains to be genetically characterized. To analyze cases of unexplained thrombocytopenia, 27 individuals from a patient cohort of the Bleeding and Thrombosis Exploration Center of the University Hospital of Marseille were recruited for a high-throughput gene sequencing study. This strategy led to the identification of two novel FLI1 variants (c.1010G>A and c.1033A>G) responsible for macrothrombocytopenia. The FLI1 variant carriers' platelets exhibited a defect in aggregation induced by low-dose adenosine diphosphate (ADP), collagen and thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP), a defect in adenosine triphosphate (ATP) secretion, a reduced mepacrine uptake and release and a reduced CD63 expression upon TRAP stimulation. Precise ultrastructural analysis of platelet content was performed using transmission electron microscopy and focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy. Remarkably, dense granules were nearly absent in the carriers' platelets, presumably due to a biogenesis defect. Additionally, 25-29% of the platelets displayed giant α-granules, while a smaller proportion displayed vacuoles (7-9%) and autophagosome-like structures (0-3%). In vitro study of megakaryocytes derived from circulating CD34+ cells of the carriers revealed a maturation defect and reduced proplatelet formation potential. The study of the FLI1 variants revealed a significant reduction in protein nuclear accumulation and transcriptional activity properties. Intraplatelet flow cytometry efficiently detected the biomarker MYH10 in FLI1 variant carriers. Overall, this study provides new insights into the phenotype, pathophysiology and diagnosis of FLI1 variant-associated thrombocytopenia. Copyright© Ferrata Storti Foundation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28255014 PMCID: PMC5451332 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2016.153577
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Haematologica ISSN: 0390-6078 Impact factor: 9.941
Figure 1.Identification of two novel FLI1 variants. (A) Pedigrees for the affected families. Squares denote males and circles denote females. Black filled symbols represent family members carrying heterozygous c.1010 G>A and c.1033 A>G FLI1 variants. Dotted line symbols represent non-tested members. Arrows indicate the probands. (B) Schematic diagram of the FLI1 protein. The functional N-terminal Pointed domain (PNT), and C-terminal ETS DNA-binding domain (ETS) are depicted. The positions of the alterations in FLI1 are indicated in red (alterations reported in this study) or black (previously reported alterations).[7,8] (C) Sequence alignment of the FLI1 protein (variant NM_002017.3). The variants reported in this study are indicated in red (top). Alignments of various members of the ETS-domain transcription factor family (middle) and different species (bottom) are provided. (D) Diagram of the simulated interactions between FLI1 and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). Left: Interaction of native FLI1 with dsDNA. The FLI1 dsDNA-interacting domain is represented as a green ribbon. The dsDNA is represented as a stick model (carbons: pink; nitrogen: blue; oxygen: red; phosphate: orange). The interactions of R337 with Guanine 5 atoms N7 and O6 as well as K345 with Adenine 15 atom OP2 (side chain carbons: yellow; nitrogen: blue; oxygen: red) are indicated in red. Right: model of FLI1 structure with mutated residues p.R337Q and p.K345E. An expanded view of the interaction between altered residues and DNA is shown at the bottom.
Platelet phenotyping in patients carrying the FLI1 variants.
Figure 2.Platelet function analysis. (A) Light transmission aggregometry upon ADP (2 μM), collagen (2 and 10 μg/ml) and TRAP-6 (10 and 50 μM) stimulation in a FLI1 variant carrier (F1-III1) and in a control who was representative of 20 controls investigated at the same period of time. The PRP platelet count was 268 ×109/l for the patient and 331 ×109/l for the control. (B) Luminometry-based ATP secretion assay. ATP secretion was measured in two FLI1 variant carriers (F1-II2 and F1-III1) and unrelated controls after 100 μM TRAP-6 stimulation in 100 μl of diluted PRP (107 platelet/ml). *P<0.05 vs. controls (Mann-Whitney test). (C) Flow cytometric mepacrine uptake and release assay in two FLI1 variant carriers (F1-II2 and F2-II4) and unrelated controls. The platelets were incubated with 1.1 or 2.4 μM mepacrine and stimulated with 40 μM TRAP-14 to evaluate the mepacrine release. The mepacrine uptake was defined as the MFI ratio of platelets incubated with mepacrine to platelets incubated without mepacrine, and the mepacrine release was defined as the MFI ratio of resting platelets to stimulated platelets. ADP: adenosine diphosphate; ATP: adenosine triphosphate; TRAP: thrombin receptor-activating peptide; Coll: collagen; MFI: mean fluorescence intensity.
Figure 3.Quantification of platelet MYH10 expression. (A) Flow cytometry-based quantitative detection of intraplatelet MYH10 expression (PRP-based assay). Left: representative overlay of histograms of intraplatelet MYH10 expression in an affected member (F1-II2) and a healthy control. The non-specific staining (irrelevant IgG) is only presented for the affected member, which can be superimposed for that of the control. Right: MYH10 mean fluorescence intensity (MYH10 MFI – irrelevant IgG MFI) in affected members (n=3) or unrelated controls (n=8) from three independent experiments. The results are expressed as fold change relative to corresponding controls; **P<0.01 vs. controls (Mann-Whitney test). (B) Left: representative western blot analysis of MYH10 expression in platelets from the affected members (F1-II2, F1-III1, F2-II4), one unaffected member (F1-II3) and two unrelated controls. GAPDH and actin were used as a protein loading control. Right: the results of densitometric analysis were normalized to actin and expressed as mean ± SEM; **P<0.01 vs. controls (Mann-Whitney test). Three independent experiments were performed. GAPDH: glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; IgG: immunoglobulin G; a.u.: arbitrary units.
Figure 4.Functional characterization of the FLI1 variants. (A) Left: representative western blot analysis of FLI1 expression in platelets from the affected members (F1-II2, F1-III1) and three control individuals. GAPDH and actin were used as a protein loading control. Right: the results of the densitometric analysis were normalized to actin and expressed as mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. (B) Left: representative western blot analysis of FLI1 expression in GripTite 293 MSR cells transfected with an empty vector, wild-type (WT) or variant FLI1 constructs using an anti-HA antibody. GAPDH was used as a protein loading control. Right: the results of the densitometric analysis are expressed as mean ± SEM. Three independent experiments were performed. (C) GripTite 293 MSR cells were co-transfected with an empty vector, WT or variant FLI1 constructs including the c.970C.T FLI1 variant previously reported by Stevenson et al.[8] (p.R324W) along with the luciferase reporter plasmid containing three tandem copies of the ETS-binding site upstream of the HSV tk promoter (E743tk80Luc) and pGL4.73 Renilla luciferase control vector. Firefly to renilla luminescence ratios (Fluc/Rluc) were calculated to compensate for transfection efficiency and expressed as fold change relative to empty vector. The data represent the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments; *P<0.05, ****P<0.0001 vs. WT (one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test). (D) Western blot analysis of WT and variant FLI1 subcellular localization. GripTite 293 MSR cells were transfected with an empty vector, WT or variant FLI1 constructs. The lamin-B1 and GAPDH expression were used as nuclear and cytoplasmic markers, respectively. The data are the mean ± SEM of four independent experiments; *P<0.05 vs. WT (Mann-Whitney test). (E) Left: representative immunofluorescence microscopy images of H9C2 cells transfected with WT or variant FLI1 constructs visualized using bright field illumination and immunofluorescence after FLI1 and DAPI staining; scale bar, 5 μm. Right: quantification of the nuclear and cytoplasmic integrated density of fluorescence. The data are expressed as mean ± SEM of the nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio of fluorescence integrated density from two independent experiments (≥ 30 total cells were assessed for each condition); ****P<0.0001 vs. WT (Mann-Whitney test). GAPDH: glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; HA: hemagglutinin; BF: bright field.
Figure 5.Megakaryocyte differentiation and proplatelet formation. Circulating CD34+ progenitors from affected members or controls were isolated and cultured in the presence of TPO and SCF to induce megakaryocytic commitment. (A) MK differentiation was monitored using flow cytometry. The density plots represent CD41 and CD42a expression in Hoechst+ cells from an affected member (F1-II2) and an unrelated control at day 11 of culture. The ellipse gates show the populations CD41−CD42a−, CD41lowCD42a− cells and mature CD41hiCD42ahi MKs. (B) Ploidy level was monitored by flow cytometry. The histograms represent frequency distribution of Hoechst levels among the CD34+-derived cells from two affected members (F1-II2 and F1-III1) and an unrelated control at day 6, 12 and 14 of culture. (C) Representative microscopic images of proplatelet (PPT) formation after 13 days of culture. An expanded view of PPT formation is shown at the bottom. PPT formation was quantified in two affected members (F1-II2 and F2-II4) and three unrelated controls at culture days 12 and 13 from three independent experiments. The PPT-forming MK are indicated with triangle markers; scale bar, 10 μm. The percentage of PPT-forming MKs was estimated by counting MKs harboring ≥ 1 cytoplasmic process with areas of constriction; ≥ 180 total cells were assessed for each individual. The results are expressed as mean ± SEM; *P<0.05 (Mann-Whitney test). MK: megakaryocyte.
Figure 6.Platelet structure defects associated with FLI1 variants. (A) Representative May-Grünwald-Giemsa stained blood smears showing enlarged platelets with giant α-granules (patient F1-III3). Scale bar, 5 μm. (B) Platelet ultrastructural analysis from FLI1 variant carriers (F1-II2 and F2-II4) and an unrelated control. Representative electron microscopy images of platelets transmission electron microscopy (TEM) ultrathin sections (top) and whole mount (middle). 3D reconstruction of platelet α- and dense granules from focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) images (bottom); Giant α-granules are indicated with triangle markers; δ: dense granule, α: alpha-granule; Scale bar, 1 μm. (C) Measurement of the α-granules diameter and number/μm2 of platelet section, platelet surface, number of dense granules and number of empty granules. Values are shown as the mean ± SEM as quantified for ≥100 randomly selected platelets for TEM and whole mount and 12 randomly selected platelets for FIB-SEM; *P<0.05, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001 vs. controls (Mann-Whitney test). (D) Representative ultrastructural image of double membrane structures resembling autophagosome (far left panel with enlarged view middle left panel; black triangle marker: α-granule; white triangle marker: mitochondrion), area of glycogen accumulation (middle right panel; black triangle marker: glycogen), and vacuoles (far right panel; black triangle marker: vacuole) in the platelet of the affected member F1-II2.
FIB-SEM analysis of platelet ultrastructure.