Literature DB >> 28254365

Macrotopographic closure promotes tissue growth and osteogenesis in vitro.

Laura Juignet1, Baptiste Charbonnier2, Virginie Dumas3, Wafa Bouleftour4, Mireille Thomas5, Coralie Laurent6, Laurence Vico7, Nathalie Douard8, David Marchat9, Luc Malaval10.   

Abstract

While the impact of substrate topographies at nano- and microscale on bone cell behavior has been particularly well documented, very few studies have analyzed the role of substrate closure at a tissular level. Moreover, these have focused on matrix deposition rather than on osteoblastic differentiation. In the present work, mouse calvaria cells were grown for 15days on hydroxyapatite (HA) ceramics textured with three different macrogrooves shapes (**100µm): 1 sine and 2 triangle waveforms. We found that macrotopography favors cell attachment, and that bone-like tissue growth and organization are promoted by a tight "closure angle" of the substrate geometry. Interestingly, while Flat HA controls showed little marker expression at the end of the culture, cells grown on macrogrooves, and in particular the most closed (triangle waveform with a 517µm spatial period) showed a fast time-course of osteoblast differentiation, reaching high levels of gene and protein expression of osteocalcin and sclerostin, a marker of osteocytes. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Many in vitro studies have been conducted on topography at nano and microscale, fewer have focused on the influence of macrotopography on osteoblasts. Ceramics with a controlled architecture were obtained throught a 3D printing process and used to assess osteoblast behavior. Biocompatible, they allowed the long-terme survival of osteoblast cells and the laying of an important bone matrix. V-shaped grooves were found to accelerates osteoblast differentiation and promote bone-like tissue deposition and maturation (osteocyte formation), proportionately to angle closure. Such macrostructures are attractive for the design of innovative implants for bone tissue engineering and in vitro models of osteogenesis.
Copyright © 2017 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioceramics; Macrotopography; Osteoblast differentiation; Substrate closure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28254365     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.02.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  3 in total

1.  Electron Microscopy for 3D Scaffolds-Cell Biointerface Characterization.

Authors:  Donata Iandolo; Fabrizio A Pennacchio; Valentina Mollo; Domenico Rossi; David Dannhauser; Bianxiao Cui; Roisin M Owens; Francesca Santoro
Journal:  Adv Biosyst       Date:  2018-10-09

Review 2.  Strategy for achieving standardized bone models.

Authors:  Mikhael Hadida; David Marchat
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Tailored Three-Dimensionally Printed Triply Periodic Calcium Phosphate Implants: A Preclinical Study for Craniofacial Bone Repair.

Authors:  Arnaud Paré; Baptiste Charbonnier; Pierre Tournier; Caroline Vignes; Joëlle Veziers; Julie Lesoeur; Boris Laure; Hélios Bertin; Gonzague De Pinieux; Grégory Cherrier; Jérome Guicheux; Olivier Gauthier; Pierre Corre; David Marchat; Pierre Weiss
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2019-11-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.