Ambarish Pandey1, Michael LaMonte2, Liviu Klein3, Colby Ayers4, Bruce M Psaty5, Charles B Eaton6, Norrina B Allen7, James A de Lemos1, Mercedes Carnethon7, Philip Greenland7, Jarett D Berry8. 1. Division of Cardiology, UTSW Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York. 3. Division of Cardiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 4. Division of Cardiology, UTSW Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Clinical Sciences, UTSW Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 5. Cardiovascular Health Research Unit, Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology, and Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 6. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island and Department of Family Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. 7. Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois. 8. Division of Cardiology, UTSW Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Clinical Sciences, UTSW Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. Electronic address: jarett.berry@utsouthwestern.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lower leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) and higher body mass index (BMI) are independently associated with risk of heart failure (HF). However, it is unclear if this relationship is consistent for both heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to quantify dose-response associations between LTPA, BMI, and the risk of different HF subtypes. METHODS: Individual-level data from 3 cohort studies (WHI [Women's Health Initiative], MESA [Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis], and CHS [Cardiovascular Health Study]) were pooled and participants were stratified into guideline-recommended categories of LTPA and BMI. Associations between LTPA, BMI, and risk of overall HF, HFpEF (ejection fraction ≥45%), and HFrEF (ejection fraction <45%) were assessed by using multivariable adjusted Cox models and restricted cubic splines. RESULTS: The study included 51,451 participants with 3,180 HF events (1,252 HFpEF, 914 HFrEF, and 1,014 unclassified HF). In the adjusted analysis, there was a dose-dependent association between higher LTPA levels, lower BMI, and overall HF risk. Among HF subtypes, LTPA in any dose range was not associated with HFrEF risk. In contrast, lower levels of LTPA (<500 MET-min/week) were not associated with HFpEF risk, and dose-dependent associations with lower HFpEF risk were observed at higher levels. Compared with no LTPA, higher than twice the guideline-recommended minimum LTPA levels (>1,000 MET-min/week) were associated with an 19% lower risk of HFpEF (hazard ratio: 0.81; 95% confidence interval: 0.68 to 0.97). The dose-response relationship for BMI with HFpEF risk was also more consistent than with HFrEF risk, such that increasing BMI above the normal range (≥25 kg/m2) was associated with a greater increase in risk of HFpEF than HFrEF. CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings show strong, dose-dependent associations between LTPA levels, BMI, and risk of overall HF. Among HF subtypes, higher LTPA levels and lower BMI were more consistently associated with lower risk of HFpEF compared with HFrEF.
BACKGROUND: Lower leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) and higher body mass index (BMI) are independently associated with risk of heart failure (HF). However, it is unclear if this relationship is consistent for both heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to quantify dose-response associations between LTPA, BMI, and the risk of different HF subtypes. METHODS: Individual-level data from 3 cohort studies (WHI [Women's Health Initiative], MESA [Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis], and CHS [Cardiovascular Health Study]) were pooled and participants were stratified into guideline-recommended categories of LTPA and BMI. Associations between LTPA, BMI, and risk of overall HF, HFpEF (ejection fraction ≥45%), and HFrEF (ejection fraction <45%) were assessed by using multivariable adjusted Cox models and restricted cubic splines. RESULTS: The study included 51,451 participants with 3,180 HF events (1,252 HFpEF, 914 HFrEF, and 1,014 unclassified HF). In the adjusted analysis, there was a dose-dependent association between higher LTPA levels, lower BMI, and overall HF risk. Among HF subtypes, LTPA in any dose range was not associated with HFrEF risk. In contrast, lower levels of LTPA (<500 MET-min/week) were not associated with HFpEF risk, and dose-dependent associations with lower HFpEF risk were observed at higher levels. Compared with no LTPA, higher than twice the guideline-recommended minimum LTPA levels (>1,000 MET-min/week) were associated with an 19% lower risk of HFpEF (hazard ratio: 0.81; 95% confidence interval: 0.68 to 0.97). The dose-response relationship for BMI with HFpEF risk was also more consistent than with HFrEF risk, such that increasing BMI above the normal range (≥25 kg/m2) was associated with a greater increase in risk of HFpEF than HFrEF. CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings show strong, dose-dependent associations between LTPA levels, BMI, and risk of overall HF. Among HF subtypes, higher LTPA levels and lower BMI were more consistently associated with lower risk of HFpEF compared with HFrEF.
Authors: Jacob Sattelmair; Jeremy Pertman; Eric L Ding; Harold W Kohl; William Haskell; I-Min Lee Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-08-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Frank P Brouwers; Rudolf A de Boer; Pim van der Harst; Adriaan A Voors; Ron T Gansevoort; Stephan J Bakker; Hans L Hillege; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Wiek H van Gilst Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: R Sacha Bhatia; Jack V Tu; Douglas S Lee; Peter C Austin; Jiming Fang; Annick Haouzi; Yanyan Gong; Peter P Liu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-07-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Brian A Irving; Christopher K Davis; David W Brock; Judy Y Weltman; Damon Swift; Eugene J Barrett; Glenn A Gaesser; Arthur Weltman Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Peter Wohlfahrt; Margaret M Redfield; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Vojtech Melenovsky; Garvan C Kane; Richard J Rodeheffer; Barry A Borlaug Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2014-09-03 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Stephan Mueller; Ephraim B Winzer; André Duvinage; Andreas B Gevaert; Frank Edelmann; Bernhard Haller; Elisabeth Pieske-Kraigher; Paul Beckers; Anna Bobenko; Jennifer Hommel; Caroline M Van de Heyning; Katrin Esefeld; Pia von Korn; Jeffrey W Christle; Mark J Haykowsky; Axel Linke; Ulrik Wisløff; Volker Adams; Burkert Pieske; Emeline M van Craenenbroeck; Martin Halle Journal: JAMA Date: 2021-02-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Kathryn Dryer; Mark Gajjar; Nikhil Narang; Margaret Lee; Jonathan Paul; Atman P Shah; Sandeep Nathan; Javed Butler; Charles J Davidson; William F Fearon; Sanjiv J Shah; John E A Blair Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2018-02-09 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Vishal N Rao; Di Zhao; Matthew A Allison; Eliseo Guallar; Kavita Sharma; Michael H Criqui; Mary Cushman; Roger S Blumenthal; Erin D Michos Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2018-10-10 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Ambarish Pandey; Kershaw V Patel; Wanpen Vongpatanasin; Colby Ayers; Jarett D Berry; Robert J Mentz; Michael J Blaha; John W McEvoy; Paul Muntner; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Adolfo Correa; Javed Butler; Daichi Shimbo; Vijay Nambi; Christopher deFilippi; Stephen L Seliger; Christie M Ballantyne; Elizabeth Selvin; James A de Lemos; Parag H Joshi Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Roberta Florido; Lucia Kwak; Mariana Lazo; Vijay Nambi; Haitham M Ahmed; Sheila M Hegde; Gary Gerstenblith; Roger S Blumenthal; Christie M Ballantyne; Elizabeth Selvin; Aaron R Folsom; Josef Coresh; Chiadi E Ndumele Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 29.690