Literature DB >> 28254075

PCA based clustering for brain tumor segmentation of T1w MRI images.

Irem Ersöz Kaya1, Ayça Çakmak Pehlivanlı2, Emine Gezmez Sekizkardeş3, Turgay Ibrikci4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Medical images are huge collections of information that are difficult to store and process consuming extensive computing time. Therefore, the reduction techniques are commonly used as a data pre-processing step to make the image data less complex so that a high-dimensional data can be identified by an appropriate low-dimensional representation. PCA is one of the most popular multivariate methods for data reduction. This paper is focused on T1-weighted MRI images clustering for brain tumor segmentation with dimension reduction by different common Principle Component Analysis (PCA) algorithms. Our primary aim is to present a comparison between different variations of PCA algorithms on MRIs for two cluster methods.
METHODS: Five most common PCA algorithms; namely the conventional PCA, Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis (PPCA), Expectation Maximization Based Principal Component Analysis (EM-PCA), Generalize Hebbian Algorithm (GHA), and Adaptive Principal Component Extraction (APEX) were applied to reduce dimensionality in advance of two clustering algorithms, K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means. In the study, the T1-weighted MRI images of the human brain with brain tumor were used for clustering. In addition to the original size of 512 lines and 512 pixels per line, three more different sizes, 256 × 256, 128 × 128 and 64 × 64, were included in the study to examine their effect on the methods.
RESULTS: The obtained results were compared in terms of both the reconstruction errors and the Euclidean distance errors among the clustered images containing the same number of principle components.
CONCLUSION: According to the findings, the PPCA obtained the best results among all others. Furthermore, the EM-PCA and the PPCA assisted K-Means algorithm to accomplish the best clustering performance in the majority as well as achieving significant results with both clustering algorithms for all size of T1w MRI images.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clustering; Dimension reduction; Fuzzy C-Means; PCA algorithms; k-means

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28254075     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed        ISSN: 0169-2607            Impact factor:   5.428


  5 in total

1.  Value of Magnetic Resonance Images and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Diagnosis of Brain Tumors under Fuzzy C-Means Algorithm.

Authors:  Huaiqin Liu; Qi Zhang; Shujun Niu; Hao Liu
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.009

2.  A Novel Deep Learning Method for Recognition and Classification of Brain Tumors from MRI Images.

Authors:  Momina Masood; Tahira Nazir; Marriam Nawaz; Awais Mehmood; Junaid Rashid; Hyuk-Yoon Kwon; Toqeer Mahmood; Amir Hussain
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-21

3.  In-depth comparative analysis of Illumina® MiSeq run metrics: Development of a wet-lab quality assessment tool.

Authors:  George John Kastanis; Luis V Santana-Quintero; Maria Sanchez-Leon; Sara Lomonaco; Eric W Brown; Marc W Allard
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 7.090

4.  Combining Radiology and Pathology for Automatic Glioma Classification.

Authors:  Xiyue Wang; Ruijie Wang; Sen Yang; Jun Zhang; Minghui Wang; Dexing Zhong; Jing Zhang; Xiao Han
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-21

5.  Use of Acoustic Emission and Pattern Recognition for Crack Detection of a Large Carbide Anvil.

Authors:  Bin Chen; Yanan Wang; Zhaoli Yan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.