Literature DB >> 28253535

Homozygous mutations in VAMP1 cause a presynaptic congenital myasthenic syndrome.

Vincenzo Salpietro1, Weichun Lin2, Andrea Delle Vedove3,4, Markus Storbeck3,4, Yun Liu2, Stephanie Efthymiou1, Andreea Manole1, Sarah Wiethoff1, Qiaohong Ye2, Anand Saggar5, Kenneth McElreavey6, Shyam S Krishnakumar7,8, Matthew Pitt9, Oscar D Bello7,8, James E Rothman7,8, Lina Basel-Vanagaite10,11,12, Monika Weisz Hubshman10,11,12, Sharon Aharoni12,13, Adnan Y Manzur14, Brunhilde Wirth3, Henry Houlden1.   

Abstract

We report 2 families with undiagnosed recessive presynaptic congenital myasthenic syndrome (CMS). Whole exome or genome sequencing identified segregating homozygous variants in VAMP1: c.51_64delAGGTGGGGGTCCCC in a Kuwaiti family and c.146G>C in an Israeli family. VAMP1 is crucial for vesicle fusion at presynaptic neuromuscular junction (NMJ). Electrodiagnostic examination showed severely low compound muscle action potentials and presynaptic impairment. We assessed the effect of the nonsense mutation on mRNA levels and evaluated the NMJ transmission in VAMP1lew/lew mice, observing neurophysiological features of presynaptic impairment, similar to the patients. Taken together, our findings highlight VAMP1 homozygous mutations as a cause of presynaptic CMS. Ann Neurol 2017;81:597-603.
© 2017 The Authors. Annals of Neurology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28253535      PMCID: PMC5413866          DOI: 10.1002/ana.24905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


The congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMSs) are a heterogeneous group of inherited diseases of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), with fatigable muscle weakness as the clinical hallmark.1 Several molecular causes can be implicated in CMS pathophysiology, including mutations in genes encoding proteins associated with the muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and the synaptic basal lamina, or (more rarely) involved in the NMJ presynaptic transmission.2, 3, 4, 5, 6 We describe 2 families from Kuwait and Israel where 2 of the siblings in each family presented clinical and neurophysiological features typical of a presynaptic CMS. Whole exome sequencing (WES) or whole genome sequencing (WGS) followed by Sanger sequencing unraveled either a homozygous frameshift or missense variants in VAMP1 segregating with the phenotype in the 2 families. Screening a cohort of 63 undiagnosed CMS individuals failed to show any further causative variant in VAMP1.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

This study was approved by the institutional review boards of the participating centers. Informed consent was obtained from the families. Clinical details were obtained from medical records. Neurophysiological studies were performed according to standard procedures.7, 8

Genetic Studies

Before WES, the Kuwaiti probands (Family 1) underwent extensive molecular investigations that included sequencing of AGRN, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequencing, and deletion/duplication analysis and array comparative genome hybridization, which were all negative. Clinical trio‐based WES of Family 1 and WGS of the Israeli probands and their parents (Family 2) were performed as previously described.9, 10 Immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines were used for RNA extraction, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) analysis, and semiquantitative RT‐PCR assay. Sanger sequencing was performed to analyze segregation of the variants identified by WES/WGS.

Vamp1 Mice

Breeder pairs of Vamp1 mice (C3H/HeDiSnJ‐Vamp1 lew/GrsrJ, stock # 004626) were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and mated to generate homozygous mutant (Vamp1 ) mice. Electrophysiological and morphological analyses of the NMJ in the Vamp1 mice were performed as previously reported.11, 12 All experimental protocols were approved by the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center institutional animal care and use committee.

Results

Clinical and Neurophysiological Characteristics

Family 1

Both affected individuals A.II‐1 and A.II‐3 (Fig 1A) presented shortly after birth with hypotonia and muscular weakness. Feeding difficulties requiring gavage feeding, delayed motor development, and ophthalmoparesis characterized the disease course. A.II‐3 also presented joint contractures. Creatine kinase and plasma lactate were normal in the 2 children. On initial evaluation of Patient A.II‐3, muscle biopsy showed myopathic features and borderline low complex IV activity (0.011; normal range = 0.014–0.034), but congenital myopathy gene panel and mtDNA analysis were negative. Although hypotonia slightly improved in Patient A.II‐1, at the age of 3 years she still had difficulties standing upright and was unable to walk without support. Electrodiagnostic examination (EDX) in the 2 individuals showed similar findings (Table), with marked reduction in the amplitude of the compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) and an increase in the amplitude to >200% of baseline on repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) to 20Hz, indicating presynaptic impairment of NMJ transmission. The children's weakness slightly ameliorated under pyridostigmine treatment.
Figure 1

Family trees, Sanger sequencing, and VAMP1 mutation analysis. (A) Pedigree from Family 1. (B) Pedigree from Family 2. (C) Electropherograms of carrier parents and index case with the c.51_64delAGGTGGGGGTCCCC variant. (D) Electropherograms of carrier parents and the 2 patients with the c.146G>C variant. (E) Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplifying the mutant cDNA transcript from mRNA extracted from the immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines of the index case, her father, and her healthy sister (both carriers of the heterozygous deletion), and a wild‐type control (CTRL). (F) Analysis of the semiquantitative PCR using the densitometry software ImageJ after normalization relative to a housekeeping gene (GAPDH) and calculation using a relative relationship method. (G) Multiple‐sequence alignment showing complete conservation of protein sequence across species and SNARE homolog VAMP2 in the v‐SNARE coiled coil homology, in which the disease‐segregating mutation p.Arg49Pro was found. (H) VAMP1 protein representative. The c.51_64delAGGTGGGGGTCCCC deletion causes a nonsense mutation, putatively producing a truncated protein lacking the v‐SNARE and the transmembrane (TM) domains, whereas the p.Arg49Pro mutation affects an active site of the conserved v‐SNARE domain.

Family trees, Sanger sequencing, and VAMP1 mutation analysis. (A) Pedigree from Family 1. (B) Pedigree from Family 2. (C) Electropherograms of carrier parents and index case with the c.51_64delAGGTGGGGGTCCCC variant. (D) Electropherograms of carrier parents and the 2 patients with the c.146G>C variant. (E) Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplifying the mutant cDNA transcript from mRNA extracted from the immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines of the index case, her father, and her healthy sister (both carriers of the heterozygous deletion), and a wild‐type control (CTRL). (F) Analysis of the semiquantitative PCR using the densitometry software ImageJ after normalization relative to a housekeeping gene (GAPDH) and calculation using a relative relationship method. (G) Multiple‐sequence alignment showing complete conservation of protein sequence across species and SNARE homolog VAMP2 in the v‐SNARE coiled coil homology, in which the disease‐segregating mutation p.Arg49Pro was found. (H) VAMP1 protein representative. The c.51_64delAGGTGGGGGTCCCC deletion causes a nonsense mutation, putatively producing a truncated protein lacking the v‐SNARE and the transmembrane (TM) domains, whereas the p.Arg49Pro mutation affects an active site of the conserved v‐SNARE domain. Clinical and Neurophysiological Features of VAMP1‐Associated Congenital Myasthenic Syndrome in Our Families ACL = accessorius motor left; AH = abductor pollicis; CMAP = compound muscle action potential; DFM = decreased fetal movements; EDC = extensor digitorum communis; EMG = electromyogram; GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease; GI = gastrointestinal; MCD = mean consecutive difference; NA = not available; NT = not tested; Orb oculi = orbicularis oculi.

Family 2

The affected individuals of this family (B.II‐2 and B.II‐3; see Fig 1B) showed severe hypotonia and muscle weakness since birth. Both siblings had feeding difficulties and required percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. They presented severe impairment of developmental milestones. B.II‐1 also showed joint laxity and kyphoscoliosis. B.II‐3 presented knee contractures and breathing difficulties. During disease course, both children showed markedly reduced ability to generate antigravity posture and movements. B.II‐2 never reached autonomous walk; his EDX showed severely low CMAPs and increased neuromuscular jitter, indicating NMJ transmission abnormalities (see Table 1). In both siblings, pyridostigmine treatment improved symptoms.
Table 1

Clinical and Neurophysiological Features of VAMP1‐Associated Congenital Myasthenic Syndrome in Our Families

FeatureA.II‐1A.II‐3B.II‐1B.II‐2
Parental consanguinity++++
OnsetBirthBirthAntenatal, DFMBirth
Muscle weakness++++++++
Developmental delay++++++++
Feeding difficulties++++++++
Ophthalmological abnormalitiesStrabismus, mild ophthalmoplegiaMild ophthalmoplegiaStrabismusStrabismus
GI abnormalitiesGERDDysphagiaDysphagia
Skeletal joint abnormalitiesJoint contracturesJoint laxity, kyphoscoliosisJoint contractures
Chest infections, aspiration++++
Response to pyridostigmine++++
Sensory studiesNormalNormalNormalNT
Motor studiesAH CMAP ↓↓AH CMAP ↓↓ACL CMAP ↓↓NT
EMGMyopathicMyopathicMyopathicNT
Repetitive stimulationAH: 3Hz, + 32.8%; 20Hz, + 640%AH: 3Hz, + 60%; 20Hz, + 207%NANT
JitterEDC, no twitchOrb oculi, no twitch↑↑ mean MCD = 74.3 µsNT

ACL = accessorius motor left; AH = abductor pollicis; CMAP = compound muscle action potential; DFM = decreased fetal movements; EDC = extensor digitorum communis; EMG = electromyogram; GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease; GI = gastrointestinal; MCD = mean consecutive difference; NA = not available; NT = not tested; Orb oculi = orbicularis oculi.

Identification of the VAMP1 Mutation

Trio‐based WES of Family 1 (A.I‐1, A.I‐2, A.II‐1; see Fig 1A) indicated in the index case 3 genes (Supplementary Table 1) carrying homozygous exonic variants predicted to have a possible pathogenic effect on protein function, based on the guidelines for variant classification.13 Full Sanger‐based segregation analysis of the candidate variants reduced the gene list to only 1 mutation in VAMP1 (NM_014231: c.51_64delAGGTGGGGGTCCCC; p.Gly18TrpfsTer5*), which was found to be homozygous in the affected individuals and heterozygous in their healthy sister and in the unaffected parents (see Fig 1C; data shown for the index case and her parents). WGS of the 4 members of Family 2 (B.I‐2, B.I‐3, B.II‐2, B.II‐3; see Fig 1B) identified 6 genes carrying rare (likely) damaging variants (Supplementary Table 2), which were homozygous in the affected individuals and heterozygous in the parents.12 Among these 6 variants, a homozygous missense mutation in VAMP1 (NM_014231: c.146G>C; p.Arg49Pro; see Fig 1D) emerged as the most likely explanation for the disease pathogenesis, as supported by protein function (the mutation affects a conserved amino acid within the active domain of the protein),14, 15 expression and role of this gene in the NMJ,12, 16 and the homozygous mutation identified in the patients from Family 1 presenting the same phenotype (see Fig 1C–G). RT‐PCR assay (performed to analyze possible nonsense‐mediated decay associated with the VAMP1 truncating variant in Family 1) found a mild reduction of mutant cDNA expression in the index case compared to the heterozygous carriers and the wild‐type control (see Fig 1E, F).

Impairments of the Neuromuscular Junction in Vamp1 Mice

To further investigate whether a biallelic null mutation in VAMP1 in animal models may cause presynaptic NMJ abnormalities similarly to affected individuals, we re‐examined Vamp1 mutant mice that were previously described.11, 12 The endplates were localized along the central regions of the muscle in both control and Vamp1 mice (Fig 2). Individual neuromuscular synapses were found markedly smaller in Vamp1 mice compared with control, and a severe reduction in endplate potentials (EPPs) was also observed in the mutant mice. Importantly, a low‐frequency, repetitive stimulation (10Hz) led to a run‐down of EPPs in control mice, but synaptic facilitation in Vamp1 mice, indicating presynaptic defects.
Figure 2

Synaptic defects at the neuromuscular junctions in Vamp1 mice. (A, B) Low‐power images of the whole‐mount diaphragm muscles (P14) labeled by Texas Red—conjugated α‐bungarotoxin. The endplate band (arrow) is similarly localized along the central regions of the muscle in both control (A) and Vamp1 mice (B). (C–H) High‐power confocal images of individual neuromuscular synapses in triangularis sterni muscles, labeled by Texas Red–conjugated α‐bungarotoxin (arrowheads in C and F) and antineurofilament NF150 and antisynaptotagmin2 antibodies (arrowheads in D and G point to the nerve terminals). Merged images are shown in E and H, for control and Vamp1 mice, respectively. (I, J) Individual neuromuscular synapses (arrows) in triangularis sterni muscles labeled by antisyntaxin1 antibodies. The synapses are markedly smaller in Vamp1 mice compared with the control. Asterisks indicate nerve bundles. (K) An example of endplate potentials (EPPs) recorded in the diaphragm muscle in control and Vamp1 mice. (L) EPP traces responding to a low‐frequency, repetitive nerve stimulation (10Hz). (M) Quantitative measurement of the ratios of EPP amplitudes: EPP(n) to the first EPP amplitude, (EPP1). A low‐frequency, repetitive stimulation (10Hz) led to a run‐down of EPPs in control, but synaptic facilitation in (Vamp1 ) mice.

Synaptic defects at the neuromuscular junctions in Vamp1 mice. (A, B) Low‐power images of the whole‐mount diaphragm muscles (P14) labeled by Texas Red—conjugated α‐bungarotoxin. The endplate band (arrow) is similarly localized along the central regions of the muscle in both control (A) and Vamp1 mice (B). (C–H) High‐power confocal images of individual neuromuscular synapses in triangularis sterni muscles, labeled by Texas Red–conjugated α‐bungarotoxin (arrowheads in C and F) and antineurofilament NF150 and antisynaptotagmin2 antibodies (arrowheads in D and G point to the nerve terminals). Merged images are shown in E and H, for control and Vamp1 mice, respectively. (I, J) Individual neuromuscular synapses (arrows) in triangularis sterni muscles labeled by antisyntaxin1 antibodies. The synapses are markedly smaller in Vamp1 mice compared with the control. Asterisks indicate nerve bundles. (K) An example of endplate potentials (EPPs) recorded in the diaphragm muscle in control and Vamp1 mice. (L) EPP traces responding to a low‐frequency, repetitive nerve stimulation (10Hz). (M) Quantitative measurement of the ratios of EPP amplitudes: EPP(n) to the first EPP amplitude, (EPP1). A low‐frequency, repetitive stimulation (10Hz) led to a run‐down of EPPs in control, but synaptic facilitation in (Vamp1 ) mice.

Discussion

Here, we report 4 children from 2 consanguineous families who presented with typical clinical and neurophysiological features of presynaptic CMS associated with homozygous mutations in VAMP1. The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the synaptobrevin family.14 Synaptobrevins (eg, Vamp1, Vamp2), syntaxins, and the synaptosomal‐associated protein Snap25 represent the main components of the SNARE (soluble N ‐ethylmaleimide‐sensitive factor attachment protein receptors) complex, which is involved in docking and fusion of synaptic vesicles with the presynaptic membrane at the central and the neuromuscular synapses.15, 16 Proteins belonging to this complex are involved in vesicle docking through the evolutionarily conserved active v‐SNARE coiled coil homology domain and present high sequence similarity across the different SNAREs.17, 18, 19 Notably, the c.51_64delAGGTGGGGGTCCCC frameshift deletion identified in Family 1 leads to a change in the gene reading frame with the generation of a premature stop codon 5 amino acids downstream (see Fig 1H). The result is a putative VAMP1 product of only 21 amino acids, with a resulting function that is highly likely to be disrupted due to the absence of the downstream v‐SNARE domain (amino acids 33–93). The homozygous mutation identified in Family 2 consists of a substitution of a highly conserved arginine (Gerp++ score = 5.77) by a proline within the v‐SNARE domain. The mutated arginine residue in position 49 corresponds to the arginine in position 47 of the better‐studied SNARE homolog VAMP2, encoding another synaptobrevin with similar functions to VAMP1.20 Interestingly, it has been shown that disruption of this specific site in VAMP2 interferes with SNARE complex assembly, impairing neurotransmission, likely due to lack of association with other proteins involved in vesicle fusion.21, 22, 23 The Arg49Pro mutation is predicted as deleterious by SIFT, PolyPhen, and Mutation Taster and is carried in the heterozygous state by only 1 individual in the ExAC database (http://exac.broadinstitute.org, last accessed January 2017). Of note, in the ExAC database of 60,706 individuals there are only 17 individuals with heterozygous nonsynonymous single nucleotide substitutions within the v‐SNARE domain and 4 individuals in total carrying heterozygous truncating variants in VAMP1. None of these variants is present as homozygous, providing supportive evidence of pathogenicity for biallelic VAMP1 variants, either resulting in changes of the gene reading frame or affecting conserved active sites crucial to v‐SNARE domain function. Interestingly, we also showed that the electrodiagnostic anomalies recorded in VAMP1‐associated CMS are consistent with the abnormal features of presynaptic transmission we recorded in the VAMP1 null mutant mice (including the incremental response to RNS; see Fig 2). These animals, of a model called lethal wasting (carrying a homozygous mutation that causes the truncation of half of the protein), lack movement because of an impaired NMJ transmission and die within 3 weeks of birth.11, 12 To date, biallelic variants in VAMP1 have never been reported, but heterozygous mutations in this gene have been described by a single study in association with a phenotype of autosomal dominant spastic ataxia.23 However, we have not observed any neurological phenotype in the heterozygous carriers from the 2 families. In conclusion, the identification of biallelic variants in VAMP1 as a novel cause of CMS, in addition to other genes (eg, SNAP25B, SYT2) previously associated with similar presynaptic abnormalities of neuromuscular transmission,5, 6 highlights the crucial role of different SNAREs in NMJ physiology. Intriguingly, the relatively mild phenotype showed by our patients compared to the mouse model, which dies prematurely, suggests the possible existence of species‐specific compensation of vesicle fusion and release at the nerve terminal, perhaps through genetic modifiers in humans but not in mice or fruit flies. This highlights a promising area of future research aimed at the pathways involved in physiological presynaptic vesicle exocytosis at the motor endplate.

Author Contributions

Study concept and design: W.L., J.E.R., B.W., H.H. Data acquisition and analysis: A.M., A.S., K.M., L.B.‐V., M.W.H., S.A., M.P., S.E., S.W., A.Y.M., M.S., O.B., S.S.K. Drafting the manuscript and figures: V.S., A.D.V., Y.L., Q.Y.

Potential Conflicts of Interest

Nothing to report. Additional supporting information can be found in the online version of this article. Supporting Information 1 Click here for additional data file.
  23 in total

1.  Crystal structure of a SNARE complex involved in synaptic exocytosis at 2.4 A resolution.

Authors:  R B Sutton; D Fasshauer; R Jahn; A T Brunger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-09-24       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Effect of mutations in vesicle-associated membrane protein (VAMP) on the assembly of multimeric protein complexes.

Authors:  J C Hao; N Salem; X R Peng; R B Kelly; M K Bennett
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Re-examining how complexin inhibits neurotransmitter release.

Authors:  Thorsten Trimbuch; Junjie Xu; David Flaherty; Diana R Tomchick; Josep Rizo; Christian Rosenmund
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  The principle of membrane fusion in the cell (Nobel lecture).

Authors:  James Edward Rothman
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 5.  SNARE complex in developmental psychiatry: neurotransmitter exocytosis and beyond.

Authors:  Renata Basso Cupertino; Djenifer B Kappel; Cibele Edom Bandeira; Jaqueline Bohrer Schuch; Bruna Santos da Silva; Diana Müller; Claiton Henrique Dotto Bau; Nina Roth Mota
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Congenital myasthenic syndrome in Israel: Genetic and clinical characterization.

Authors:  Sharon Aharoni; Menachem Sadeh; Yehuda Shapira; Simon Edvardson; Muhannad Daana; Talia Dor-Wollman; Aviva Mimouni-Bloch; Ayelet Halevy; Rony Cohen; Liora Sagie; Zohar Argov; Malcolm Rabie; Ronen Spiegel; Ilana Chervinsky; Naama Orenstein; Andrew G Engel; Yoram Nevo
Journal:  Neuromuscul Disord       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 4.296

Review 7.  Neurophysiological strategies for the diagnosis of disorders of the neuromuscular junction in children.

Authors:  Matthew Pitt
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 5.449

Review 8.  Congenital myasthenic syndromes: recent advances.

Authors:  David Beeson
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.710

9.  De Novo Mutations in PDE10A Cause Childhood-Onset Chorea with Bilateral Striatal Lesions.

Authors:  Niccolò E Mencacci; Erik-Jan Kamsteeg; Kosuke Nakashima; Lea R'Bibo; David S Lynch; Bettina Balint; Michèl A A P Willemsen; Matthew E Adams; Sarah Wiethoff; Kazunori Suzuki; Ceri H Davies; Joanne Ng; Esther Meyer; Liana Veneziano; Paola Giunti; Deborah Hughes; F Lucy Raymond; Miryam Carecchio; Giovanna Zorzi; Nardo Nardocci; Chiara Barzaghi; Barbara Garavaglia; Vincenzo Salpietro; John Hardy; Alan M Pittman; Henry Houlden; Manju A Kurian; Haruhide Kimura; Lisenka E L M Vissers; Nicholas W Wood; Kailash P Bhatia
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Variants in SLC18A3, vesicular acetylcholine transporter, cause congenital myasthenic syndrome.

Authors:  Gina L O'Grady; Corien Verschuuren; Michaela Yuen; Richard Webster; Manoj Menezes; Johanna M Fock; Natalie Pride; Heather A Best; Tatiana Benavides Damm; Christian Turner; Monkol Lek; Andrew G Engel; Kathryn N North; Nigel F Clarke; Daniel G MacArthur; Erik-Jan Kamsteeg; Sandra T Cooper
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  17 in total

1.  Mutations in GFPT1-related congenital myasthenic syndromes are associated with synaptic morphological defects and underlie a tubular aggregate myopathy with synaptopathy.

Authors:  Stéphanie Bauché; Geoffroy Vellieux; Damien Sternberg; Marie-Joséphine Fontenille; Elodie De Bruyckere; Claire-Sophie Davoine; Guy Brochier; Julien Messéant; Lucie Wolf; Michel Fardeau; Emmanuelle Lacène; Norma Romero; Jeanine Koenig; Emmanuel Fournier; Daniel Hantaï; Nathalie Streichenberger; Veronique Manel; Arnaud Lacour; Aleksandra Nadaj-Pakleza; Sylvie Sukno; Françoise Bouhour; Pascal Laforêt; Bertrand Fontaine; Laure Strochlic; Bruno Eymard; Frédéric Chevessier; Tanya Stojkovic; Sophie Nicole
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  How to Spot Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes Resembling the Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome? A Brief Review of Clinical, Electrophysiological, and Genetics Features.

Authors:  Paulo José Lorenzoni; Rosana Herminia Scola; Claudia Suemi Kamoi Kay; Lineu Cesar Werneck; Rita Horvath; Hanns Lochmüller
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 3.  Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes in 2018.

Authors:  Andrew G Engel
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 4.  Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes or Inherited Disorders of Neuromuscular Transmission: Recent Discoveries and Open Questions.

Authors:  Sophie Nicole; Yoshiteru Azuma; Stéphanie Bauché; Bruno Eymard; Hanns Lochmüller; Clarke Slater
Journal:  J Neuromuscul Dis       Date:  2017

5.  Congenital myasthenic syndrome: phenotypic variability in patients harbouring p.T159P mutation in CHRNE gene.

Authors:  Anna Ardissone; Isabella Moroni; Pia Bernasconi; Raffaella Brugnoni
Journal:  Acta Myol       Date:  2017-03

6.  Targeted therapies for congenital myasthenic syndromes: systematic review and steps towards a treatabolome.

Authors:  Rachel Thompson; Gisèle Bonne; Paolo Missier; Hanns Lochmüller
Journal:  Emerg Top Life Sci       Date:  2019-01-28

7.  Biallelic loss of function variants in SYT2 cause a treatable congenital onset presynaptic myasthenic syndrome.

Authors:  Sandra Donkervoort; Payam Mohassel; Lucia Laugwitz; Maha S Zaki; Erik-Jan Kamsteeg; Reza Maroofian; Katherine R Chao; Corien C Verschuuren-Bemelmans; Veronka Horber; Annemarie J M Fock; Riley M McCarty; Minal S Jain; Victoria Biancavilla; Grace McMacken; Matthew Nalls; Nicol C Voermans; Hasnaa M Elbendary; Molly Snyder; Chunyu Cai; Tanya J Lehky; Valentina Stanley; Susan T Iannaccone; A Reghan Foley; Hanns Lochmüller; Joseph Gleeson; Henry Houlden; Tobias B Haack; Rita Horvath; Carsten G Bönnemann
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 2.578

8.  A homozygous loss-of-function mutation in PDE2A associated to early-onset hereditary chorea.

Authors:  Vincenzo Salpietro; Belen Perez-Dueñas; Kosuke Nakashima; Victoria San Antonio-Arce; Andreea Manole; Stephanie Efthymiou; Jana Vandrovcova; Conceicao Bettencourt; Niccolò E Mencacci; Christine Klein; Michy P Kelly; Ceri H Davies; Haruhide Kimura; Alfons Macaya; Henry Houlden
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 10.338

Review 9.  Animal Models of the Neuromuscular Junction, Vitally Informative for Understanding Function and the Molecular Mechanisms of Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes.

Authors:  Richard G Webster
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  The Neuromuscular Junction and Wide Heterogeneity of Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes.

Authors:  Pedro M Rodríguez Cruz; Jacqueline Palace; David Beeson
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.