Riccardo Gobbi1, Simone Baiardi2, Susanna Mondini3, Luca Cerritelli1, Ottavio Piccin1, Giuseppe Scaramuzzino4, Francesca Milano4, Maria Rita Melotti5, Francesco Mordini5, Antonio Pirodda1, Fabio Cirignotta2, Giovanni Sorrenti1. 1. Department of Head, Neck and Sensory System, Otorhinolaryngolologic Clinic, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. 2. Neurology Unit, Department of Head, Neck and Sensory System, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy3Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. 3. Neurology Unit, Department of Head, Neck and Sensory System, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. 4. private practice, Bologna, Italy. 5. Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Department of Surgical and Anesthesiological Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Abstract
Importance: Drug-induced sleep endoscopy is a diagnostic technique that allows dynamic evaluation of the upper airway during artificial sleep. The lack of a standardized procedure and the difficulties associated with direct visual detection of obstructive events result in poor intraobserver and interobserver reliability, especially when otolaryngology surgeons not experienced in the technique are involved. Objectives: To describe a drug-induced sleep endoscopy technique implemented with simultaneous polygraphic monitoring of cardiorespiratory parameters (DISE-PG) in patients with a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and discuss the technique's possible advantages compared with the standard procedure. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study included 50 consecutive patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome who underwent DISE-PG from March 1, 2013, to June 30, 2014. A standard protocol was adopted, and all the procedures were carried out in an operation room by an experienced otolaryngology surgeon under the supervision of an anesthesiologist. Endoscopic and polygraphic obstructive respiratory events were analyzed offline in a double-blind setting and randomized order. Main Outcomes and Measures: The feasibility and safety of the DISE-PG technique, as well as its sensitivity in detecting respiratory events compared with that of the standard drug-induced sleep endoscopy procedure. Results: All 50 patients (43 men and 7 women; mean [SD] age, 51.1 [12.1] years) underwent DISE-PG without technical problems or patient difficulties regarding the procedure. As expected, polygraphic scoring was more sensitive than endoscopic scoring in identifying obstructive events (mean [SD] total events, 13.3 [6.8] vs 5.3 [3.6]; mean [SD] difference, 8.8 [5.6]; 95% CI, 7.3 to 10.4; Cohen d, -1.5). This difference was most pronounced in patients with a higher apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) at baseline (mean [SD] difference for AHI >30, 27.1% [31.0%]; 95% CI, -36.2% to 90.4%; Cohen d, 0.2; for AH I >40, 76.0% [35.5%]; 95% CI, 4.6% to 147.4%; Cohen d, 0.5; for AHI >50, 92.2% [37.2%]; 95% CI, 17.3% to 167.1%; Cohen d, 0.6) and a high percentage of hypopneas (≥75% of all obstructive events) at baseline (mean [SD] difference, 20.2% [5.4%]; 95% CI, 9.2% to 31.3%; Cohen d, 1.1). No other anthropomorphic or polygraphic features at baseline were associated with the differences between the DISE-PG and baseline home sleep apnea test. Conclusions and Relevance: The DISE-PG technique is feasible, safe, and more sensitive at detecting an obstructed breathing pattern than is drug-induced sleep endoscopy alone. The DISE-PG technique could be helpful for accurate comprehension of upper airway obstructive dynamics (ie, degree of obstruction and multilevel pattern) and a nonobstructive breathing pattern (ie, central apneas).
Importance: Drug-induced sleep endoscopy is a diagnostic technique that allows dynamic evaluation of the upper airway during artificial sleep. The lack of a standardized procedure and the difficulties associated with direct visual detection of obstructive events result in poor intraobserver and interobserver reliability, especially when otolaryngology surgeons not experienced in the technique are involved. Objectives: To describe a drug-induced sleep endoscopy technique implemented with simultaneous polygraphic monitoring of cardiorespiratory parameters (DISE-PG) in patients with a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and discuss the technique's possible advantages compared with the standard procedure. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study included 50 consecutive patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome who underwent DISE-PG from March 1, 2013, to June 30, 2014. A standard protocol was adopted, and all the procedures were carried out in an operation room by an experienced otolaryngology surgeon under the supervision of an anesthesiologist. Endoscopic and polygraphic obstructive respiratory events were analyzed offline in a double-blind setting and randomized order. Main Outcomes and Measures: The feasibility and safety of the DISE-PG technique, as well as its sensitivity in detecting respiratory events compared with that of the standard drug-induced sleep endoscopy procedure. Results: All 50 patients (43 men and 7 women; mean [SD] age, 51.1 [12.1] years) underwent DISE-PG without technical problems or patient difficulties regarding the procedure. As expected, polygraphic scoring was more sensitive than endoscopic scoring in identifying obstructive events (mean [SD] total events, 13.3 [6.8] vs 5.3 [3.6]; mean [SD] difference, 8.8 [5.6]; 95% CI, 7.3 to 10.4; Cohen d, -1.5). This difference was most pronounced in patients with a higher apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) at baseline (mean [SD] difference for AHI >30, 27.1% [31.0%]; 95% CI, -36.2% to 90.4%; Cohen d, 0.2; for AH I >40, 76.0% [35.5%]; 95% CI, 4.6% to 147.4%; Cohen d, 0.5; for AHI >50, 92.2% [37.2%]; 95% CI, 17.3% to 167.1%; Cohen d, 0.6) and a high percentage of hypopneas (≥75% of all obstructive events) at baseline (mean [SD] difference, 20.2% [5.4%]; 95% CI, 9.2% to 31.3%; Cohen d, 1.1). No other anthropomorphic or polygraphic features at baseline were associated with the differences between the DISE-PG and baseline home sleep apnea test. Conclusions and Relevance: The DISE-PG technique is feasible, safe, and more sensitive at detecting an obstructed breathing pattern than is drug-induced sleep endoscopy alone. The DISE-PG technique could be helpful for accurate comprehension of upper airway obstructive dynamics (ie, degree of obstruction and multilevel pattern) and a nonobstructive breathing pattern (ie, central apneas).
Authors: Eric J Kezirian; David P White; Atul Malhotra; Wendy Ma; Charles E McCulloch; Andrew N Goldberg Journal: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2010-04
Authors: Lawrence J Epstein; David Kristo; Patrick J Strollo; Norman Friedman; Atul Malhotra; Susheel P Patil; Kannan Ramar; Robert Rogers; Richard J Schwab; Edward M Weaver; Michael D Weinstein Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2009-06-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Krista Rodriguez-Bruno; Andrew N Goldberg; Charles E McCulloch; Eric J Kezirian Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Nancy A Collop; W McDowell Anderson; Brian Boehlecke; David Claman; Rochelle Goldberg; Daniel J Gottlieb; David Hudgel; Michael Sateia; Richard Schwab Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Giovanni Cammaroto; Giulia Bianchi; Henry Zhang; Vik Veer; Bhik Kotecha; Ofer Jacobowitz; Marina Carrasco Llatas; Paula Martínez Ruiz de Apodaca; Rodolfo Lugo; Giuseppe Meccariello; Giannicola Iannella; Riccardo Gobbi; Song Tar Toh; Ying-Shuo Hsu; Ahmed Yassin Baghat; Jerome R Lechien; Christian Calvo-Henriquez; Carlos Chiesa-Estomba; Maria Rosaria Barillari; Badr Ibrahim; Tareck Ayad; Nicolas Fakhry; Paul Hoff; Eric Rodrigues Thuler; Lyndon Chan; Chloe Kastoer; Madeline Ravesloot; Andrea De Vito; Filippo Montevecchi; Claudio Vicini Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Michele Arigliani; Domenico M Toraldo; Filippo Montevecchi; Luana Conte; Lorenzo Galasso; Filippo De Rosa; Caterina Lattante; Enrico Ciavolino; Caterina Arigliani; Antonio Palumbo; Michele De Benedetto; Claudio Vicini Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 3.390