Literature DB >> 28253341

Correction: What Is a "Community Perception" of REDD+? A Systematic Review of How Perceptions of REDD+ Have Been Elicited and Reported in the Literature.

Stibniati S Atmadja, Erin O Sills.   

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155636.].

Year:  2017        PMID: 28253341      PMCID: PMC5333902          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


There are errors in the Funding section. The correct funding information is as follows: This research is part of the CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry and the Global Comparative Study on REDD+, with funding support from the USAID (grant number MTO069018, http://www.usaid.gov/), the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) (grant number QZA 12/0882 and QZA-16/0110 No. 1500551, http://www.norad.no/), the International Climate Initiative (IKI) of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) (grant number KI II 7–42206-6/75, https://www.international-climate-initiative.com), and the CGIAR. The above mentioned funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
  1 in total

1.  What Is a "Community Perception" of REDD+? A Systematic Review of How Perceptions of REDD+ Have Been Elicited and Reported in the Literature.

Authors:  Stibniati S Atmadja; Erin O Sills
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.