| Literature DB >> 28252675 |
J Mucumbitsi1, B Bulwer2, L Mutesa3, V Ndahindwa4, M Semakula5, E Rusingiza6, P Arya7, S Breakey8, C Patton-Bolman9, E L Kaplan10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rheumatic fever (RF) and rheumatic valvular heart disease (RHD) remain important medical, surgical and public health concerns in many parts of the world, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. However, there are no published data from Rwanda. We performed a RHD prevalence study in a randomly selected sample of Rwandan school children using the 2012 World Heart Federation (WHF) criteria.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28252675 PMCID: PMC5730679 DOI: 10.5830/CVJA-2017-007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc J Afr ISSN: 1015-9657 Impact factor: 1.167
Fig. 1.Summary of methodology and echocardiographic screening outcomes of the representative sample of Rwandan school children in the Gazabo district of the Rwandan capital, Kigali, and cases assessed as definite or borderline rheumatic heart disease (RHD) using the WHF 2012 criteria.9
World Heart Federation 2012 criteria for echocardiographic diagnosis of rheumatic heart disease as applied to this study (modified from reference 10).
| Definite RHD (either A, B, C or D): | |
| A) Pathological MR and at least two morphological features of RHD of the MV | |
| B) MS mean gradient ≥ to 4 mmHg (NB – exclude congenital MV anomalies) | |
| D) Borderline disease of both the aortic and mitral valves as defined below Borderline RHD (either A, B or C): | |
| A) At least two morphological features of RHD of the MV without pathological MR or MS | |
| B) Pathological MR | |
| C) Pathological AR | |
| Normal echocardiographic findings (all A, B and C); | |
| A) MR that does not meet all four Doppler criteria (physiological MR) | |
| B) AR that does not meet all four Doppler criteria (physiological AR) | |
| C) An isolated morphological feature of RHD of the MV or the AV (e.g. valvar thickening) without any associated pathological stenosis or regurgitation | |
| Definite RHD (either A, B, C or D): | |
| A) Pathological MR and at least two morphological features of RHD of the MV | |
| B) MS mean gradient ≥ to 4 mmHg (NB – exclude congenital MV anomalies) | |
| C) Pathological AR and at least two morphological features of RHD of the AV in those under 35 years of age only. (Bicuspid AV and dilated aortic root must first be excluded) | |
| D) Pathological AR and at least two morphological features of RHD of the MV | |
| Pathological regurgitation | |
| Mitral regurgitation (all four Doppler criteria must be met) | Aortic regurgitation (all four Doppler criteria must be met) |
| 1. Seen in two views | 1. Seen in two views |
| 2. In at least one view jet length ≥ 2 cm | 2. In at least one view jet length ≥ 1 cm |
| 3. Peak velocity ≥ 3 m/s | 3. Peak velocity ≥ 3 m/s |
| 4. Pansystolic jet for at least one envelope | 4. Pandiastolic jet for at least one envelope |
| Morphological features of RHD | |
| Mitral valve | Aortic valve |
| 1. AMVL thickening ≥ 3 mm (age-specific) | 1. Irregular or focal thickening |
| 2. Chordal thickening | 2. Coaptation defect |
| 3. Restricted motion | 3. Restricted motion |
| 4. Excessive leaflet tip motion during systole (hypermobile or flail leaflet) resulting in abnormal coaptation | 4. Prolapse |
RHD, rheumatic heart disease; MR, mitral regurgitation; MV, mitral valve; MS, mitral stenosis; AR, aortic regurgitation; AV, aortic valve; AMVL, anterior mitral valve leaflet.
Fig. 2.Age distribution of the 2 501 Rwandan school children studied echocardiographically.
Summary of echocardiographic findings among the 17 subjects found to have rheumatic valvular heart disease
| Subjects with RHD using WHF criteria | 17 | 13 | 4 | 17 | 0.68 |
| Borderline | Pathological MR | 10 | 3 | 13 | 0.52 |
| Pathological AR | 0 | 0 | |||
| Definite | Pathological MR | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0.16 |
| Pathological AR | 1 | 0 |
For complete 2012 WHF diagnostic criteria in children (and adults), refer to reference 10.
Fig. 3.Age distribution of the 17 subjects diagnosed with rheumatic valvar heart disease using the WHF 2012 echocardiographic criteria.9
Fig. 4.Children assessed as definite or borderline RHD using the morphological and Doppler criteria for RHD according to the WHF 2012 criteria.9
Fig. 5.Example of definite RHD consistent with WHF 2012 criteria. A. Parasternal long-axis (PLAX) view showing thickened anterior mitral leaflet exceeding 3 mm in young adult study subject. B. Colour-flow Doppler interrogation of the mitral valve shows an eccentric jet of mitral regurgitation (MR) with jet length exceeding 2 cm. C. Colour-flow Doppler interrogation of the mitral valve using the apical four-chamber (A4C) view shows eccentric jet of mitral regurgitation with jet length measuring 3.8 cm. D. Continuous-wave (CW) Doppler interrogation of the MR jet showed maximum velocities exceeding 4.7 m/s.
Fig. 6.Example of borderline RHD consistent with WHF 2012 criteria. A. Parasternal long-axis (PLAX) view showing thickened anterior mitral leaflet exceeding 3 mm and restricted leaflet motion in young adult study subject. B. Colour-flow Doppler interrogation of the mitral valve in the PLAX view shows a small jet of mitral regurgitation (MR) with jet length < 2 cm. C. Colour-flow Doppler interrogation of the mitral valve using the A4C view shows jet of mitral regurgitation with jet length < 2 cm. D. Continuous-wave (CW) Doppler interrogation of the MR jet showed maximum velocities exceeding < 3 m/s.