| Literature DB >> 28252638 |
Panchanathan Manivasagan1, Nhat Quang Bui2, Subramaniyan Bharathiraja1, Madhappan Santha Moorthy1, Yun-Ok Oh1, Kyeongeun Song2, Hansu Seo2, Min Yoon3, Junghwan Oh1,2.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28252638 PMCID: PMC5333628 DOI: 10.1038/srep43593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Schematic for the preparation of chitosan-polypyrrole nanocomposites (CS-PPy NCs). A scheme showing the possible mechanism of CS-PPy NCs for photothermal therapy (b) and photoacoustic imaging (c) of cancer.
Figure 2(a) UV-Vis-NIR absorbance spectrum recorded for 150 μg/mL dispersion of CS-PPy NCs in water (The inset shows CS-PPy NCs solution). (b) XRD patterns of chitosan (CS) and CS-PPy NCs. (c) FTIR spectrum of CS and CS-PPy NCs. (d) FETEM image of CS-PPy NCs. (e) Particle size distribution histogram obtained from DLS fitted to the log-normal distribution curve. (f) UV-Vis-NIR absorbance spectrum recorded for 150 μg/mL dispersion of CS-PPy NCs in water and stored at room temperature for 6 months (The inset shows the freshly prepared CS-PPy NCs solution and the 6-month old CS-PPy NCs solution).
Figure 3(a) UV-Vis-NIR absorbance spectrum of different concentrations of CS-PPy NCs in water (The inset photograph shows different concentrations of the CS-PPy NCs solution). The temperature elevation in an aqueous solution of different CS-PPy NCs concentrations (0, 10, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, and 210 μg/mL) as a function of irradiation time by 808 nm laser at different laser power densities: 1.0 W/cm2 (b), 1.5 W/cm2 (c), and 2.0 W/cm2 (d). (e) The temperature elevation of CS-PPy NCs aqueous solution at a concentration of 210 μg/mL under 808-nm laser irradiation at different power densities (0.5 W/cm2, 1.0 W/cm2, 1.5 W/cm2, and 2.0 W/cm2) for 5 min. (f) NIR thermographic images of CS-PPy NCs (210 μg/mL) aqueous solution under exposure to an 808-nm NIR laser at different power densities (0.5 W/cm2, 1.0 W/cm2, 1.5 W/cm2, and 2.0 W/cm2) for 5 min.
Figure 4(a) Temperature elevation of CS-PPy NCs solution at the concentration of 210 μg/mL during for successive five cycles of an on/off NIR laser irradiation (2.0 W/cm2). (b) UV-Vis-NIR absorbance spectrum of CS-PPy NCs in water before and after five laser on/off of NIR light (The inset shows CS-PPy NCs solution in water before and after laser). (c) In vitro cytotoxic effect of CS-PPy NCs against MDA-MB-231 cells at 24 and 48 h. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). (d) Biocompatibility of CS-PPy NCs against HEK 293 cells for 24 h. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). (e) Cell viability assay results for MDA-MB-231 cells after exposure to different concentrations of CS-PPy NCs with or without 808-nm NIR laser irradiation at 2.0 W/cm2 for 5 min. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3) (*Significant p < 0.05; **highly significant p < 0.01). (f) Cell viability of MDA-MB-231 cells after treatment with or without CS-PPy NCs (210 μg/mL) under irradiation of different laser power densities (0.5 W/cm2, 1.0 W/cm2, 1.5 W/cm2, and 2.0 W/cm2) for 5 min. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3) (*Significant p < 0.05).
Figure 5(a) Merged fluorescence microscope images of MDA-MB-231 cells treated with different combinations of CS-PPy NCs (210 μg/mL) under 808-nm NIR laser irradiation at 2.0 W/cm2 for 5 min (10× magnification): control cells; control cells, 5 min irradiation; CS-PPy NCs of 210 μg/mL only; CS-PPy NCs of 210 μg/mL, 5 min irradiation. The cells are stained by AO (live: green) and PI (dead: red). The culture dish photograph of MDA-MB-231 cells. The white circle indicates the laser spot area. The merged fluorescence image of MDA-MB-231 cells after treatment with 210 μg/mL CS-PPy NCs and NIR laser irradiation in 3.5 cm dish. (b) Merged fluorescence microscope images of MDA-MB-231 cells after treatment with or without 210 μg/mL CS-PPy NCs under 808-nm NIR laser irradiation of different laser power densities (0.5 W/cm2, 1.0 W/cm2, 1.5 W/cm2, and 2.0 W/cm2) for 5 min (20× magnification). The cells were stained by AO (live: green) and PI (dead: red).
Figure 6(a) NIR thermographic images of tumor-bearing mice with intratumoral injection of PBS and CS-PPy NCs with 808-nm NIR laser irradiation at 2.0 W/cm2 for 5 min. (b) Temperature change of tumor-bearing mice after intratumoral injection of with PBS and CS-PPy NCs with 808-nm NIR laser irradiation at 2.0 W/cm2 for 5 min. (c) The digital photographs of tumor-bearing mice taken at day 0 before treatment and 20 days after treatment. Error bars correspond to mean ± standard deviation. (d) Tumor volume growth curves of different groups of mice after different treatments. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation. (e) The body weight after different treatments indicated in 20 days. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 7(a) Diagram of a tissue mimicking PVA phantom showing a top view structure. (b and c) Photoacoustic image of control cells and MDA-MB-231 cells treated with two different concentrations of CS-PPy NCs (180 and 210 μg/mL). (d) Three-dimensional (3D) photoacoustic image of control cells and MDA-MB-231 cells treated with two different concentrations of CS-PPy NCs (180 and 210 μg/mL). In vivo photoacoustic images of tumor areas before (e) and after (f) injection of CS-PPy NCs in mice tumors. White arrow indicates the intratumoral injection of CS-PPy NCs in mice.