Literature DB >> 28252557

Complications Associated With Lateral Interbody Fusion: Nationwide Survey of 2998 Cases During the First 2 Years of Its Use in Japan.

Shunsuke Fujibayashi1, Noriaki Kawakami2, Takashi Asazuma3, Manabu Ito4, Jun Mizutani5, Hideki Nagashima6, Masaya Nakamura7, Koichi Sairyo8, Ryuichi Takemasa9, Motoki Iwasaki10.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective nationwide questionnaire-based survey of complications.
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the incidence of complications and risk factors associated with lateral interbody fusion (LIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: After its introduction to Japan in February 2013, the numbers of LIF cases have increased substantially because of the advantages of this minimally invasive procedure. However, LIF has the potential risk of several complications unique to the procedure. Although there are many reports of complications, no nationwide survey has been conducted.
METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to all Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research (JSSR) members. Questionnaires requested information about surgical procedures (XLIF or OLIF), patient characteristics, preoperative diagnosis, complications, salvage procedures, final outcomes, and the surgeon's experience of LIF. The data from replies received between March 2013 and April 2015 were recorded on a web site and the details of complications were analyzed by a JSSR research team.
RESULTS: Seventy-one institutions (12.3%) answered "yes" to LIF experience and 2998 cases (1995 XLIF and 1003 OLIF) were enrolled in this study. The response rate was 86.1%. A total of 540 complications were reported, of which 474 (84.8%) could be further analyzed. The overall complication rate was 18.0%. The most frequent complications were sensory nerve injury (5.1%) and psoas weakness (4.3%) and the majority resolved spontaneously. The rates of major vascular injury, bowel injury, and surgical site infection were 0.03%, 0.03%, and 0.7%, respectively. The overall reoperation rate was 2.2%. Higher rates of sensory nerve injury and psoas weakness were reported for XLIF and higher rates of peritoneal laceration and ureteral injury were reported for OLIF.
CONCLUSION: A nationwide survey of complications associated with LIF was conducted. Although the majority of complications were minor, a relatively high rate of complications was reported. Approach-related specific features of the two procedures were identified. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28252557     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  40 in total

1.  Anatomic evaluation of retroperitoneal organs for lateral approach surgery: a prospective imaging study using computed tomography in the lateral decubitus position.

Authors:  Jun Ouchida; Tokumi Kanemura; Kotaro Satake; Hiroaki Nakashima; Naoki Segi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Complications on minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion at L2-L5 levels: a review of the literature and surgical strategies.

Authors:  Javier Quillo-Olvera; Guang-Xun Lin; Hyun-Jin Jo; Jin-Sung Kim
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

3.  Management of aortic injury during minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Michael M Safaee; Devin Zarkowsky; Charles M Eichler; Murat Pekmezci; Aaron J Clark
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The trajectory characteristics and clinical significance of the left-sided lumbar segmental artery: a prospective cross-sectional radio-anatomical study.

Authors:  Weibo Huang; Ping Zhou; Lin Xie; Hongli Wang; Jianyuan Jiang; Zhongxiong Huang; Chaojun Zheng; Xiaosheng Ma
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-03

5.  A comparative morphometric analysis of operative windows for performing OLIF among normal and deformity group in lower lumbar spine.

Authors:  Devanand Degulmadi; Vatsal Parmar; Bharat Dave; Ajay Krishnan; Shivanand Mayi; Ravi Ranjan Rai; Shiv Bali; Prarthan Amin; Pritesh Agrawal
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-09-30

6.  Extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF) in the management of degenerative scoliosis: a retrospective case series.

Authors:  Konstantinos N Paterakis; Alexandros G Brotis; Athanasios Paschalis; Alkiviadis Tzannis; Konstantinos N Fountas
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-09

7.  Variability in the size of the retroperitoneal oblique corridor: A magnetic resonance imaging-based analysis.

Authors:  Zain Boghani; William Iii Steele; Sean M Barber; Jonathan J Lee; Olumide Sokunbi; J Bob Blacklock; Todd Trask; Paul Holman
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-03-28

8.  Learning Curve and Complications Experience of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion : A Single-Center 143 Consecutive Cases.

Authors:  Bu Kwang Oh; Dong Wuk Son; Su Hun Lee; Jun Seok Lee; Soon Ki Sung; Sang Weon Lee; Geun Sung Song
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2021-04-30

9.  Oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with lateral plate fixation for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Hai-Dong Li; Li Zhong; Ji-Kang Min; Xiang-Qian Fang; Lei-Sheng Jiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  [Research progress of ureteral injury in oblique lumbar interbody fusion].

Authors:  Long Zhao; Jiancheng Zeng; Zhiqiang Yang; Chaoyang Wang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-11-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.