Literature DB >> 28252446

The FLUKA Monte Carlo code coupled with the NIRS approach for clinical dose calculations in carbon ion therapy.

G Magro1, T J Dahle, S Molinelli, M Ciocca, P Fossati, A Ferrari, T Inaniwa, N Matsufuji, K S Ytre-Hauge, A Mairani.   

Abstract

Particle therapy facilities often require Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to overcome intrinsic limitations of analytical treatment planning systems (TPS) related to the description of the mixed radiation field and beam interaction with tissue inhomogeneities. Some of these uncertainties may affect the computation of effective dose distributions; therefore, particle therapy dedicated MC codes should provide both absorbed and biological doses. Two biophysical models are currently applied clinically in particle therapy: the local effect model (LEM) and the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM). In this paper, we describe the coupling of the NIRS (National Institute for Radiological Sciences, Japan) clinical dose to the FLUKA MC code. We moved from the implementation of the model itself to its application in clinical cases, according to the NIRS approach, where a scaling factor is introduced to rescale the (carbon-equivalent) biological dose to a clinical dose level. A high level of agreement was found with published data by exploring a range of values for the MKM input parameters, while some differences were registered in forward recalculations of NIRS patient plans, mainly attributable to differences with the analytical TPS dose engine (taken as reference) in describing the mixed radiation field (lateral spread and fragmentation). We presented a tool which is being used at the Italian National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy to support the comparison study between the NIRS clinical dose level and the LEM dose specification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28252446     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa642b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

1.  Technical Design Report for a Carbon-11 Treatment Facility.

Authors:  Liviu Penescu; Thierry Stora; Simon Stegemann; Johanna Pitters; Elisa Fiorina; Ricardo Dos Santos Augusto; Claus Schmitzer; Fredrik Wenander; Katia Parodi; Alfredo Ferrari; Thomas E Cocolios
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-25

Review 2.  Evolution of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences in Japan.

Authors:  Osama Mohamad; Hirokazu Makishima; Tadashi Kamada
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  Rectum Dose Constraints for Carbon Ion Therapy: Relative Biological Effectiveness Model Dependence in Relation to Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Kyungdon Choi; Silvia Molinelli; Stefania Russo; Alfredo Mirandola; Maria Rosaria Fiore; Barbara Vischioni; Piero Fossati; Rachele Petrucci; Irene Turturici; Jon Espen Dale; Francesca Valvo; Mario Ciocca; Andrea Mairani
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Spot-Scanning Hadron Arc (SHArc) Therapy: A Study With Light and Heavy Ions.

Authors:  Stewart Mein; Thomas Tessonnier; Benedikt Kopp; Semi Harrabi; Amir Abdollahi; Jürgen Debus; Thomas Haberer; Andrea Mairani
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-02-04

5.  Brainstem NTCP and Dose Constraints for Carbon Ion RT-Application and Translation From Japanese to European RBE-Weighted Dose.

Authors:  Jon Espen Dale; Silvia Molinelli; Barbara Vischioni; Viviana Vitolo; Maria Bonora; Giuseppe Magro; Andrea Mairani; Azusa Hasegawa; Tatsuya Ohno; Olav Dahl; Francesca Valvo; Piero Fossati
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  FRoG-A New Calculation Engine for Clinical Investigations with Proton and Carbon Ion Beams at CNAO.

Authors:  KyungDon Choi; Stewart B Mein; Benedikt Kopp; Giuseppe Magro; Silvia Molinelli; Mario Ciocca; Andrea Mairani
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.