Literature DB >> 28251573

Molecular Structures and Momentum Transfer Cross Sections: The Influence of the Analyte Charge Distribution.

Meggie N Young1, Christian Bleiholder2,3.   

Abstract

Structure elucidation by ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry methods is based on the comparison of an experimentally measured momentum transfer cross-section to cross-sections calculated for model structures. Thus, it is imperative that the calculated cross-section must be accurate. However, it is not fully understood how important it is to accurately model the charge distribution of an analyte ion when calculating momentum transfer cross-sections. Here, we calculate and compare momentum transfer cross-sections for carbon clusters that differ in mass, charge state, and mode of charge distribution, and vary temperature and polarizability of the buffer gas. Our data indicate that the detailed distribution of the ion charge density is intimately linked to the contribution of glancing collisions to the momentum transfer cross-section. The data suggest that analyte ions with molecular mass ~3 kDa or momentum transfer cross-section 400-500 Å2 would be significantly influenced by the charge distribution in nitrogen buffer gas. Our data further suggest that accurate structure elucidation on the basis of IMS-MS data measured in nitrogen buffer gas must account for the molecular charge distribution even for systems as large as C960 (~12 kDa) when localized charges are present and/or measurements are conducted under cryogenic temperatures. Finally, our data underscore that accurate structure elucidation is unlikely if ion mobility data recorded in one buffer gas is converted into other buffer gases when electronic properties of the buffer gases differ. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ion mobility spectrometry; Ion-neutral interaction potential; Mass spectrometry; Momentum transfer cross-section

Year:  2017        PMID: 28251573     DOI: 10.1007/s13361-017-1605-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  34 in total

1.  Using different drift gases to change separation factors (alpha) in ion mobility spectrometry

Authors: 
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Structural characterization of drug-like compounds by ion mobility mass spectrometry: comparison of theoretical and experimentally derived nitrogen collision cross sections.

Authors:  Iain Campuzano; Matthew F Bush; Carol V Robinson; Claire Beaumont; Keith Richardson; Hyungjun Kim; Hugh I Kim
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Efficient algorithms for Hirshfeld-I charges.

Authors:  Kati Finzel; Ángel Martín Pendás; Evelio Francisco
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Folding of Protein Ions in the Gas Phase after Cation-to-Anion Proton-Transfer Reactions.

Authors:  Kenneth J Laszlo; Eleanor B Munger; Matthew F Bush
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Evidence for macromolecular protein rings in the absence of bulk water.

Authors:  Brandon T Ruotolo; Kevin Giles; Iain Campuzano; Alan M Sandercock; Robert H Bateman; Carol V Robinson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Ion mobility-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Abu B Kanu; Prabha Dwivedi; Maggie Tam; Laura Matz; Herbert H Hill
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.982

7.  Amyloid-β protein oligomerization and the importance of tetramers and dodecamers in the aetiology of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Summer L Bernstein; Nicholas F Dupuis; Noel D Lazo; Thomas Wyttenbach; Margaret M Condron; Gal Bitan; David B Teplow; Joan-Emma Shea; Brandon T Ruotolo; Carol V Robinson; Michael T Bowers
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 24.427

8.  Human islet amyloid polypeptide monomers form ordered beta-hairpins: a possible direct amyloidogenic precursor.

Authors:  Nicholas F Dupuis; Chun Wu; Joan-Emma Shea; Michael T Bowers
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Experimental and theoretical investigation into the correlation between mass and ion mobility for choline and other ammonium cations in N2.

Authors:  Hyungjun Kim; Hugh I Kim; Paul V Johnson; Luther W Beegle; J L Beauchamp; William A Goddard; Isik Kanik
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  Characterizing ion mobility-mass spectrometry conformation space for the analysis of complex biological samples.

Authors:  Larissa S Fenn; Michal Kliman; Ablatt Mahsut; Sophie R Zhao; John A McLean
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 4.142

View more
  3 in total

1.  Resolving Heparan Sulfate Oligosaccharide Positional Isomers Using Hydrophilic Interaction Liquid Chromatography-Cyclic Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Gustavo J Cavallero; Joseph Zaia
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  A Review of State of the Art in Phosphine Ligated Gold Clusters and Application in Catalysis.

Authors:  Rohul H Adnan; Jenica Marie L Madridejos; Abdulrahman S Alotabi; Gregory F Metha; Gunther G Andersson
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 17.521

Review 3.  Recommendations for reporting ion mobility Mass Spectrometry measurements.

Authors:  Valérie Gabelica; Alexandre A Shvartsburg; Carlos Afonso; Perdita Barran; Justin L P Benesch; Christian Bleiholder; Michael T Bowers; Aivett Bilbao; Matthew F Bush; J Larry Campbell; Iain D G Campuzano; Tim Causon; Brian H Clowers; Colin S Creaser; Edwin De Pauw; Johann Far; Francisco Fernandez-Lima; John C Fjeldsted; Kevin Giles; Michael Groessl; Christopher J Hogan; Stephan Hann; Hugh I Kim; Ruwan T Kurulugama; Jody C May; John A McLean; Kevin Pagel; Keith Richardson; Mark E Ridgeway; Frédéric Rosu; Frank Sobott; Konstantinos Thalassinos; Stephen J Valentine; Thomas Wyttenbach
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 10.946

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.