Literature DB >> 28250097

Grasping with a soft glove: intrinsic impedance control in pneumatic actuators.

P Paoletti1, G W Jones2, L Mahadevan3,4,5,6.   

Abstract

The interaction of a robotic manipulator with unknown soft objects represents a significant challenge for traditional robotic platforms because of the difficulty in controlling the grasping force between a soft object and a stiff manipulator. Soft robotic actuators inspired by elephant trunks, octopus limbs and muscular hydrostats are suggestive of ways to overcome this fundamental difficulty. In particular, the large intrinsic compliance of soft manipulators such as 'pneu-nets'-pneumatically actuated elastomeric structures-makes them ideal for applications that require interactions with an uncertain mechanical and geometrical environment. Using a simple theoretical model, we show how the geometric and material nonlinearities inherent in the passive mechanical response of such devices can be used to grasp soft objects using force control, and stiff objects using position control, without any need for active sensing or feedback control. Our study is suggestive of a general principle for designing actuators with autonomous intrinsic impedance control.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioinspired design; grasping; impedance control; soft robotics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28250097      PMCID: PMC5378126          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  7 in total

1.  Multigait soft robot.

Authors:  Robert F Shepherd; Filip Ilievski; Wonjae Choi; Stephen A Morin; Adam A Stokes; Aaron D Mazzeo; Xin Chen; Michael Wang; George M Whitesides
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Soft robotics for chemists.

Authors:  Filip Ilievski; Aaron D Mazzeo; Robert F Shepherd; Xin Chen; George M Whitesides
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 3.  Design, fabrication and control of soft robots.

Authors:  Daniela Rus; Michael T Tolley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics.

Authors:  Sangbae Kim; Cecilia Laschi; Barry Trimmer
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 19.536

5.  Exploiting short-term memory in soft body dynamics as a computational resource.

Authors:  K Nakajima; T Li; H Hauser; R Pfeifer
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Modeling locomotion of a soft-bodied arthropod using inverse dynamics.

Authors:  Frank Saunders; Barry A Trimmer; Jason Rife
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.956

Review 7.  Soft Robotics: New Perspectives for Robot Bodyware and Control.

Authors:  Cecilia Laschi; Matteo Cianchetti
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2014-01-30
  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Active entanglement enables stochastic, topological grasping.

Authors:  Kaitlyn Becker; Clark Teeple; Nicholas Charles; Yeonsu Jung; Daniel Baum; James C Weaver; L Mahadevan; Robert Wood
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Assisting Forearm Function in Children With Movement Disorders via A Soft Wearable Robot With Equilibrium-Point Control.

Authors:  Jonathan Realmuto; Terence D Sanger
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-06-15

Review 3.  Artificial Venus Flytraps: A Research Review and Outlook on Their Importance for Novel Bioinspired Materials Systems.

Authors:  Falk J Esser; Philipp Auth; Thomas Speck
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2020-07-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.