Literature DB >> 28249938

Remifentanil for procedural sedation: a systematic review of the literature.

Magdalena Kisilewicz1, Hans Rosenberg2, Christian Vaillancourt2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the performance characteristics of remifentanil as an agent of procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) for adult and paediatric patients undergoing procedures similar to those executed in the ED.
METHODS: We systematically reviewed electronically published literature, grey literature, conference proceedings and trial registries from 1946 to 2015. Outcome measures included PSA effectiveness, recovery time, patient safety and resource management. We performed narrative summary analyses. Heterogeneity among selected studies precluded meta-analysis.
RESULTS: We found 1525 citations, reviewed 34 full manuscripts (kappa=0.64) and included 10 studies (kappa=0.71). Seven were randomised controlled trials and three studies took place in the ED. Included procedures were lumbar puncture (80), cardioversion (66), orthopaedic manipulation (63), incision and drainage (15), thoracostomy (8) and nasal packing (2). There was extensive variation in remifentanil dosing (0.15- 1.5 μg/kg), administration protocols and use of additional PSA drugs. All studies noted superior or equivalent sedation effectiveness compared withcontrols. Several studies, including all those performed in the ED, noted faster procedure completion or patient recovery with remifentanil compared with control groups. The most commonly reported adverse event was respiratory depression, especially in paediatric patients. All studies were found to carry significant risk of bias.
CONCLUSIONS: There is currently a lack of high-quality data on the use of remifentanil in the ED. Physicians should exert caution when using remifentanil in the absence of published standardised dosing protocols in light of frequently reported paediatric respiratory depression. However, PSA efficacy combined with faster recovery times merit ongoing investigations into its use. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  analgesia/pain control; emergency department

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28249938     DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2016-206129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

1.  Procedural sedation and analgesia during enzymatic debridement of burn patients.

Authors:  R Galeiras; M Mourelo; S Pértega; M E López; I Esmorís
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2018-09-30

2.  Comparison of Tranexamic acid, Remifentanil, and Hydralazine on the bleeding volume during Dacryocystorhinostomy surgery.

Authors:  Darioush Moradi Farsani; Hamidreza Shetabi; Aryan Rafiee Zadeh; Niloofar Saffari Rad
Journal:  Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-15

3.  Remifentanil for Carboprost-Induced Adverse Reactions During Cesarean Delivery Under Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia.

Authors:  Chang-Na Wei; Xiang-Yang Chang; Jin-Hua Dong; Qing-He Zhou
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Effects of remifentanil on the recovery quality among pediatric candidates for dental procedures under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Nosrat Nourbakhsh; Nasser Kaviani; Reza Salari-Moghaddam; Shirin Marzoughi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2022-02-28

5.  Effect of dexamethasone on intraoperative remifentanil dose in total knee arthroplasty surgery under general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Maria Gantzel; Kasper Smidt Gasbjerg; Daniel Hägi-Pedersen; Christian Sylvest Meyhoff; Markus Harboe Olsen; Ole Mathiesen; Janus Christian Jakobsen; Troels Haxholdt Lunn
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.274

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.