Peter P Toth1, Olivier Descamps2, Jacques Genest2, Naveed Sattar2, David Preiss2, Ricardo Dent2, Constantine Djedjos2, Yuna Wu2, Michelle Geller2, Magdalena Uhart2, Ransi Somaratne2, Scott M Wasserman2. 1. From CGH Medical Center, Sterling, IL, and Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (P.P.T.); Lipid Clinic, Centres Hospitaliers Jolimont, Haine-Saint-Paul, Belgium (O.D.); The McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada (J.G.); Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK (N.S.); Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, UK (D.P.); and Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA (R.D., C.D., Y.W., M.G., M.U., R.S., S.M.W.). peter.toth@cghmc.com. 2. From CGH Medical Center, Sterling, IL, and Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (P.P.T.); Lipid Clinic, Centres Hospitaliers Jolimont, Haine-Saint-Paul, Belgium (O.D.); The McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada (J.G.); Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK (N.S.); Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, UK (D.P.); and Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA (R.D., C.D., Y.W., M.G., M.U., R.S., S.M.W.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Evolocumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9), markedly reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol across diverse patient populations. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and tolerability of evolocumab in a pooled safety analysis from phase 2 or 3 randomized and placebo or comparator-controlled trials (integrated parent trials) and the first year of open-label extension (OLE) trials that included a standard-of-care control group. METHODS: This analysis included adverse event (AE) data from 6026 patients in 12 phase 2 and 3 parent trials, with a median exposure of 2.8 months, and, of those patients, from 4465 patients who continued with a median follow-up of 11.1 months in 2 OLE trials. AEs were analyzed separately for the parent and OLE trials. Overall AE rates, serious AEs, laboratory assessments, and AEs of interest were evaluated. RESULTS:Overall AE rates were similar between evolocumab and control in the parent trials (51.1% versus 49.6%) and in year 1 of OLE trials (70.0% versus 66.0%), as were those for serious AEs. Elevations of serum transaminases, bilirubin, and creatine kinase were infrequent and similar between groups. Muscle-related AEs were similar between evolocumab and control. Neurocognitive AEs were infrequent and balanced during the double-blind parent studies (5 events [0.1%], evolocumab groups versus 6 events [0.3%], control groups). In the OLE trials, 27 patients (0.9%) in the evolocumab groups and 5 patients (0.3%) in the control groups reported neurocognitive AEs. No neutralizing antievolocumab antibodies were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this integrated safety analysis of 6026 patients pooled across phase 2/3 trials and 4465 patients who continued in OLE trials for 1 year supports a favorable benefit-risk profile for evolocumab.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Evolocumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9), markedly reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol across diverse patient populations. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and tolerability of evolocumab in a pooled safety analysis from phase 2 or 3 randomized and placebo or comparator-controlled trials (integrated parent trials) and the first year of open-label extension (OLE) trials that included a standard-of-care control group. METHODS: This analysis included adverse event (AE) data from 6026 patients in 12 phase 2 and 3 parent trials, with a median exposure of 2.8 months, and, of those patients, from 4465 patients who continued with a median follow-up of 11.1 months in 2 OLE trials. AEs were analyzed separately for the parent and OLE trials. Overall AE rates, serious AEs, laboratory assessments, and AEs of interest were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall AE rates were similar between evolocumab and control in the parent trials (51.1% versus 49.6%) and in year 1 of OLE trials (70.0% versus 66.0%), as were those for serious AEs. Elevations of serum transaminases, bilirubin, and creatine kinase were infrequent and similar between groups. Muscle-related AEs were similar between evolocumab and control. Neurocognitive AEs were infrequent and balanced during the double-blind parent studies (5 events [0.1%], evolocumab groups versus 6 events [0.3%], control groups). In the OLE trials, 27 patients (0.9%) in the evolocumab groups and 5 patients (0.3%) in the control groups reported neurocognitive AEs. No neutralizing antievolocumab antibodies were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this integrated safety analysis of 6026 patients pooled across phase 2/3 trials and 4465 patients who continued in OLE trials for 1 year supports a favorable benefit-risk profile for evolocumab.