M C Boonstra1, P B A A Van Driel2, S Keereweer3, H A J M Prevoo1, M A Stammes4, V M Baart1, C W G M Löwik2, A P Mazar5, C J H van de Velde1, A L Vahrmeijer1, C F M Sier6. 1. Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands. 2. Department of Radiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands. 3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, and Head & Neck Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands. 4. Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands; Percuros BV, Enschede, Netherlands. 5. Monopar Therapeutics Inc, Northbrook, IL, United States. 6. Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands; Antibodies for Research Applications BV, Gouda, Netherlands. Electronic address: c.f.m.sier@lumc.nl.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Establishing adequate resection margins and lymphatic mapping are crucial for the prognosis of oral cancer patients. Novel targeted imaging modalities are needed, enabling pre- and intraoperative detection of tumour cells, in combination with improved post-surgical examination by the pathologist. The urokinase-receptor (uPAR) is overexpressed in head and neck cancer, where it is associated with tumour progression and metastasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To determine suitability of uPAR for molecular imaging of oral cancer surgery, human head and neck tumours were sectioned and stained for uPAR to evaluate the expression pattern compared to normal mucosa. Furthermore, metastatic oral squamous carcinoma cell line OSC-19 was used for targeting uPAR in in vivo mouse models. Using anti-uPAR antibody ATN-658, equipped with a multimodal label, the in vivo specificity was investigated and the optimal dose and time-window were evaluated. RESULTS: All human oral cancer tissues expressed uPAR in epithelial and stromal cells. Hybrid ATN-658 clearly visualized tongue tumours in mice using either NIRF or SPECT imaging. Mean fluorescent TBRs over time were 4.3±0.7 with the specific tracer versus 1.7±0.1 with a control antibody. A significant difference in TBRs could be seen between 1nmol (150μg) and 0.34nmol (50μg) dose groups (n=4, p<0.05). Co-expression between BLI, GFP and the NIR fluorescent signals were seen in the tongue tumour, whereas human cytokeratin staining confirmed presence of malignant cells in the positive cervical lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: This study shows the applicability of an uPAR specific multimodal tracer in an oral cancer model, combining SPECT with intraoperative guidance.
OBJECTIVES: Establishing adequate resection margins and lymphatic mapping are crucial for the prognosis of oral cancerpatients. Novel targeted imaging modalities are needed, enabling pre- and intraoperative detection of tumour cells, in combination with improved post-surgical examination by the pathologist. The urokinase-receptor (uPAR) is overexpressed in head and neck cancer, where it is associated with tumour progression and metastasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To determine suitability of uPAR for molecular imaging of oral cancer surgery, human head and neck tumours were sectioned and stained for uPAR to evaluate the expression pattern compared to normal mucosa. Furthermore, metastatic oral squamous carcinoma cell line OSC-19 was used for targeting uPAR in in vivo mouse models. Using anti-uPAR antibody ATN-658, equipped with a multimodal label, the in vivo specificity was investigated and the optimal dose and time-window were evaluated. RESULTS: All humanoral cancer tissues expressed uPAR in epithelial and stromal cells. Hybrid ATN-658 clearly visualized tongue tumours in mice using either NIRF or SPECT imaging. Mean fluorescent TBRs over time were 4.3±0.7 with the specific tracer versus 1.7±0.1 with a control antibody. A significant difference in TBRs could be seen between 1nmol (150μg) and 0.34nmol (50μg) dose groups (n=4, p<0.05). Co-expression between BLI, GFP and the NIR fluorescent signals were seen in the tongue tumour, whereas human cytokeratin staining confirmed presence of malignant cells in the positive cervical lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: This study shows the applicability of an uPAR specific multimodal tracer in an oral cancer model, combining SPECT with intraoperative guidance.
Authors: Julie M Leth; Haydyn D T Mertens; Katrine Zinck Leth-Espensen; Thomas J D Jørgensen; Michael Ploug Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2019-03-20 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Julie Maja Leth; Katrine Zinck Leth-Espensen; Kristian Kølby Kristensen; Anni Kumari; Anne-Marie Lund Winther; Stephen G Young; Michael Ploug Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2019-06-05 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: V M Baart; R D Houvast; L F de Geus-Oei; P H A Quax; P J K Kuppen; A L Vahrmeijer; C F M Sier Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2020-07-28 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: Lianne M Wellens; Marion M Deken; Cornelis F M Sier; Hannah R Johnson; Fàtima de la Jara Ortiz; Shadhvi S Bhairosingh; Ruben D Houvast; Waleed M Kholosy; Victor M Baart; Annique M M J Pieters; Ronald R de Krijger; Jan J Molenaar; Ellen J Wehrens; Johanna F Dekkers; Marc H W A Wijnen; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Anne C Rios Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Pieterjan Debie; Noemi B Declerck; Danny van Willigen; Celine M Huygen; Bieke De Sloovere; Lukasz Mateusiak; Jessica Bridoux; Janik Puttemans; Nick Devoogdt; Fijs W B van Leeuwen; Sophie Hernot Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2021-02-26
Authors: Bertine W Huisman; Merve Cankat; Tjalling Bosse; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Robert Rissmann; Jacobus Burggraaf; Cornelis F M Sier; Mariette I E van Poelgeest Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-11-29 Impact factor: 6.639