BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) in university students has not been analyzed with specific questionnaires tailored to this population. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyze the validity of three PA questionnaires developed on other populations comparing with accelerometer values: counts and moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) calculated with uniaxial and triaxial cut points. METHODS: One hundred and forty-five university students (of whom, 92 women) from Spain wore an accelerometer GT3X or GTX+ to collect PA data of 7 full days. Three questionnaires, Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adults (PAQ-AD), Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaire (APALQ), and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF) were administrated jointly with the collection of accelerometer values. Finally, after the application of inclusion criteria, data from 95 participants (62 women) with a mean age of 21.96±2.33 years were analyzed to compare the instruments measures. RESULTS: The correlational analysis showed that PAQ-AD (0.44-0.56) and IPAQ-SF (0.26-0.69) questionnaires were significantly related to accelerometers scores: counts, uniaxial MVPA and triaxial MVPA. Conversely, APALQ displayed no significant relations for males with accelerometers scores for MVPA created with both cut points. CONCLUSIONS: PAQ-AD and IPAQ-SF questionnaires have shown adequate validity to use with Spanish university students. The use of counts to validate self-report data in order to reduce the variability display by MVPA created with different cut points is discussed. Finally, validated instruments to measure PA in university students will allow implementation of strategies for PA promotion based on reliable data.
BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) in university students has not been analyzed with specific questionnaires tailored to this population. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyze the validity of three PA questionnaires developed on other populations comparing with accelerometer values: counts and moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) calculated with uniaxial and triaxial cut points. METHODS: One hundred and forty-five university students (of whom, 92 women) from Spain wore an accelerometer GT3X or GTX+ to collect PA data of 7 full days. Three questionnaires, Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adults (PAQ-AD), Assessment of Physical Activity Questionnaire (APALQ), and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF) were administrated jointly with the collection of accelerometer values. Finally, after the application of inclusion criteria, data from 95 participants (62 women) with a mean age of 21.96±2.33 years were analyzed to compare the instruments measures. RESULTS: The correlational analysis showed that PAQ-AD (0.44-0.56) and IPAQ-SF (0.26-0.69) questionnaires were significantly related to accelerometers scores: counts, uniaxial MVPA and triaxial MVPA. Conversely, APALQ displayed no significant relations for males with accelerometers scores for MVPA created with both cut points. CONCLUSIONS:PAQ-AD and IPAQ-SF questionnaires have shown adequate validity to use with Spanish university students. The use of counts to validate self-report data in order to reduce the variability display by MVPA created with different cut points is discussed. Finally, validated instruments to measure PA in university students will allow implementation of strategies for PA promotion based on reliable data.
Authors: Pedro Manuel Rodríguez-Muñoz; Juan Manuel Carmona-Torres; Cristina Rivera-Picón; Fabio Fabbian; Roberto Manfredini; María Aurora Rodríguez-Borrego; Pablo Jesús López-Soto Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Shahina Pardhan; Lee Smith; Rupert Bourne; Adrian Davis; Nicolas Leveziel; Louis Jacob; Ai Koyanagi; Guillermo F López-Sánchez Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2021-01-18
Authors: Kaja Meh; Vedrana Sember; Saša Đurić; Henri Vähä-Ypyä; Paulo Rocha; Gregor Jurak Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-31 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Javier Bueno-Antequera; Carmen Mayolas-Pi; Joaquin Reverter-Masià; Isaac López-Laval; Miguel Ángel Oviedo-Caro; Diego Munguía-Izquierdo; Mercedes Ruidíaz-Peña; Alejandro Legaz-Arrese Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-06-11 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Cristina Romero-Blanco; Julián Rodríguez-Almagro; María Dolores Onieva-Zafra; María Laura Parra-Fernández; María Del Carmen Prado-Laguna; Antonio Hernández-Martínez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Vedrana Sember; Kaja Meh; Maroje Sorić; Gregor Starc; Paulo Rocha; Gregor Jurak Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-30 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Gemma Biviá-Roig; Ana Boldó-Roda; Ruth Blasco-Sanz; Lola Serrano-Raya; Elena DelaFuente-Díez; Pedro Múzquiz-Barberá; Juan Francisco Lisón Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-07-19