Oana M Dumitrascu1, Sam Torbati, Mourad Tighiouart, David E Newman-Toker, Shlee S Song. 1. Departments of *Neurology †Emergency Medicine ‡Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA §Departments of Neurology and Otolaryngology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Isolated acute vestibular syndrome (iAVS) presentations to the emergency department (ED) pose management challenges, given the concerns for posterior circulation strokes. False-negative brain imaging may erroneously reassure clinicians, whereas HINTS-plus examination outperforms imaging to screen for strokes in iAVS. We studied the feasibility of implementing HINTS-plus testing in the ED, aiming to reduce neuroimaging in patients with iAVS. METHODS: We launched an institutional Quality Improvement initiative, using DMAIC methodology. The outcome measures [proportion of iAVS subjects who had HINTS-plus examinations and underwent neuroimaging by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI)] were compared before and after the established intervention. The intervention consisted of formal training for neurologists and emergency physicians on how to perform, document, and interpret HINTS-plus and implementation of novel iAVS management algorithm. Neuroimaging was not recommended if HINTS-plus suggested peripheral vestibular etiology. If a central process was suspected, brain MRI/MR angiogram was performed. Head CT was reserved only for thrombolytic time-window cases. RESULTS: In the first 2 months postimplementation, HINTS-plus testing performance by neurologists increased from 0% to 80% (P=0.007), and by ED providers from 0% to 9.09% (P=0.367). Head CT scans were reduced from 18.5% to 6.25%. Brain MRI use was reduced from 51.8% to 31.2%. About 60% of the iAVS subjects were discharged from the ED; none were readmitted or had another ED presentation in the ensuing 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of HINTS-plus evaluation in the ED is valuable and feasible for neurologists, but challenging for emergency physicians. Future studies should determine the "dose-response" curve of educational interventions.
OBJECTIVES: Isolated acute vestibular syndrome (iAVS) presentations to the emergency department (ED) pose management challenges, given the concerns for posterior circulation strokes. False-negative brain imaging may erroneously reassure clinicians, whereas HINTS-plus examination outperforms imaging to screen for strokes in iAVS. We studied the feasibility of implementing HINTS-plus testing in the ED, aiming to reduce neuroimaging in patients with iAVS. METHODS: We launched an institutional Quality Improvement initiative, using DMAIC methodology. The outcome measures [proportion of iAVS subjects who had HINTS-plus examinations and underwent neuroimaging by computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI)] were compared before and after the established intervention. The intervention consisted of formal training for neurologists and emergency physicians on how to perform, document, and interpret HINTS-plus and implementation of novel iAVS management algorithm. Neuroimaging was not recommended if HINTS-plus suggested peripheral vestibular etiology. If a central process was suspected, brain MRI/MR angiogram was performed. Head CT was reserved only for thrombolytic time-window cases. RESULTS: In the first 2 months postimplementation, HINTS-plus testing performance by neurologists increased from 0% to 80% (P=0.007), and by ED providers from 0% to 9.09% (P=0.367). Head CT scans were reduced from 18.5% to 6.25%. Brain MRI use was reduced from 51.8% to 31.2%. About 60% of the iAVS subjects were discharged from the ED; none were readmitted or had another ED presentation in the ensuing 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of HINTS-plus evaluation in the ED is valuable and feasible for neurologists, but challenging for emergency physicians. Future studies should determine the "dose-response" curve of educational interventions.
Authors: Alexander A Tarnutzer; Aaron L Berkowitz; Karen A Robinson; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; David E Newman-Toker Journal: CMAJ Date: 2011-05-16 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Charles D Kassardjian; Michelle L Williamson; Dorothy J van Buskirk; Floranne C Ernste; Andrea N Leep Hunderfund Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Ali S Saber Tehrani; Diarmuid Coughlan; Yu Hsiang Hsieh; Georgios Mantokoudis; Fredrick K Korley; Kevin A Kerber; Kevin D Frick; David E Newman-Toker Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: David E Newman-Toker; Kevin A Kerber; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; John H Pula; Rodney Omron; Ali S Saber Tehrani; Georgios Mantokoudis; Daniel F Hanley; David S Zee; Jorge C Kattah Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 3.451