John D Lyons1, Craig M Coopersmith. 1. Both authors: Department of Surgery and Emory Critical Care Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe and summarize the data supporting the gut as the motor driving critical illness and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome presented at the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development MODS Workshop (March 26-27, 2015). DATA SOURCES: Summary of workshop keynote presentation. STUDY SELECTION: Not applicable. DATA EXTRACTION: Presented by an expert in the field, the data assessing the role of gastrointestinal dysfunction driving critical illness were described with a focus on identifying knowledge gaps and research priorities. DATA SYNTHESIS: Summary of presentation and discussion supported and supplemented by relevant literature. CONCLUSIONS: The understanding of gut dysfunction in critical illness has evolved greatly over time, and the gut is now often considered as the "motor" of critical illness. The association of the gut with critical illness is supported by both animal models and clinical studies. Initially, the association between gut dysfunction and critical illness focused primarily on bacterial translocation into the bloodstream. However, that work has evolved to include other gut-derived products causing distant injury via other routes (e.g., lymphatics). Additionally, alterations in the gut epithelium may be associated with critical illness and influence outcomes. Gut epithelial apoptosis, intestinal hyperpermeability, and perturbations in the intestinal mucus layer have all been associated with critical illness. Finally, there is growing evidence that the intestinal microbiome plays a crucial role in mediating pathology in critical illness. Further research is needed to better understand the role of each of these mechanisms and their contribution to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in children.
OBJECTIVE: To describe and summarize the data supporting the gut as the motor driving critical illness and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome presented at the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development MODS Workshop (March 26-27, 2015). DATA SOURCES: Summary of workshop keynote presentation. STUDY SELECTION: Not applicable. DATA EXTRACTION: Presented by an expert in the field, the data assessing the role of gastrointestinal dysfunction driving critical illness were described with a focus on identifying knowledge gaps and research priorities. DATA SYNTHESIS: Summary of presentation and discussion supported and supplemented by relevant literature. CONCLUSIONS: The understanding of gut dysfunction in critical illness has evolved greatly over time, and the gut is now often considered as the "motor" of critical illness. The association of the gut with critical illness is supported by both animal models and clinical studies. Initially, the association between gut dysfunction and critical illness focused primarily on bacterial translocation into the bloodstream. However, that work has evolved to include other gut-derived products causing distant injury via other routes (e.g., lymphatics). Additionally, alterations in the gut epithelium may be associated with critical illness and influence outcomes. Gut epithelial apoptosis, intestinal hyperpermeability, and perturbations in the intestinal mucus layer have all been associated with critical illness. Finally, there is growing evidence that the intestinal microbiome plays a crucial role in mediating pathology in critical illness. Further research is needed to better understand the role of each of these mechanisms and their contribution to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in children.
Authors: Lulong Bo; Jinbao Li; Tianzhu Tao; Yu Bai; Xiaofei Ye; Richard S Hotchkiss; Marin H Kollef; Neil H Crooks; Xiaoming Deng Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2014-10-25
Authors: R S Hotchkiss; P E Swanson; B D Freeman; K W Tinsley; J P Cobb; G M Matuschak; T G Buchman; I E Karl Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Els van Nood; Anne Vrieze; Max Nieuwdorp; Susana Fuentes; Erwin G Zoetendal; Willem M de Vos; Caroline E Visser; Ed J Kuijper; Joep F W M Bartelsman; Jan G P Tijssen; Peter Speelman; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Josbert J Keller Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mei Meng; Nathan J Klingensmith; Zhe Liang; John D Lyons; Katherine T Fay; Ching-Wen Chen; Mandy L Ford; Craig M Coopersmith Journal: Shock Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: C Adam Lorentz; Zhe Liang; Mei Meng; Ching-Wen Chen; Benyam P Yoseph; Elise R Breed; Rohit Mittal; Nathan J Klingensmith; Alton B Farris; Eileen M Burd; Michael Koval; Mandy L Ford; Craig M Coopersmith Journal: Mol Med Date: 2017-06-07 Impact factor: 6.354
Authors: Craig M Coopersmith; Daniel De Backer; Clifford S Deutschman; Ricard Ferrer; Ishaq Lat; Flavia R Machado; Greg S Martin; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Mark E Nunnally; Massimo Antonelli; Laura E Evans; Judith Hellman; Sameer Jog; Jozef Kesecioglu; Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-07-03 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Valentina Di Caro; Alicia M Alcamo; Jessica L Cummings; Robert S B Clark; Elizabeth A Novak; Kevin P Mollen; Michael J Morowitz; Rajesh K Aneja Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 3.240