Literature DB >> 28248410

Low permanent pacemaker rates following Lotus device implantation for transcatheter aortic valve replacement due to modified implantation protocol.

Florian Krackhardt1, Behrouz Kherad, Maximilian Krisper, Burkert Pieske, Michael Laule, Carsten Tschöpe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a common problem. Pacemaker implantation rates after TAVR appear to be higher compared to conventional aortic valve replacement. The aim of this study was to analyze whether a high annulus implantation conveys the benefit of a decreased rate of permanent pacemaker implantation while being safe and successful according to Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 (VARC2)-criteria.
METHODS: A total of 23 patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis, an aortic annulus of 19-27 mm and at high risk for surgery were treated with the Lotus valve. In all patients the valve was implanted in a high annulus position via femoral access. The primary device performance endpoint was VARC2-defined device success after 30 days and the primary safety endpoint was the need for permanent pacemaker implantation.
RESULTS: The mean age was 73.23 ± 7.65 years, 46% were female, 38% were New York Heart Association class III/IV at baseline. Thirty-day follow-up data were available for all patients. The VARC2-defined device success rate after 30 days was 22/23 (96%). 2/21 (10%) patients required a newly implanted pacemaker due to 3rd degree atrioventricular block. 25% of the patients developed a new left bundle branch block after valvuloplasty or device implantation. 21 of the 23 patients (96%) had no other signs of conduction disturbances after 30 days.
CONCLUSIONS: The approach of the modified implantation technique of Lotus TAVR device was safe and effective. The incidence of need for a permanent pacemaker following TAVR could be significantly reduced due to adopted implantation protocol.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic stenosis; atrioventricular block; conduction disturbances; permanent pacemaker; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28248410     DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2017.0024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiol J        ISSN: 1898-018X            Impact factor:   2.737


  4 in total

1.  Delayed coronary obstruction after lotus transcatheter aortic valve replacement treated with left main stent in stent implantation.

Authors:  Maximilian Krisper; Marco Toselli; Tobias Daniel Trippel; Burkert Mathias Pieske; Florian Krackhardt
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.737

2.  Predictors of paravalvular regurgitation and permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVR with a next-generation self-expanding device.

Authors:  Victor Mauri; Florian Deuschl; Thomas Frohn; Niklas Schofer; Matthias Linder; Elmar Kuhn; Andreas Schaefer; Volker Rudolph; Navid Madershahian; Lenard Conradi; Tanja K Rudolph; Ulrich Schäfer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Single-center evaluation of a next generation fully repositionable and retrievable transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Karolina Berntorp; Sasha Koul; Shahab Nozohoor; Jan Harnek; Henrik Bjursten; Matthias Götberg
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with Lotus and Sapien 3 prosthetic valves: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mirosław Gozdek; Jakub Ratajczak; Adam Arndt; Kamil Zieliński; Michał Pasierski; Matteo Matteucci; Dario Fina; Federica Jiritano; Paolo Meani; Giuseppe Maria Raffa; Pietro Giorgio Malvindi; Michele Pilato; Domenico Paparella; Artur Słomka; Uri Landes; Ran Kornowski; Jacek Kubica; Roberto Lorusso; Piotr Suwalski; Mariusz Kowalewski
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.005

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.