Tom Hildebrandt1, Elizabeth E Epstein2,3, Robyn Sysko1, Donald A Bux4. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York. 2. Center of Alcohol Studies, Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The type A/B classification model for alcohol use disorders (AUDs) has received considerable empirical support. However, few studies examine the underlying latent structure of this subtyping model, which has been challenged as a dichotomization of a single drinking severity dimension. Type B, relative to type A, alcoholics represent those with early age of onset, greater familial risk, and worse outcomes from alcohol use. METHODS: We examined the latent structure of the type A/B model using categorical, dimensional, and factor mixture models in a mixed-gender community treatment-seeking sample of adults with an AUD. RESULTS: Factor analytic models identified 2 factors (drinking severity/externalizing psychopathology and internalizing psychopathology) underlying the type A/B indicators. A factor mixture model with 2 dimensions and 3 classes emerged as the best overall fitting model. The classes reflected a type A class and 2 type B classes (B1 and B2) that differed on the respective level of drinking severity/externalizing pathology and internalizing pathology. Type B1 had a greater prevalence of women and more internalizing pathology and B2 had a greater prevalence of men and more drinking severity/externalizing pathology. The 2-factor, 3-class model also exhibited predictive validity by explaining significant variance in 12-month drinking and drug use outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The model identified in this study may provide a basis for examining different sources of heterogeneity in the course and outcome of AUDs.
BACKGROUND: The type A/B classification model for alcohol use disorders (AUDs) has received considerable empirical support. However, few studies examine the underlying latent structure of this subtyping model, which has been challenged as a dichotomization of a single drinking severity dimension. Type B, relative to type A, alcoholics represent those with early age of onset, greater familial risk, and worse outcomes from alcohol use. METHODS: We examined the latent structure of the type A/B model using categorical, dimensional, and factor mixture models in a mixed-gender community treatment-seeking sample of adults with an AUD. RESULTS: Factor analytic models identified 2 factors (drinking severity/externalizing psychopathology and internalizing psychopathology) underlying the type A/B indicators. A factor mixture model with 2 dimensions and 3 classes emerged as the best overall fitting model. The classes reflected a type A class and 2 type B classes (B1 and B2) that differed on the respective level of drinking severity/externalizing pathology and internalizing pathology. Type B1 had a greater prevalence of women and more internalizing pathology and B2 had a greater prevalence of men and more drinking severity/externalizing pathology. The 2-factor, 3-class model also exhibited predictive validity by explaining significant variance in 12-month drinking and drug use outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The model identified in this study may provide a basis for examining different sources of heterogeneity in the course and outcome of AUDs.
Authors: Po-Hsiu Kuo; Steven H Aggen; Carol A Prescott; Kenneth S Kendler; Michael C Neale Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2008-06-30 Impact factor: 4.492