Literature DB >> 2824724

Value analysis: a method for teaching nursing ethics and promoting the moral development of students.

N C Frisch1.   

Abstract

In an investigation of junior-level baccalaureate nursing students, the value analysis teaching strategy was used to teach content related to nursing ethics. It was hypothesized that such a strategy, which emphasized the need for careful evaluation and weighing of facts preparatory to drawing conclusions, would impact on the student's level of cognitive moral development. Cognitive moral development was defined in accord with Kohlberg's theory of moral development. Control and experimental populations were derived from two groups of students sequentially enrolled in the same course. Pre- and post-testing using scores on Rest's Defining Issues Test (DIT) showed significant differences in gain between control and experimental subjects. There was a strong association between DIT score gains and self-report of peer discussion of ethical issues. The major implication of this study is that instructional intervention produces measurable change in some students' level of moral judgment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2824724     DOI: 10.3928/0148-4834-19871001-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Educ        ISSN: 0148-4834            Impact factor:   1.726


  8 in total

1.  Gilligan: a voice for nursing?

Authors:  J Harbison
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Are Ethics Training Programs Improving? A Meta-Analytic Review of Past and Present Ethics Instruction in the Sciences.

Authors:  Logan L Watts; Kelsey E Medeiros; Tyler J Mulhearn; Logan M Steele; Shane Connelly; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2016-05-27

Review 3.  Review of Instructional Approaches in Ethics Education.

Authors:  Tyler J Mulhearn; Logan M Steele; Logan L Watts; Kelsey E Medeiros; Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach.

Authors:  E Michelle Todd; Logan L Watts; Tyler J Mulhearn; Brett S Torrence; Megan R Turner; Shane Connelly; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Implementation and evaluation of a near-peer-facilitated medical ethics curriculum for first-year medical students: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mikalyn T DeFoor; Lauren East; Paul C Mann; Carol A Nichols
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-12-06

6.  A Meta-Analysis of Ethics Instruction Effectiveness in the Sciences.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Stephen T Murphy; Ethan P Waples; Michael D Mumford; Ryan P Brown; Shane Connelly; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2009-09-01

Review 7.  A narrative review of undergraduate peer-based healthcare ethics teaching.

Authors:  Thomas Hindmarch; Silvia Allikmets; Felicity Knights
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2015-12-12

8.  Design and psychometric properties of an instrument to assess metacognition in moral reasoning in medicine.

Authors:  Farahnaz Kamali; Alireza Yousefy; Nikoo Yamani
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2019-07-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.