| Literature DB >> 28246456 |
N Sheoran1, R Kumar1, A Kumar2, K Batra2, S Sihag1, S Maan2, N S Maan1.
Abstract
AIM: In this study, a planned research work was conducted to investigate the nutrigenomic aspects of supplementation of Allium sativum (garlic) and Ocimum sanctum (holy basil) leaf powder on the growth performance and immune characteristics of broilers.Entities:
Keywords: broilers; garlic; gene expression; holy basil; toll-like receptors
Year: 2017 PMID: 28246456 PMCID: PMC5301171 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2017.121-129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet World ISSN: 0972-8988
Ingredient (%) and chemical composition (% dry matter [DM] basis) of basal diet.
| Item | Starter diet | Finisher diet |
|---|---|---|
| Ingredient composition (%) | ||
| Maize | 53 | 57 |
| Soybean meal | 19 | 16 |
| Rice police | 3 | 4 |
| Ground nut cake | 12 | 11 |
| Fish meal | 7 | 5 |
| Soybean oil | 4 | 5 |
| Mineral mixture | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| | 0.29 | 0.29 |
| Chemical composition (% DM basis) | ||
| Crude protein | 22.04 | 20.08 |
| Crude fiber | 3.61 | 3.32 |
| Ether extract | 8.38 | 8.98 |
| Total ash | 6.18 | 5.86 |
| | 3056 | 3163 |
Feed additives include Vitamin mixture-I - 10 g, vitamin, amino acid and Ca mixture-II - 20 g, coccidiostat (Dinitro-0-yoluamide) - 50 g, choline chloride - 50 g, Lysine - 50 g, DL- methionine - 80 g and chlortetracycline - 33.5 g/100 kg;
Calculated values - BIS (2007)
Experimental design.
| Treatment groups | Particulars | Number of replicates | Number of birds/replicate | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | Control-standard broiler diet as per BIS (2007) specifications | 4 | 10 | 40 |
| T2 | Control+5 g garlic powder/kg of diet | 4 | 10 | 40 |
| T3 | Control+10 g garlic powder/kg of diet | 4 | 10 | 40 |
| T4 | Control+5 g holy basil leaf powder/kg of diet | 4 | 10 | 40 |
| T5 | Control+10 g holy basil leaf powder/kg of diet | 4 | 10 | 40 |
| T6 | Control+5 g garlic powder/kg of diet+5 g holy basil powder/kg of diet | 4 | 10 | 40 |
| T7 | Control+10 g garlic powder/kg of diet+10 g holy basil powder/kg of diet | 4 | 10 | 40 |
| Total | 280 |
Performance parameters viz. feed intake (g/bird), body weight gain (g/bird) and FCR in broilers under different dietary treatments during overall period of 6 weeks of experiment.
| Treatments | Feed intake (g/bird) | Body weight gain (g/bird) | FCR |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 3771.75±4.23 | 1801.75[ | 2.09[ |
| T2 | 3713.25±11.94 | 1823.00[ | 2.03[ |
| T3 | 3687.25±79.93 | 1873.50[ | 1.96[ |
| T4 | 3645.75±61.90 | 1818.50[ | 2.00[ |
| T5 | 3634.25±17.80 | 1863.25[ | 1.95[ |
| T6 | 3627.50±6.64 | 2129.25[ | 1.70[ |
| T7 | 3640.25±4.23 | 2094.75[ | 1.73[ |
Mean values bearing different superscripts in a column differ significantly (p<0.05); T1: Basal diet, T2: 0.5% garlic powder, T3: 1% garlic powder, T4: 0.5% tulsi leaf powder, T5: 1% tulsi leaf powder, T6: Mixture of garlic powder and tulsi leaf powder at 0.5% each, T7: Mixture of garlic powder and tulsi leaf powder at 1% each, FCR=Feed conversion ratio
Oligonucleotide sequences of sense and antisense primers for real-time PCR products determined.
| Gene[ | Primer | Primer sequence[ | Accession No. | Product size |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β-Actin | Sense | 5′-GAGAAATTGTGCGTGACATCA-3′ | L08165 | 152 |
| Antisense | 5′-CCTGAACCTCTCATTGCCA-3′ | |||
| TLR 2 | Sense | 5′-CATTCACCATGAGGCAGGGATAG-3′ | AB046533 | 157 |
| Antisense | 5′-GGTGCAGATCAAGGACACTAGGA-3′ | |||
| TLR 4 | Sense | 5′-TTCAGAACGGACTCTTGAGTGG-3′ | AY064697 | 131 |
| Antisense | 5′-CAACCGAATAGTGGTGACGTTG-3′ | |||
| TLR 7 | Sense | 5′-TTGCTGCTGTTGTCTTGAGTGAG-3′ | AJ627563 | 182 |
| Antisense | 5′-AACAACAGTGCATTTGACGTCCT-3′ |
TLR 2=Toll-like receptor 2; TLR 4=Toll-like receptor 4; TLR 7=Toll-like receptor 7.
Primers for toll-like receptors and β-actin were described by Sato et al. [27] and Bai et al. [28], respectively
Carcass parameters viz. dressed weight (g), eviscerated weight (g), non-edible weight (g) and drawn weight (g) in broilers under different treatments.
| Treatments | Dressed weight (g) | Eviscerated weight (g) | Non-edible weight (g) | Drawn weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 1284.85[ | 1071.59[ | 503.75±2.12 | 1108.07[ |
| T2 | 1326.42[ | 1093.38[ | 452.97±1.59 | 1189.50[ |
| T3 | 1395.67[ | 1170.62[ | 519.62±2.79 | 1264.05[ |
| T4 | 1301.25[ | 1095.64[ | 510.23±1.73 | 1187.84[ |
| T5 | 1366.23[ | 1159.87[ | 484.89±0.94 | 1254.89[ |
| T6 | 1613.48[ | 1367.78[ | 521.64±2.46 | 1478.33[ |
| T7 | 1573.85[ | 1335.40[ | 516.21±1.94 | 1443.91[ |
Mean values bearing different superscripts in a column differ significantly (p<0.05); T1: Basal diet, T2: 0.5% garlic powder, T3: 1% garlic powder, T4: 0.5% tulsi leaf powder, T5: 1% tulsi leaf powder, T6: Mixture of garlic powder and tulsi leaf powder at 0.5% each, T7: Mixture of garlic powder and tulsi leaf powder at 1% each
Relative quantitation expression analysis of the toll-like receptors (TLR 2, TLR 4 and TLR 7) with reference to the endogenous reference gene B actin.
| Sample name | Target Name | Cт | Cт Mean | Cт SD | ΔCт mean | RQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | TLR 2 | 16.567 | 16.544[ | 0.0297 | −2.801 | 1.000 |
| T2 | 16.455 | 16.387[ | 0.0591 | −2.457 | 0.787 | |
| T3 | 17.838 | 17.759[ | 0.0695 | −2.552 | 0.841 | |
| T4 | 16.409 | 16.476[ | 0.1109 | −2.728 | 0.950 | |
| T5 | 15.560 | 15.408[ | 0.1409 | −3.330 | 1.443 | |
| T6 | 17.029 | 16.958[ | 0.0723 | −2.396 | 0.755 | |
| T7 | 17.125 | 17.097[ | 0.0248 | −2.320 | 0.716 | |
| T1 | TLR 4 | 18.563 | 18.5541[ | 0.0201 | −0.791 | 1.000 |
| T2 | 17.995 | 18.009[ | 0.0261 | −0.834 | 1.030 | |
| T3 | 20.110 | 20.104[ | 0.1091 | −0.206 | 0.666 | |
| T4 | 18.336 | 18.329[ | 0.0199 | −0.875 | 1.060 | |
| T5 | 16.827 | 16.846[ | 0.0811 | −1.893 | 2.146 | |
| T6 | 18.587 | 18.630[ | 0.0420 | −0.724 | 0.954 | |
| T7 | 18.201 | 18.217[ | 0.0631 | −1.200 | 1.327 | |
| T1 | TLR 7 | 28.603 | 28.811[ | 0.1825 | 9.4658 | 1.000 |
| T2 | 28.506 | 28.727[ | 0.2148 | 9.8828 | 0.749 | |
| T3 | 27.854 | 28.158[ | 0.2643 | 7.8472 | 3.070 | |
| T4 | 28.352 | 28.454[ | 0.0901 | 9.2500 | 1.161 | |
| T5 | 28.557 | 28.920[ | 0.3323 | 10.180 | 0.609 | |
| T6 | 28.373 | 28.274[ | 0.0860 | 8.9186 | 1.461 | |
| T7 | 28.093 | 28.409[ | 0.4489 | 8.9919 | 1.388 |
Mean values bearing different superscripts in a column differ significantly (p<0.05). TLR=Toll-like receptors
Figure-1Amplification plot and melt curve for chicken toll-like receptors (TLR 2), TLR 4 and TLR 7. Panel A and B Amplification plot and melt curve for chicken TLRs 2. Panel C and D Amplification plot and melt curve for chicken TLRs 4. Panel E and F Amplification plot and melt curve for chicken TLRs 7.
Figure-2Effect of supplementation of garlic and holy basil leaf powder on relative mRNA expression of toll-like receptors 2 (TLR 2), TLR 4 and TLR 7 in the plasma of broilers. Significantly highest level of increase in the mRNA expression of TLR 2 and TLR 4 was observed in the treatment group T5. While, significantly highest increase in the mRNA expression of TLR 7 was observed in the treatment group T3 where broilers were fed garlic powder (GP) at 1% of the diet followed by the birds in the treatments groups T6 and T7 fed with increasing levels of 0.5% and 1% of the GP and holy basil leaf powder in combination, respectively.