| Literature DB >> 28246389 |
Qinyue Guo1, Huixia Li2, Lin Xu3, Shufang Wu4, Hongzhi Sun2, Bo Zhou5.
Abstract
Osteocalcin has been considered to be an important regulator of energy metabolism in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, the mechanism underlying the involvement of uncarboxylated osteocalcin in the vascular complications of T2DM is not fully understood. In the present study, we analyzed the potential correlations between uncarboxylated osteocalcin and macro- or microangiopathic complications in subjects with T2DM and tested the impact of uncarboxylated osteocalcin on insulin resistance in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). The results showed that the serum levels of uncarboxylated osteocalcin were lower in subjects with vascular complications of T2DM. Univariate correlation analyses revealed negative correlations between uncarboxylated osteocalcin and waist-to-hip ratio, HbA1c, and HOMA-IR. In in vitro experiments, insulin resistance was induced by applying tunicamycin to HUVECs. Uncarboxylated osteocalcin not only markedly reduced the phosphorylations of PERK and eIF2α, but also elevated the phosphorylations of IRS-1 and Akt, resulting in improvement of insulin signal transduction via PI3K/Akt/NF-κB signaling in HUVECs. Therefore, there is a possible relationship between uncarboxylated osteocalcin and the vascular complications of T2DM. Uncarboxylated osteocalcin partially improves insulin signal transduction via PI3K/Akt/NF-κB signaling in tunicamycin-induced HUVECs, suggesting osteocalcin as a potential treatment for the vascular complications of T2DM.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28246389 PMCID: PMC5427815 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00163-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Anthropometric and metabolic characteristics of the study groups.
| NGT | PDM | T2DM Without vascular complications | T2DM With vascular complications | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 22 | 18 | 25 | 33 |
| Age (years) | 48.2 ± 7.3 | 49.6 ± 9.2 | 50.7 ± 8.3 | 51.8 ± 6.6 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.5 ± 2.1 | 26.1 ± 1.7# | 26.5 ± 3.3* | 27.0 ± 2.6* |
| WHR | 0.82 ± 0.03 | 0.91 ± 0.06# | 0.88 ± 0.05 | 0.90 ± 0.07* |
| FPG (mmol/l) | 5.14 ± 0.24 | 5.38 ± 0.51 | 7.25 ± 0.81* | 7.83 ± 0.62* |
| FINS (mU/l) | 9.82 ± 1.32 | 12.04 ± 1.74 | 20.86 ± 2.75* | 25.96 ± 2.95* |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.21 ± 0.27 | 5.68 ± 0.39 | 6.08 ± 1.14* | 6.86 ± 0.98* |
| TC (mmol/l) | 4.60 ± 0.26 | 4.88 ± 0.75 | 5.09 ± 0.87* | 5.71 ± 0.93* |
| TG (mmol/l) | 1.21 ± 0.36 | 1.45 ± 0.45 | 2.13 ± 0.52* | 2.65 ± 0.90* |
| HDL-c (mmol/l) | 1.42 ± 0.82 | 1.35 ± 0.41 | 1.12 ± 0.12* | 1.01 ± 0.23* |
| LDL-c (mmol/l) | 3.12 ± 0.28 | 3.36 ± 0.34 | 3.58 ± 0.49 | 3.62 ± 0.52* |
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | 126.92 ± 10.61 | 121.24 ± 11.38 | 115.71 ± 8.16 | 58.75 ± 7.83* |
| Adiponectin (mg/l) | 12.28 ± 2.23 | 9.14 ± 0.72# | 7.09 ± 0.55* | 4.83 ± 0.37* |
| HOMA-IR | 2.15 ± 0.31 | 2.87 ± 0.55# | 7.51 ± 0.86* | 7.85 ± 2.29* |
BMI, body mass index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FINS, fasting plasma insulin; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin A1c; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment index of insulin resistance; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NGT, normal glucose tolerance; PDM, prediabetes; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio. Data are means ± SD or median (interquartile range).
*P < 0.05 for patients with type 2 diabetes versus normal glucose tolerant group.
# P < 0.05 obesity of prediabetes group versus normal glucose tolerant group.
Figure 1Serum ucOCN and totOCN concentrations in the subjects. Uncarboxylated and total osteocalcin levels were determined by ELISA. (A) Serum osteocalcin. (B) Serum uncarboxylated osteocalcin. (C) ucOCN/total OCN ratio. The data was expressed as mean ± SEM in each bar graph. *P < 0.05 (PDM, T2DM with or without vascular complications vs. NGT). #P < 0.05 (T2DM with vascular complications vs. T2DM without vascular complications).
Multiple logistic regression analysis showing factors independently associated with vascular complications of type 2 diabetes.
| Parameters | OR | 95%CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| ucOCN | 0.072 | 0.006–0.682 | 0.025 |
| Total OCN | 0.065 | 0.005–0.642 | 0.021 |
| BMI | 1.271 | 1.202–1.462 | 0.001 |
| FPG | 1.652 | 1.158–2.359 | 0.004 |
| HbA1c | 2.205 | 1.235–3.756 | 0.007 |
| HOMA-IR | 8.348 | 1.352–52.156 | 0.023 |
BMI, body mass index; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin A1c; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment index of insulin resistance; ucOCN, uncarboxylated osteocalcin.
Correlation of serum total and uncarboxylated osteocalcin levels with anthropometric parameters and biochemical indexes.
| ucOCN (adjust for age and BMI) | Total OCN (adjust for age and BMI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r |
| r |
| |
| WHR | −0.275 | <0.001 | −0.268 | <0.001 |
| FPG (mmol/l) | −0.312 | <0.001 | −0.295 | <0.001 |
| FINS (mU/l) | −0.225 | 0.004 | −0.182 | 0.017 |
| HbA1c (%) | −0.175 | 0.024 | −0.185 | 0.015 |
| TC (mmol/l) | −0.115 | 0.125 | −0.086 | 0.278 |
| TG (mmol/l) | −0.103 | 0.199 | −0.108 | 0.161 |
| HDL-c (mmol/l) | 0.084 | 0.280 | 0.138 | 0.070 |
| LDL-c (mmol/l) | −0.122 | 0.116 | 0.135 | 0.089 |
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | 0.172 | 0.022 | 0.164 | 0.035 |
| HOMA-IR | −0.194 | 0.012 | −0.202 | 0.009 |
BMI, body mass index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FINS, fasting plasma insulin; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin A1c; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment index of insulin resistance; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio.
Figure 2Effects of ucOCN on tunicamycin-induced ER stress and impaired insulin signaling in HUVECs. Tunicamycin (Tun) was used to induce insulin resistance. To determine the effects of uncarboxylated osteocalcin, HUVECs were treated with 5 ng/ml of uncarboxylated osteocalcin for 4 h. For insulin signaling, cells were stimulated with 10 nM of insulin for 10 min. The relative quantity of proteins was analyzed using Quantity One software. (A) Phosphorylation of PERK and eIF2α in HUVECs. (B) Densitometric analyses of PERK and eIF2α in HUVECs. (C) IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation and Akt Ser-473 phosphorylation in HUVECs. (D) Densitometric analyses of IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation and Akt Ser-473 phosphorylation in HUVECs. A representative blot from three independent experiments is shown and the data expressed as mean ± SEM in each bar graph represent the average of three independent experiments. *P < 0.05 (Tun vs. control). #P < 0.05 (Tun/ucOcn vs. Tun). IB, immunoblot; IP, immunoprecipitation.
Figure 3Effect of ucOCN on insulin signal transduction is mediated via PI3K/Akt/NF-κB signaling in HUVECs. Tunicamycin (Tun) was used to induce insulin resistance. For insulin signaling, cells were stimulated with 10 nM of insulin for 10 min. Cells were cultured in the presence or absence of uncarboxylated osteocalcin with or without specific signaling pathway inhibitors such as 10 μM wortmannin (a PI3K inhibitor), 10 μM Akti-1/2 (an AKT inhibitor) or 10 μM U0126 (a MAPK inhibitor) for 4 h. PI3K binding activity was determined by an in vitro kinase assay. NF-κB p65-DNA binding activity was determined by Elisa. The relative quantity of proteins was analyzed Quantity One software. (A) PI3K activity in HUVECs. (B) Phosphorylation of PERK and IRS-1 in HUVECs. (C) Densitometric analyses of PERK and IRS-1 in HUVECs. (D) NF-κB p65 DNA binding activity in HUVECs. A representative blot from three independent experiments is shown and the data expressed as mean ± SEM in each bar graph represent the average of three independent experiments. *P < 0.05 (Tun/ucOcn vs. Tun). # P < 0.05 (Tun/ucOcn/inhibitor vs. Tun/ucOcn). ΔP < 0.05 (Tun vs. control). IB, immunoblot; IP, immunoprecipitation.
Figure 4Effect of NF-κB blockade on ER stress and insulin signaling. Tunicamycin (Tun) was used to induce insulin resistance. HUVECs were cultured in the presence or absence of uncarboxylated osteocalcin with or without 1 μM PDTC (an NF-κB inhibitor) and 100 nM NF-κB-p65 siRNA. For insulin signaling, cells were stimulated with 10 nM of insulin for 10 min. The relative quantity of proteins was analyzed Quantity One software. (A) Protein expression of NF-κB-p65 in HUVECs. (B) Phosphorylation of PERK and IRS-1 in HUVECs. (C) Densitometric analyses of PERK and IRS-1 in HUVECs. A representative blot from three independent experiments is shown and the data expressed as mean ± SEM in each bar graph represent the average of three independent experiments. *P < 0.05 (Tun/ucOcn vs. Tun/Veh). # P < 0.05 (Tun/ucOcn/inhibitor vs. Tun/ucOcn). ΔP < 0.05 (p65 siRNA vs. control siRNA). IB, immunoblot; IP, immunoprecipitation.