| Literature DB >> 28246386 |
Gang Zhao1,2, Hui Zhang1,2, Xi Chen1,2, Xifang Zhu1,2, Yusi Guo1,2, Chenfei He1,2, Farhan Anwar Khan1,2, Yingyu Chen1,2, Changmin Hu1, Huanchun Chen1,2,3,4, Aizhen Guo5,6,7,8.
Abstract
Mycoplasma bovis causes considerable economic losses in the cattle industry worldwide. In mycoplasmal infections, adhesion to the host cell is of the utmost importance. In this study, the amino acid sequence of NOX was predicted to have enzymatic domains. The nox gene was then cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli. The enzymatic activity of recombinant NOX (rNOX) was confirmed based on its capacity to oxidize NADH to NAD+ and reduce O2 to H2O2. The adherence of rNOX to embryonic bovine lung (EBL) cells was confirmed with confocal laser scanning microscopy, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and flow cytometry. Both preblocking EBL cells with purified rNOX and preneutralizing M. bovis with polyclonal antiserum to rNOX significantly reduced the adherence of M. bovis to EBL cells. Mycoplasma bovis NOX-expressed a truncated NOX protein at a level 10-fold less than that of the wild type. The capacities of M. bovis NOX- for cell adhesion and H2O2 production were also significantly reduced. The rNOX was further used to pan phage displaying lung cDNA library and fibronectin was determined to be potential ligand. In conclusion, M. bovis NOX functions as both an active NADH oxidase and adhesin, and is therefore a potential virulence factor.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28246386 PMCID: PMC5427908 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00121-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Comparative distribution of the motifs for enzymatic activity and B epitopes in the sequences of NADH oxidase (NOX) of M. bovis and S. pyogenes. The domains or sites for enzyme activity are indicated in box in M. bovis and S. pyogenes NOX. The B-cell epitopes predicted by BepiPred are underlined. The numbers are labeled according to the amino acid sequence of M. bovis NOX.
Figure 2The cloning, expression, and enzymatic activity of NADH oxidase (NOX). (A) PCR amplification of M. bovis nox gene. Lane 1: negative control; Lane 2 and Lane 3: The mutated nox gene of M. bovis. M: DNA marker. (B) The localization of NOX and PGK in M. bovis. The total proteins, membrane proteins and cytosolic proteins were incubated with mAbs to rNOX (1:1000), mAbs to rVpmaX-like protein (1:1000), and antiserum against PGK (1:500). The membrane protein rVmapX-like served as positive control. The cropped blots are displayed here, the full-length blots are presented in supplementary information (Fig. S4). (C) Enzymatic activity of purified rNOX at 5 μg/ml. The OD340 nm values of rNOX group decreased with the time increasing, whereas no reduction in absorbance was observed in negative control (No rNOX) and blank control (No NADH). 5 μl mouse antiserum to rNOX (1:200) incubated with rNOX before testing enzyme activity, while the equal amount of mixed negative serum served as negative control serum. Compared the antiserum to rNOX with negative control serum and rNOX, we found anti-rNOX polyclonal antibody cannot affect rNOX enzyme activity. (D) Enzymatic activity of rNOX. After rNOX converted NADH to NAD+, a kit was used to confirm whether rNOX produced H2O2. Compared to No rNOX, it was determined that rNOX could produce H2O2. (E) H2O2 production by M. bovis NOX− and M. bovis WT grown in glycerol as the carbon source. Statistical significance was determined by student t test (p < 0.001(***)).
Figure 3Adhesion and its inhibition of rNOX to EBL cells. Adhesion of rNOX to EBL cells. 106 EBL cells interacted with 10 μg rNOX (A), 10 μg rPGK (D), or PBS (E). For adhesion inhibition of rNOX. 10 μg rNOX was pre-treated with 10 μl mouse antiserum to rNOX (B) or 10 μl mixed negative serum (C) in 1 ml MEM and then interacted with EBL cells. EBL cell actin filaments were labeled red with Rhodamine phalloidin and cell nuclei labeled blue with 4, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The rNOX was labeled green by mouse anti-rNOX mAb and goat anti-mouse IgG-FITC. (F) The adhesion and its inhibition of rNOX to EBL cells detected by flow cytometry. GraphPad Prism 5 software was used to evaluate the adhesion of rNOX to EBL. Compared with the rPGK by student t test, rNOX had a strong ability of adhesion to EBL cells (p < 0.001(***)).
Figure 4rNOX adhesion and adhesive inhibition assays with ELISA and flow cytometry. (A) Adhesion of rNOX to EBL cells detected by ELISA. 0.5 μg rNOX in 100 μl PBST containing 5% BSA was serially diluted to 128-folds and 100 μl of each dilution was added into the coated wells and incubated in the plates. (B) Adhesive inhibition of rNOX to EBL cells detected by ELISA. The adhesion of 0.25 μg rNOX was inhibited by serial dilutions (from 1:10 to 1:1280) of antiserum to rNOX, and the equal amount of rNOX treatment without antiserum served as control. The wells coated with BSA (0.5 μg/well) as the negative control or non-coated well as blank control. (C) The adhesion of M. bovis to EBL cells inhibited by rNOX. The 106 EBL cells were incubated with different concentration of rNOX before infection. BSA (5 μg) in 1 ml of MEM, 5 μg of M. bovis membrane proteins in 1 ml of MEM, and 1 ml of MEM alone were used as the negative, positive, and blank controls, respectively. (D) The adhesion of M. bovis to EBL cells inhibited by anti-rNOX serum. M. bovis were incubated with anti-rNOX serum diluted from 1:50 to 1:400 before infection. The mixed negative serum (three unimmunized mice serum) was severed as negative control and 1 ml of MEM without serum (No serum) was used as the blank control. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 represent statistically significant difference, and very significant difference, while “ns” represents no difference.
Figure 5Adhesion of M. bovis NOX− to EBL cells. (A) The result of sequencing Tn4001. The terminal sequence of Tn4001 was used for the amplification of sequence next to it. Then the sequence was used to map transposon insertion site and confirmed the NOX gene was inserted at 1276 nt (C-terminal of NOX gene). (B) The expression of NOX in M. bovis NOX−. The total proteins of M. bovis NOX− and M. bovis WT were incubated with antiserum against rPGK (1:500) or mAb (1:1000) to rNOX to detect the expression of NOX gene. The cropped blots are displayed here, the full-length blots are presented in supplementary information (Fig. S5). (C) Image J software was used to calculate the NOX/PGK ratio and then the expression of disrupted nox gene in M. bovis NOX− was compared with that intact nox in M. bovis WT. (D) The adhesion rates of M. bovis NOX− at three time points with MOI of 1:1000. ***p < 0.001 represents very significant difference.
Figure 6The fibronectin-binding ability of rNOX. The rNOX, rPGK, and E. coli total protein were applied to examine the fibronectin activity with indirect ELISA. Different amounts of proteins were coated in the 96 wells of ELISA plate. After washing and blocked with 5% BSA, 200 ng fibronectin in 100 μl PBST was added into each well and incubated for 1 h. And then the anti-fibronectin mAb and goat anti-mouse antibodies were sequentially overlaid to detect the binding activity. ***Represents very significant difference (p < 0.001), while “ns” represents no difference.
Oligonucleotide primers used for amplification and site-directed mutagenesis of NOX gene.
| Primers | Sequence (5′ → 3′) | Sites in Nox gene (nt) | Notes for the underlined |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pnox 1 | CCG | 1–26 |
|
| Pnox 2 | ATTCACCACCTAC | 133–154 | UGA to UGG |
| Pnox 3 | AGCAGTTTG | 132–154 | |
| Pnox 4 | GTTCGATTGG | 335–355 | |
| Pnox 5 | GGCGGTACATG | 334–354 | |
| Pnox 6 | TTTTACCTTTTTG | 497–523 | |
| Pnox 7 | CTGAAGCATTCTG | 497–523 | |
| Pnox 8 | GCGTTTCC | 1180–1199 | |
| Pnox 9 | ATTGGTTCATG | 1180–1205 | |
| Pnox 10 | GAC | 1338–1365 |
|
Oligonucleotide primers used for amplification and site-directed mutagenesis of PGK gene.
| Primers | Sequence (5′ → 3′) | Sites in Nox gene (nt) | Notes for the underlined |
|---|---|---|---|
| P669-1 | CA | 1–21 |
|
| P669-2 | CAAATATATCACCCAATGATGC | 409–436 | UGA to UGG |
| P669-3 | ATTGGGTGATATATTTGTTAATGATGCTTTTGGAA | 420–454 | |
| P669-4 | TTGGTCCATT | 935–955 | |
| P669-5 | AAACAGTTGTGTG | 932–957 | |
| P669-6 | AC | 1164–1185 |
|